LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


T4i high iso performance shots

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 08 Jun 2012 (Friday) 04:03   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Martzart
Senior Member
Martzart's Avatar
Joined May 2012
252 posts
Ontario, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

Had this linked in another thread, but it will get burried quickly.external link

Shoot at your highest iso setting and compare the noise to these shots.
The difference is an incredible leap up from the digic 4 crop bodies. 75% less noise.

Post #1, Jun 08, 2012 04:03:46


Deviant Art ~external link T4i/ T2i /Rip300d ~ 50mm f1.2L/135mm f2L/ 70-200mm f4L/ 100mm 2.8 macro/ Sigma 70-200 2.8/ Tamron 17-50 2.8/ 50 1.8 ~ 430 exII/ Vivitar 285hv/ Metz 60 ct-4

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
MrJulius
Mostly Lurking
Joined Jun 2010
11 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Can't belive it if it's true in real life :D

Post #2, Jun 08, 2012 04:20:38




LOG IN TO REPLY
jase1125
Goldmember
jase1125's Avatar
Joined May 2010
3,005 posts
Lewisville, TX (DFW)
[MORE/SHARE]

interesting

Post #3, Jun 08, 2012 08:06:54


Jason

LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Goldmember
Joined Dec 2011
4,472 posts
Houston, TX.
[MORE/SHARE]

The new DIGIC 5 is suppose to produce alot less noise.... however those are studio shots. I want to see some ISO 12800 and 25600 shots at F2.8 in real world use.

Post #4, Jun 08, 2012 08:12:07 as a reply to jase1125's post 5 minutes earlier.


Do not stand next to me.... I suffer from bad GAS.
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
Joined Mar 2011
5,394 posts
Dallas TX
[MORE/SHARE]

Talley wrote in post #14549466external link
The new DIGIC 5 is suppose to produce alot less noise.... however those are studio shots. I want to see some ISO 12800 and 25600 shots at F2.8 in real world use.

Yeah. But I'm sure the DIGIC 5 will improve ISO performance regardless. A huge amount? I don't know, but even a full stop plus some would be pretty cool and bode well for future crop sensors. I can only dream that it makes all of the next croppers jump in ISO performance like the 5d3 :D

Post #5, Jun 08, 2012 15:37:15


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Stone ­ 13
Goldmember
Stone 13's Avatar
Joined Aug 2009
1,688 posts
Huntersville, NC
[MORE/SHARE]

I assume these are jpegs and Canon has already proven they have a great jpg engine in the digic V. I wonder how the raw files will stack up, it appears Canon did the same kind of overhaul to the 18MP sensor that they did on the 5DIII sensor.

Post #6, Jun 08, 2012 15:43:07


Ken
5D III gripped | 35L | 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 85 1.8 | 430 EX II | Yongnuo YN-568EX | Billingham 445 | Think Tank UD 60 |

LOG IN TO REPLY
TheFarmer
Senior Member
TheFarmer's Avatar
Joined May 2012
267 posts
On a farm
[MORE/SHARE]

Looks fantastic!

Post #7, Jun 08, 2012 15:53:32


5DM3 | 35mm F2 | Sigma 50mm 1.4 | 24-105 F4L | Canon GP-E2 GPS | Canon ST-E3-RT | 2x 600EX-RT | The End

LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
jwcdds's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
12,168 posts
Santa Monica, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Looks like Canon's latest *.jpg voodoo magic. Same "magic" supposedly applied to the 5D3 and 1DX jpgs as well to claim a 2-stop improvement over previous generation.

Then ultimately, it's revealed that RAW is maybe... MAYBE 1/2 stop better.

Post #8, Jun 08, 2012 16:08:11


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMugexternal link | Blogexternal link
My Review | "The Mighty One"external link
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Goldmember
Joined Dec 2011
4,472 posts
Houston, TX.
[MORE/SHARE]

jwcdds wrote in post #14551861external link
Looks like Canon's latest *.jpg voodoo magic. Same "magic" supposedly applied to the 5D3 and 1DX jpgs as well to claim a 2-stop improvement over previous generation.

Then ultimately, it's revealed that RAW is maybe... MAYBE 1/2 stop better.

This. bw!

Post #9, Jun 08, 2012 17:00:17


Do not stand next to me.... I suffer from bad GAS.
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
Kaigler
Senior Member
Kaigler's Avatar
Joined Jul 2009
481 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Well that's particularly good for Rebel shooters. I would say a large portion of those shoot exclusively .jpg and don't even know what RAW file is.

Post #10, Jun 08, 2012 17:07:34 as a reply to Talley's post 7 minutes earlier.


Canon 5D Mk III - Canon 24-105 f/4 L IS, Sigma 85 f/1.4

LOG IN TO REPLY
davidc502
Goldmember
davidc502's Avatar
Joined Dec 2010
3,405 posts
Tennessee
[MORE/SHARE]

I've got the Digic 5 processor in my Canon S100, and the noise reduction is quite good, but at a cost of detail.

Post #11, Jun 08, 2012 17:14:49


_
My Gear is ---> Here

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ljason8eg
Senior Member
Joined Feb 2011
477 posts
Elk Grove, California
[MORE/SHARE]

Kaigler wrote in post #14552096external link
Well that's particularly good for Rebel shooters. I would say a large portion of those shoot exclusively .jpg and don't even know what RAW file is.

This. A good portion of these cameras sit in green box mode their whole lives with the advanced settings never being touched.

Post #12, Jun 08, 2012 17:27:50


Jason
Gear: 1D Mark III | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 | 24-105 f/4L IS | 70-200 f/2.8L | Tamron 150-600 f/5-6.3 | 580 EX II |

LOG IN TO REPLY
FuturamaJSP
Goldmember
FuturamaJSP's Avatar
Joined Oct 2009
1,880 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I am sure most people in here shoot RAW so those jpg comparisons are pointless

Post #13, Jun 08, 2012 20:51:40


They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
blah blah blah
DAexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
gotak
Senior Member
Joined May 2009
949 posts
Toronto, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

Noise is one thing detail is another. Not that those test shots were that bad for details but in general those preview test shots of late from dpreview have not been the best at figuring out what the real situation is for the noise vs details situation. So I wouldn't get that excited yet.

Post #14, Jun 08, 2012 21:30:17


http://bubble-trees.com/external link
7D x2,, 50 f1.8, 11-16 f2.8, 17-55 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS II, 100 2.8L, 430EX, 580EX, Di866, pixel king wireless TTL trigger.

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
3,313 views & 0 likes for this thread
T4i high iso performance shots
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00122 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
826 guests, 623 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is DrewB777

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.