Sigma 120-300 2.8 os vs Canon 100-400 is - Page 3

Wookster · 29th of May 2012 (Tue)

Quote:

Originally Posted by gocolts

I've been wondering this too...a 500 f/5.6L, built similar to the 400mm f/5.6L would be a dream come true.

If Sigma did a reasonably priced 500 F4/ F4.5 OS lens with the image quality of the current version I'd buy it.

Why Sigma hasn't updated their 500 & 800 is a mystery.

woos · 29th of May 2012 (Tue)

I've heard rumors that they may be updating the 300 and 500 primes to include OS. Dunno. :P

And just to throw it out there, the 50-500 OS is no slouch:

jhayesvw · 29th of May 2012 (Tue)

great photo.
I have found that all the zooms have good copies and not so good copies.
I guess the trick is to get a good one.

woos · 29th of May 2012 (Tue)

For sure, doubly so with Sigma stuff perhaps!

29th of May 2012 (Tue)	#32
woos Goldmember Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: a giant bucket Posts: 2,104 IMAGE EDITING OK	Re: Sigma 120-300 2.8 os vs Canon 100-400 is I've heard rumors that they may be updating the 300 and 500 primes to include OS. Dunno. :P And just to throw it out there, the 50-500 OS is no slouch: __________________ amanathia.zenfolio.com

29th of May 2012 (Tue)	#33
jhayesvw Cream of the Crop Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Tucson AZ Posts: 5,945 IMAGE EDITING OK	Re: Sigma 120-300 2.8 os vs Canon 100-400 is great photo. I have found that all the zooms have good copies and not so good copies. I guess the trick is to get a good one. __________________ Jeremy 7d, 50mm 1.8, 18-55 IS, 100-400L,430 exII My Flickr

29th of May 2012 (Tue)	#34
woos Goldmember Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: a giant bucket Posts: 2,104 IMAGE EDITING OK	Re: Sigma 120-300 2.8 os vs Canon 100-400 is For sure, doubly so with Sigma stuff perhaps! __________________ amanathia.zenfolio.com

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode