Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography
Thread started 18 Jun 2012 (Monday) 21:55
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?

 
chrismar
Member
chrismar's Avatar
69 posts
Joined Nov 2009
NJ
Jun 18, 2012 21:55 |  #1

Discuss.


Websiteexternal link | Blogexternal link | Facebookexternal link | Flickrexternal link | Printsexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
57,560 posts
Joined May 2007
Probably Chasing Aircraft
Jun 18, 2012 21:58 |  #2

Yes...

In fact, well-known photo attorney Carolyn Wright uses "Editorial" and "Fine Art" interchangeably to mean "Non-Commercial."


Jay
Crosswind Imagesexternal link
Facebook Fan Pageexternal link

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

LOG IN TO REPLY
chrismar
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
chrismar's Avatar
69 posts
Joined Nov 2009
NJ
Jun 18, 2012 22:02 |  #3

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #14598717external link
Yes...

In fact, well-known photo attorney Carolyn Wright uses "Editorial" and "Fine Art" interchangeably to mean "Non-Commercial."

Link?


Websiteexternal link | Blogexternal link | Facebookexternal link | Flickrexternal link | Printsexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
stephenb49
Mostly Lurking
15 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Jun 18, 2012 22:08 |  #4

There is nothing to discuss. It is a self evident non-question. "Editorial" and "commercial" usages have been defined for over seventy years, and despite the reigning confusion and daily nonsense churned up by the general run of uninformed forum users, their definitions are not in doubt, and will not be redefined any time soon.

And in case you are genuinely wondering: editorial usage is non commercial...editorial and commercial usage are mutually exclusive, despite the ability for them to coexist within what might be regarded as an editorial publication, or as some would have it, a commercial publication, such as a magazine or newspaper




LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
57,560 posts
Joined May 2007
Probably Chasing Aircraft
Jun 18, 2012 22:09 |  #5

chrismar wrote in post #14598739external link
Link?

http://www.photoattorn​ey.com/external link

Her blog is a regular stop on my web tours and her book is always next to my keyboard.


Jay
Crosswind Imagesexternal link
Facebook Fan Pageexternal link

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

LOG IN TO REPLY
chrismar
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
chrismar's Avatar
69 posts
Joined Nov 2009
NJ
Jun 18, 2012 22:14 |  #6

stephenb49 wrote in post #14598766external link
There is nothing to discuss. It is a self evident non-question. "Editorial" and "commercial" usages have been defined for over seventy years, and despite the reigning confusion and daily nonsense churned up by the general run of uninformed forum users, their definitions are not in doubt, and will not be redefined any time soon.

And in case you are genuinely wondering: editorial usage is non commercial...editorial and commercial usage are mutually exclusive, despite the ability for them to coexist within what might be regarded as an editorial publication, or as some would have it, a commercial publication, such as a magazine or newspaper

Thanks, the best explanation I've read.

In this context, what is the definition of "editorial"?


Websiteexternal link | Blogexternal link | Facebookexternal link | Flickrexternal link | Printsexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
FlyingPhotog's Avatar
57,560 posts
Joined May 2007
Probably Chasing Aircraft
Jun 18, 2012 22:27 |  #7

In short, "Editorial" is News or Newsworthy


Jay
Crosswind Imagesexternal link
Facebook Fan Pageexternal link

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Goldmember
Dan Marchant's Avatar
3,926 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
Jun 19, 2012 03:54 as a reply to FlyingPhotog's post |  #8

It is important to understand that in relation to photography "commercial use" is not the same as "making money".

A photographer can license a print of a photo for private use, or license a photo for editorial use in a newspaper. Although she makes money this isn't what is normally meant by "commercial use". Commercial use means that the person or company that licenses the image uses it for advertising/marketing/​promotion of a company/product or service. This form of commercial use is what requires a model release/permission from the person in the picture because their likeness is being used to promote/sell a product.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: http://www.danmarchant​.comexternal link
Facebook: http://www.facebook.co​m/danmarchantphotograp​hyexternal link
Instagram: http://www.instagram.c​om/underworshippedexternal link
Gear Canon 5DIII + lenses + plastic widget I found in the camera box.

LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
elrey2375's Avatar
4,905 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Nov 2011
Jun 19, 2012 13:05 |  #9

Dan Marchant wrote in post #14599636external link
It is important to understand that in relation to photography "commercial use" is not the same as "making money".

A photographer can license a print of a photo for private use, or license a photo for editorial use in a newspaper. Although she makes money this isn't what is normally meant by "commercial use". Commercial use means that the person or company that licenses the image uses it for advertising/marketing/​promotion of a company/product or service. This form of commercial use is what requires a model release/permission from the person in the picture because their likeness is being used to promote/sell a product.

Exactly


http://emjfotografi.co​m/external link
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografiexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Cream of the Crop
RDKirk's Avatar
11,884 posts
Joined May 2004
USA
Jun 21, 2012 13:12 as a reply to elrey2375's post |  #10

Commercial use means that the person or company that licenses the image uses it for advertising/marketing/​promotion of a company/product or service. This form of commercial use is what requires a model release/permission from the person in the picture because their likeness is being used to promote/sell a product.

I would add that in the US, "commercial use" is defined at the state level, as privacy laws and case law that requires model releases are also at the state level.

In states where "commercial use" is specifically defined by legislation, Dan's definition is true. In states where it has been defined by case law, Dan's definition is also true.

Notice that it's "commercial use" which is defined as requiring a model release. In at least a couple of states (NY and IL, that I know about), the commercial uses of a photographer's portfolio and display in the studio are explicitly exempted by law from requiring a model release. Thus, the definitions of "editorial" and "art" are irrelevant--the laws do not address them.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment guarantee of free expression also includes the right of the artist to earn his living through his free expression, thus selling the work itself cannot be inhibited, nor can advertising the sale of the work itself be inhibited.

That's why you can sell a photograph as well as put that photograph into an advertisement for the sale of that photograph...all without a model release. Note, though, that neither possession of a model release nor the First Amendment is an airtight protection from a lawsuit for personal damages that your use may cause.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,125 views & 0 likes for this thread
Is "editorial" use considered "non-commercial" use?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00086 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is jilldwr
813 guests, 601 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016