LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


ISO user advice for Tamron 70-200 2.8

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Performing Arts Talk
Thread started 30 Jun 2012 (Saturday) 18:10   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
mr2step
Senior Member
mr2step's Avatar
Joined Sep 2008
416 posts
Ocala, Florida
[MORE/SHARE]

I am in the market for a new longer focal length lens to shoot the occasional concert. I've rented the canon 70-200 2.8 L and the 70-200 2.8 IS L and really liked them both though a tad heavy. I've been doing some research and am on a budget so I cannot afford the Canon L as much as I would like. So, I was reading about the Tamron 70-200 2.8 DI and came across a review that said the auto focus was poor in low light situations such as concerts. Does anyone have this lens and if so, have they shot concerts with it and had any issues with the autofocus? I typically shoot on Auto Serve if subject is moving a lot or on one shot. I really want to get a new lens as the price is in my budget but don't wanna buy something that I'm gonna regret buying because it doesn't do the one thing I need it to do.So I'm looking for actual user advice and reviews. It would be oh so helpful! Thanks!

Post #1, Jun 30, 2012 18:10:25


Do what you love, and you will never work a day in your life.
www.Brettmissick.comexternal link

http://www.facebook.co​m/brettmissickphotogra​phyexternal linkhttp://www.facebook.co​m/brettmissickphotogra​phyexternal linkhttp://www.brettmissic​k.wordpress.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
CosmoKid
Goldmember
CosmoKid's Avatar
Joined May 2009
4,233 posts
NJ
[MORE/SHARE]

have you thought about the Sigma 70-200?

Post #2, Jul 03, 2012 08:35:03


Joe- 2 bodies, L 2.8 zoom trilogy and a couple of primes
iRocktheShot.comexternal link - Portfolioexternal link

Gear/Feedback
Facebook "Fan" Pageexternal link -

LOG IN TO REPLY
mr2step
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
mr2step's Avatar
Joined Sep 2008
416 posts
Ocala, Florida
[MORE/SHARE]

I hadn't considered Sigma actually. My main reason for Tamron was the 6 yr warranty which I don't believe Sigma can match. Also, I had "heard" that Sigma was a cheap built lens. Is this wrong? How is autofocus in dark situations like concerts?

Post #3, Jul 05, 2012 09:45:37 as a reply to CosmoKid's post 2 days earlier.


Do what you love, and you will never work a day in your life.
www.Brettmissick.comexternal link

http://www.facebook.co​m/brettmissickphotogra​phyexternal linkhttp://www.facebook.co​m/brettmissickphotogra​phyexternal linkhttp://www.brettmissic​k.wordpress.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
DC ­ Fan
Cream of the Crop
DC Fan's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
5,728 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

mr2step wrote in post #14673428external link
I hadn't considered Sigma actually. My main reason for Tamron was the 6 yr warranty which I don't believe Sigma can match. Also, I had "heard" that Sigma was a cheap built lens. Is this wrong? How is autofocus in dark situations like concerts?

From a Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX II non stabilized lens,external link at an indifferently-illuminated stage.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Camera Maker: Canon
Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D
Lens: 70-200mm
Image Date: 2012-02-11 13:42:26 (no TZ)
Focal Length: 165.0mm
Aperture: f/3.5
Exposure Time: 0.0040 s (1/250)
ISO equiv: 6400
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Camera Maker: Canon
Camera Model: Canon EOS 60D
Lens: 70-200mm
Image Date: 2012-02-11 16:03:48 (no TZ)
Focal Length: 200.0mm
Aperture: f/4.0
Exposure Time: 0.0031 s (1/320)
ISO equiv: 6400
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: Manual
Exposure Mode: Manual
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
For comparison, a stage image from a Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 lens.external link

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Aperture: f/2.8
Exposure Time: 0.0040 s (1/250)
ISO equiv: 1600
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Matrix
Exposure: program (Auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: No (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB

From having owned and used both the Tamron and Sigma lenses, the Sigma version has the far more effective autofocus response. The Sigma lens will handle a basketball fast break from the end line and properly track focus, while the Tamron lens can be indifferent under those conditions. Optically, the Tamron lens is a good performer,

Post #4, Jul 08, 2012 14:36:36




LOG IN TO REPLY
mr2step
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
mr2step's Avatar
Joined Sep 2008
416 posts
Ocala, Florida
[MORE/SHARE]

Great shots and insight. Both lenses looked good and the image were nice for being at ISO 6400. I appreciate the opinions. I will be using this lens for mainly concert shooting as I think I said before so low light tracking is a MUST.

Post #5, Jul 08, 2012 15:11:51 as a reply to DC Fan's post 35 minutes earlier.


Do what you love, and you will never work a day in your life.
www.Brettmissick.comexternal link

http://www.facebook.co​m/brettmissickphotogra​phyexternal linkhttp://www.facebook.co​m/brettmissickphotogra​phyexternal linkhttp://www.brettmissic​k.wordpress.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
applstew
Member
Joined Dec 2011
68 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I use the Canon 70-300 4-5.6 IS USM which by know means is a fast as some of the Canon or Sigma lens you are looking at, but find myself stopping it down to 5.6 and shooting somewhere in the range of 1/320 ISO 3200. I haven't had any issues with low light tracking when I shoot concerts or shows. Plenty sharp in my opinion. http://www.flickr.com ...w/sets/721576304386​60180/external link

All shot with said lens.

Post #6, Jul 11, 2012 21:00:36




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,649 views & 0 likes for this thread
ISO user advice for Tamron 70-200 2.8
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Performing Arts Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00103 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
784 guests, 508 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is PhotoKraze

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.