Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > The Business of Photography
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18th of June 2012 (Mon)   #1
chrismar
Member
 
chrismar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 67
Default Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?

Discuss.
__________________
Website | Blog | Facebook | Flickr | Prints
chrismar is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 18th of June 2012 (Mon)   #2
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
 
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
Posts: 57,559
Default Re: Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?

Yes...

In fact, well-known photo attorney Carolyn Wright uses "Editorial" and "Fine Art" interchangeably to mean "Non-Commercial."
__________________
"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.
FlyingPhotog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of June 2012 (Mon)   #3
chrismar
Member
 
chrismar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 67
Default Re: Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingPhotog View Post
Yes...

In fact, well-known photo attorney Carolyn Wright uses "Editorial" and "Fine Art" interchangeably to mean "Non-Commercial."
Link?
__________________
Website | Blog | Facebook | Flickr | Prints
chrismar is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 18th of June 2012 (Mon)   #4
stephenb49
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 15
Default Re: Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?

There is nothing to discuss. It is a self evident non-question. "Editorial" and "commercial" usages have been defined for over seventy years, and despite the reigning confusion and daily nonsense churned up by the general run of uninformed forum users, their definitions are not in doubt, and will not be redefined any time soon.

And in case you are genuinely wondering: editorial usage is non commercial...editorial and commercial usage are mutually exclusive, despite the ability for them to coexist within what might be regarded as an editorial publication, or as some would have it, a commercial publication, such as a magazine or newspaper
stephenb49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of June 2012 (Mon)   #5
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
 
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
Posts: 57,559
Default Re: Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrismar View Post
Link?
http://www.photoattorney.com/

Her blog is a regular stop on my web tours and her book is always next to my keyboard.
__________________
"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.
FlyingPhotog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of June 2012 (Mon)   #6
chrismar
Member
 
chrismar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 67
Default Re: Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stephenb49 View Post
There is nothing to discuss. It is a self evident non-question. "Editorial" and "commercial" usages have been defined for over seventy years, and despite the reigning confusion and daily nonsense churned up by the general run of uninformed forum users, their definitions are not in doubt, and will not be redefined any time soon.

And in case you are genuinely wondering: editorial usage is non commercial...editorial and commercial usage are mutually exclusive, despite the ability for them to coexist within what might be regarded as an editorial publication, or as some would have it, a commercial publication, such as a magazine or newspaper
Thanks, the best explanation I've read.

In this context, what is the definition of "editorial"?
__________________
Website | Blog | Facebook | Flickr | Prints
chrismar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th of June 2012 (Mon)   #7
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
 
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
Posts: 57,559
Default Re: Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?

In short, "Editorial" is News or Newsworthy
__________________
"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.
FlyingPhotog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th of June 2012 (Tue)   #8
Dan Marchant
Goldmember
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,873
Default Re: Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?

It is important to understand that in relation to photography "commercial use" is not the same as "making money".

A photographer can license a print of a photo for private use, or license a photo for editorial use in a newspaper. Although she makes money this isn't what is normally meant by "commercial use". Commercial use means that the person or company that licenses the image uses it for advertising/marketing/promotion of a company/product or service. This form of commercial use is what requires a model release/permission from the person in the picture because their likeness is being used to promote/sell a product.
__________________
Dan Marchant
Website/blog - www.danmarchant.com
Facebook - www.facebook.com/DanMarchantPhotography
Gear Canon 5DIII + lenses + plastic widget I found in the camera box.
Dan Marchant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th of June 2012 (Tue)   #9
elrey2375
Goldmember
 
elrey2375's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,376
Default Re: Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Marchant View Post
It is important to understand that in relation to photography "commercial use" is not the same as "making money".

A photographer can license a print of a photo for private use, or license a photo for editorial use in a newspaper. Although she makes money this isn't what is normally meant by "commercial use". Commercial use means that the person or company that licenses the image uses it for advertising/marketing/promotion of a company/product or service. This form of commercial use is what requires a model release/permission from the person in the picture because their likeness is being used to promote/sell a product.
Exactly
elrey2375 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st of June 2012 (Thu)   #10
RDKirk
Cream of the Crop
 
RDKirk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 11,579
Default Re: Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?

Quote:
Commercial use means that the person or company that licenses the image uses it for advertising/marketing/promotion of a company/product or service. This form of commercial use is what requires a model release/permission from the person in the picture because their likeness is being used to promote/sell a product.
I would add that in the US, "commercial use" is defined at the state level, as privacy laws and case law that requires model releases are also at the state level.

In states where "commercial use" is specifically defined by legislation, Dan's definition is true. In states where it has been defined by case law, Dan's definition is also true.

Notice that it's "commercial use" which is defined as requiring a model release. In at least a couple of states (NY and IL, that I know about), the commercial uses of a photographer's portfolio and display in the studio are explicitly exempted by law from requiring a model release. Thus, the definitions of "editorial" and "art" are irrelevant--the laws do not address them.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment guarantee of free expression also includes the right of the artist to earn his living through his free expression, thus selling the work itself cannot be inhibited, nor can advertising the sale of the work itself be inhibited.

That's why you can sell a photograph as well as put that photograph into an advertisement for the sale of that photograph...all without a model release. Note, though, that neither possession of a model release nor the First Amendment is an airtight protection from a lawsuit for personal damages that your use may cause.

Last edited by RDKirk : 21st of June 2012 (Thu) at 13:19.
RDKirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What should a camera strap say? "Sexy Beast", "Canon", "Pro", "Wedding Photographer" nemo man General Photography Talk 206 6th of June 2012 (Wed) 11:46
5D Mark II question-"Camera Set" and "Shoot.func" with "INFO" button divinemind Canon EOS Digital Cameras 0 20th of November 2010 (Sat) 19:33
"Echo", "Cleopatra", "Kahn", & "Yeager". PhotosGuy Wildlife 24 24th of March 2010 (Wed) 21:16
Petition to divide the "People" forum to "Babies/Kids" and "Adults" Wildewinds Forum Talk 22 27th of September 2006 (Wed) 18:09


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.