![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,908
|
Does anyone use this lens for concert photography? If so, is it a good alternative to the 35mm f/1.4L lens?
__________________
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon 5DMKII Lenses: Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8 USM, Canon 16-35mm 2.8L USM II Canon 24-70mm 2.8L USM, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM II Compact: Canon G12 |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane QLD Australia
Posts: 390
|
i wouldn't call it an alternative to the 35 1.4 but if you can't afford the 1.4 its an option. Vastly different in terms of iq and build quality. If you're using a crop the sigma 30 is a good mid point if you get a good one.
Also based on my limited experience in shooting concerts i generally wouldn't recommend a 35, that focal length on ff is very limiting in a concert environment
__________________
500px Leica M6 Titanium | X100S | Ricoh GR1 | Nikon FM2 | Yashica 12 | Fuji 690II | Pink Lomo Sprocket Rocket Leica 35mm Summicron-M ASPH | Leica 50mm Summilux-M Pre-ASPH E46 And a truck lock of film |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,908
|
I fine the 50mm very limiting. Yea, well with it being an L series, it is going to be very different compared to the f/2.0. My 24-70mm should be dead by now but luckily isn't
__________________
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon 5DMKII Lenses: Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8 USM, Canon 16-35mm 2.8L USM II Canon 24-70mm 2.8L USM, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM II Compact: Canon G12 |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane QLD Australia
Posts: 390
|
What do you hope to get from a 35 2.0 that you can't get from the 24-70? Obviously apart from the faster aperture.
__________________
500px Leica M6 Titanium | X100S | Ricoh GR1 | Nikon FM2 | Yashica 12 | Fuji 690II | Pink Lomo Sprocket Rocket Leica 35mm Summicron-M ASPH | Leica 50mm Summilux-M Pre-ASPH E46 And a truck lock of film |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,908
|
More light and wider angle than the 50mm that I have
__________________
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon 5DMKII Lenses: Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8 USM, Canon 16-35mm 2.8L USM II Canon 24-70mm 2.8L USM, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM II Compact: Canon G12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,908
|
Oh poo, there is a 28mm f/1.8 which is £100 dearer
__________________
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon 5DMKII Lenses: Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8 USM, Canon 16-35mm 2.8L USM II Canon 24-70mm 2.8L USM, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM II Compact: Canon G12 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 73
|
I have the 35 1.4 and I LOVE the focal length. I think it's my favorite actually.
__________________
Wedding Photographer in Charlotte |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,908
|
Quote:
Its a little bit too pricey for my liking, though I do see your point. I was looking at the Sigma 30mm 1.4 until someone told me about the vignetting problem, particularly at 1.4 on my full frame camera
__________________
Bodies: Canon 50D, Canon 5DMKII Lenses: Canon 50mm 1.8, Canon 85mm 1.8 USM, Canon 16-35mm 2.8L USM II Canon 24-70mm 2.8L USM, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM II Compact: Canon G12 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 lens better than the Canon 16-35mm f/2.8 MK II? | lsquare | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 2 | 19th of April 2010 (Mon) 02:30 |
| Which lens should i keep? 35mm 1.4L or 16-35mm 2.8L II? | axcel23 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 19 | 23rd of May 2009 (Sat) 04:58 |
| Looking for Wide Angle Lens for Full Frame 17-40mm 17-35mm 16-35mm | restin9 | Classifieds: Buy | 1 | 3rd of March 2009 (Tue) 04:03 |
| If you have 70-200mm lens, which lens will you get? 16-35mm or 24-70mm? | chobits | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 21 | 7th of June 2008 (Sat) 19:50 |