Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > RAW, Post Processing and Printing
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8th of June 2012 (Fri)   #1
AxxisPhoto
Senior Member
 
AxxisPhoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,833
Default Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

Interesting read.

He makes some good points, but I'll still shoot in RAW.
__________________
Alex
2x 5Dmk2 | 70-200mm f2.8L IS | 24-105mm f4L IS | Alien Bees lights |
AxxisPhoto
AxxisPhoto is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 8th of June 2012 (Fri)   #2
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
 
tzalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
Posts: 12,349
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

The only point I see is 'don't let somebody else convert your Raws.'
__________________
Elie / אלי
"If you presume to love something, you must love the process of it much more than you love the finished product." John Irving, 5/2012. "In theory there is no difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is." Yogi Berra
Site
tzalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of June 2012 (Fri)   #3
René Damkot
Moderator
 
René Damkot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
Posts: 39,852
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

Nice read indeed. And good arguments to never deliver an unfinished product.

For my work, I prefer raw as well, for the reasons he states
__________________
"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams

Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.

MySpace
Get Colormanaged
Twitter

PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
René Damkot is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 8th of June 2012 (Fri)   #4
criTalon
Member
 
criTalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 40
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

Very interesting and great post from a different POV.
__________________
"I've found there's a fine line to chasing a dream and being a bum...but along the way, it's always an adventure - life is what you make it" - Lindsey Stirling
500px
criTalon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of June 2012 (Fri)   #5
TeleFragger
Goldmember
 
TeleFragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Williamstown, NJ
Posts: 2,791
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

wow.. nice read thanks..
im a hobbyist.. was doing .jpg and raw.. but deleted the raws without processing
i was at my neighbors and took some pics in the house.. the kitchen was dark and a lot of people over.. the cabinets looked way off.. i attempted an edit on the raw and it looked way better.
i converted over to raw only to force me to edit raw and learn...
but just recently i have figured im going back to raw +jpg and only edit what needs to be..

im a hobbyist and want the memories for my kids...
__________________
GearBag - Feedback****Flickr - my playhouse****RF-603 Discussion
Canon T2i-Gripped|64GB| YN-468 Flash | YN-468 II Flash | RF-603 | EF-S 18-55 IS|EF 24-105L|EF 50 MKII 1.8|EF-S 55-250 IS |EF 85 1.8 |Primo's Trigger Stick Monopod | Manfrotto Carbon Fiber Tripod
if I post a pic.. it is there to be picked on... (I have thick skin.. im in IT)
TeleFragger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of June 2012 (Fri)   #6
Preeb
Goldmember
 
Preeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Logan County, CO
Posts: 2,320
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

I can see his point since he has full control of the lighting and subject. He has the luxury of being able to shoot for hours without any surprises. And he can make the in-camera settings work in partnership with studio control to put out quality jpegs.

I never know what I might point my camera at next. He even admits that if he shot in conditions where the lighting changes constantly that he'd probably shoot RAW too (although he does seem to have plenty of RAW in his jpegs )
__________________
Rick

60D - EF-S 10-22 f3.5-f4.5 -- EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS -- EF-S 60mm f2.8 Macro -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC
Preeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of June 2012 (Fri)   #7
rpaul
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: BC NJ
Posts: 621
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

Seem's like he's dismissing RAW because it requires post processing? That shouldn't be a new or foreign concept, at this point... RAW when you want to process, JPG when you want SOOC.
__________________
Rob | rmpaul.com
Gear 'n Stuff
C&C always welcome
rpaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of June 2012 (Fri)   #8
Brain Mechanic
Goldmember
 
Brain Mechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,521
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

His basic complain is how some people manipulate RAW files, why he is against RAW again?? I mean RAW is superior form a postprocessing point of view but of course, it will depend on who does this postprocessing. RAW is not automatically better. If today's digital cameras give you the option of shooting both (RAW/JEPG) it makes perfect sense to shoot with both. For a quick pic without too much post work I go JPEG, for serious post I go RAW.
Brain Mechanic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of June 2012 (Fri)   #9
Kronie
Goldmember
 
Kronie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,174
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brain Mechanic View Post
For a quick pic without too much post work I go JPEG, for serious post I go RAW.
This is what I try to do but it sucks when I forget to go back to RAW and realize that I just took a number "serious" images, that were taken in JPEG....
__________________
5D Mk III's | 40D | Σ 50 1.4 | 100L | 16-35 MKII | 24-70 MKII | 70-200 MKII | Kenko 1.4TC | 600 & 580 EX'S | Gitzo Explorer
Kronie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of June 2012 (Fri)   #10
tonylong
do I really have to respond?
 
tonylong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 52,353
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

Like he said, the majority of his work is in the studio where he has control over all the aspects of lighting/exposure. Plenty of photogs have expressed a similar preference. And, he acknowledges that for other types of photography he'd shoot Raw. However, I wouldn't look to him as an expert/teacher on the subject!
__________________
Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase
Wildlife project pics here, Biking Photog shoots here, "Suburbia" project here! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here
tonylong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of June 2012 (Fri)   #11
Wilt
Cream of the Crop
 
Wilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: California
Posts: 33,050
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

Ken Marcus says,
"I was asked to shoot RAW files and send those to their editors. I wasn’t too pleased at the prospect, but did as my client asked.
"When the results were published, I was horrified. The printed images were flat, low-contrast, unsaturated, dull and very unexciting—not what I intended at all.
"So, for my next assignment, I decided to provide them with some finalized high-quality JPGs that were corrected, retouched and contrast controlled in addition to the RAW files they requested. These were images that I felt were up to my standards and reflected the quality that the magazine used to (and still should have) exhibit."

What he fails to appreciate is that the problem is merely
  • the magazine's art director told the guy who did the RAW conversion what they wanted, or
  • the idiot doing RAW conversion did not follow the necessary technique to extract output with better contrast and color saturation,

...not the way Ken would have preferred his images to come out.
The replies to that post exhibit far better insight than Ken does!

The other real point is that Ken was essentially forced to deliver the digital equivalent of 'raw exposed, unprocessed film' to his client. In the film days, it was like being the 'low cost hired shutter release' who drops rolls of exposed film the client's hands and walks away. So if the final prints look like a POS, it is solely because the photographer relinquished all quality control after pushing the shutter button, and left it to the mercy of the client.
No film shooting professional in his right might would do that; most likely the veteran pro would NOT even turn over processed negatives and leave it to the unknown of the print maker (it could be Walgreen's, fergawdsake) for the final product, the print. So the fact that he gave the client 'raw film (RAW files)' rather than 'digital prints (JPG)' is what he should have criticized himself for doing.
__________________
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention
Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php

Last edited by Wilt : 8th of June 2012 (Fri) at 16:43.
Wilt is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9th of June 2012 (Sat)   #12
Picture North Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,293
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilt View Post
Ken Marcus says,
"I was asked to shoot RAW files and send those to their editors. I wasn’t too pleased at the prospect, but did as my client asked.
"When the results were published, I was horrified. The printed images were flat, low-contrast, unsaturated, dull and very unexciting—not what I intended at all.
"So, for my next assignment, I decided to provide them with some finalized high-quality JPGs that were corrected, retouched and contrast controlled in addition to the RAW files they requested. These were images that I felt were up to my standards and reflected the quality that the magazine used to (and still should have) exhibit."

What he fails to appreciate is that the problem is merely
  • the magazine's art director told the guy who did the RAW conversion what they wanted, or
  • the idiot doing RAW conversion did not follow the necessary technique to extract output with better contrast and color saturation,
...not the way Ken would have preferred his images to come out.
The replies to that post exhibit far better insight than Ken does!

The other real point is that Ken was essentially forced to deliver the digital equivalent of 'raw exposed, unprocessed film' to his client. In the film days, it was like being the 'low cost hired shutter release' who drops rolls of exposed film the client's hands and walks away. So if the final prints look like a POS, it is solely because the photographer relinquished all quality control after pushing the shutter button, and left it to the mercy of the client.
No film shooting professional in his right might would do that; most likely the veteran pro would NOT even turn over processed negatives and leave it to the unknown of the print maker (it could be Walgreen's, fergawdsake) for the final product, the print. So the fact that he gave the client 'raw film (RAW files)' rather than 'digital prints (JPG)' is what he should have criticized himself for doing.
Aces!

Ken's entire premises is flawed. Instead of relinquishing quality control to others (who apparently don't understand quality), he should have taken the time to maintain and deliver quality himself. Ken is lazy. He took the lazy man's way out.
__________________
Fine Art Gallery| Website | Blog | Twitter | Pinterest | Facebook | NEW: Crated
-----------------------
Gear list - my equipment is bigger than your equipment
Picture North Carolina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th of June 2012 (Sat)   #13
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
 
tzalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
Posts: 12,349
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

I find it entirely incredible that a professional would give Raws to anybody - unless he had a clause in his contract that forbid their conversion and use. Or another clause forbidding the use of his name in the photo credit.
__________________
Elie / אלי
"If you presume to love something, you must love the process of it much more than you love the finished product." John Irving, 5/2012. "In theory there is no difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is." Yogi Berra
Site
tzalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th of June 2012 (Sat)   #14
kirkt
Goldmember
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Posts: 4,055
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

His article could have been one sentence long: "I prefer JPEG because the scenes I shoot do not require raw and, in my situation, raw adds unnecessary work."

He gets into trouble when he deviates from this line of reasoning. The fact that he does not use raw is evident in his opinions about it.

Kirk
__________________
Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.com
kirkt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th of June 2012 (Sun)   #15
Jimmer411
Thank god Im green.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Enumclaw, WA
Posts: 811
Default Re: Even Ken Marcus prefers JPEG over RAW!!

No matter how close I meter the scene I appreciate the extra flexibility that raw gives me. I guess this guy is supposed to be a pro, but he sounds like an idiot to me.
__________________
50D | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 430EX | YN-460-II | RF-602 x2 |
Jimmer411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it possible? Ken Rockwell prefers the 5D3 over the D800? h4ppydaze Canon EOS Digital Cameras 55 21st of April 2012 (Sat) 14:54
Djokovic prefers Nikon :) smorter Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 43 18th of January 2011 (Tue) 19:59
Who here actually prefers the 85 1.8 over the 1.2? BenjaminNg Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 58 9th of August 2009 (Sun) 04:17
no money for grip, he prefers to invest in glass Rodinal Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 37 13th of May 2009 (Wed) 18:21
looks like somebody prefers Nikon... blonde The POTN Lounge 2 11th of August 2007 (Sat) 08:00


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.