![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
My lens line-up is lacking in the ultra wide department, so I was planning on my next purchase to be a 17-35L. A lot of the shows I've been shooting lately though have had *very* bad lighting. Lighting where shooting @ f/2.8 with 12800 iso still isn't good enough.
The fastest lens in my bag is the 50L but I don't really like that focal length for shows. That's why I'm thinking maybe a 24L or even 35L might be a better choice than the 17-35L. I still have a 15mm fisheye, but I don't like using it all of the time. Anybody here use a 24mm L? If so, what do you think of it? Could you live without it or is it essential to your bag?
__________________
5D Mk III • 600EX-RT x 2
24-70L •70-200L IS II • 100L • 35L EF 15mm Fisheye Last edited by Norkusa : 28th of May 2012 (Mon) at 14:43. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,908
|
I am considering get the lens since I need the f/1.2 for those shows with "bad" lighting
__________________
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon 5DMKII Lenses: Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8 USM, Canon 16-35mm 2.8L USM II Canon 24-70mm 2.8L USM, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM II Compact: Canon G12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
The times I do use my 50L for shows, I never shoot it @ f/1.2. It's almost impossible for me to get anything in focus at that aperture. That's why I'm thinking I should probably just sell it and get the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 and put the leftover cash towards a 24L or 17-35L.
__________________
5D Mk III • 600EX-RT x 2
24-70L •70-200L IS II • 100L • 35L EF 15mm Fisheye |
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,908
|
Yeah, I do mean that, sorry
__________________
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon 5DMKII Lenses: Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8 USM, Canon 16-35mm 2.8L USM II Canon 24-70mm 2.8L USM, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM II Compact: Canon G12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,908
|
Don't you mean the 16-35mm? I can't see a listing for 17-35mm
__________________
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon 5DMKII Lenses: Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8 USM, Canon 16-35mm 2.8L USM II Canon 24-70mm 2.8L USM, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM II Compact: Canon G12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
After reading a few reviews, the 17-35L actually doesn't sound that bad. Looks like you can snag a used one easily for under $800, as opposed to double that for a new 16-35L.
__________________
5D Mk III • 600EX-RT x 2
24-70L •70-200L IS II • 100L • 35L EF 15mm Fisheye Last edited by Norkusa : 28th of May 2012 (Mon) at 17:24. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
|
I bought my 17-35 used for €350
The 16-35 isn't that much better, the 16-35Mk2 is. IMO, if you need to use a fast lens because the "light" is so low that ISO 128000 isn't enough, it's a good time to put the camera down Also: Keep in mind that DoF is surprisingly shallow even at 24mm when shooting f/1.4
__________________
"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams Why Color Management. Color Problems? Click here. MySpace Get Colormanaged PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Ended up shooting everything with my 50L @ f/1.4. You're right though, DOF stinks wide open like that but it was my only option.
__________________
5D Mk III • 600EX-RT x 2
24-70L •70-200L IS II • 100L • 35L EF 15mm Fisheye |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Andover, MA
Posts: 7,188
|
I've got a few shots at 12800 and higher. Maybe a separate thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 20
|
I have been using the 24 1.4 L for a few months now and I must say that it is an incredible lens...with some limitations. All I shoot are musicians in venues ranging from 1200 seat theaters to small 50 seat clubs. The 1.4 is wonderful in those low/no light clubs and house concert venues, there are tradeoffs but this is not studio photography. I am using a 1Ds-Mk-3 and usually shoot at 1600 but I can go to 3200 if needed. This lens pulls in a lot of light, which is why you spend the money on it, and it gives the FOV that I need in small venues. I have no regrets about this lens, it is what it is, a wide angle wide aperture lens that performs and it has made me want more primes!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 120
|
I own the Nikon version if the 24L, and I must say it is my favorite lens. The 24mm field of view is perfect, and the fast aperture just helps create a beautiful image. I really think it's the ultimate lens if you're on stage or in the pit. The only downside is that you have to be at the right place to get a good shot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 246
|
I don't shoot shows anymore, but when I did the 24 1.4 was the only lens I ever used. It was on a 7D, so it actually worked out to around 35mm. I'd imagine on full frame 24 might be a tad wide. Example, here I'm only 3 feet away from the singer:
![]() Pelle Ĺhman by Nοah Fence, on Flickr For full frame I think the Sigmalux 35 1.4 or 35L would be ideal. 50mm might work too, but sadly there is no 50mm lens available for Canon than can reliably focus LOL
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shooting pictures at concerts? | AOXOMOXOA | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 11 | 25th of February 2007 (Sun) 06:21 |
| Want to try shooting concerts | Claire | General Photography Talk | 11 | 3rd of February 2007 (Sat) 23:04 |
| 24-105 F4L good for shooting concerts? | Mike Philippens | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 12 | 30th of November 2006 (Thu) 19:03 |
| shooting concerts | corterlifecrisis | The Business of Photography | 22 | 28th of March 2006 (Tue) 19:25 |
| first time shooting concerts | Terry66 | Performing Arts | 17 | 7th of February 2006 (Tue) 10:45 |