Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Astronomy & Celestial Talk
Thread started 07 Jul 2012 (Saturday) 13:19
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

What exactly did I shoot?

 
armis
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2012
Jul 07, 2012 13:19 |  #1

I took a shot of the night sky on holiday, thinking I had the Milky Way. Turns out, well, it doesn't quite look like what I expected of the Milky Way (and what's that big cluster there top left?). Can you guys help me find out what I have here? I tried looking up a sky map but can't really figure out how it works.

Also, what are your thoughts on the processing? Too dark, too light, too much color, etc.?

Here's some relevant data: I was overlooking Mount Bromo (Indonesia) facing south-west, give or take (my exact coordinates were 7.921831 S, 112.963445 E and you can see ). This was taken on June 13 around midnight local time - 4 pm GMT if I'm not mistaken.

Thanks! :)

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Fuji X-E1, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms
www.wtbphoto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
CameraMan's Avatar
12,506 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Dec 2010
In The Sticks
Jul 07, 2012 13:26 |  #2

I'm pretty sure that'd be the Milky Way. If you're in a dark location it's almost identifiable without the camera but you've gotten a nice shot of it here. Color looks good. You have a great shot here with the exception of what looks like cloud cover on the left.


Atlanta Wedding Photographerexternal link | The Toys! | Facebookexternal link | Videoexternal link | Flickrexternal link
“I believe the appropriate metaphor here involves a river of excrement and a Native American water vessel without any means of propulsion.”
― Sheldon Cooper

LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2012
Jul 07, 2012 13:41 |  #3

CameraMan wrote in post #14683895external link
I'm pretty sure that'd be the Milky Way. If you're in a dark location it's almost identifiable without the camera but you've gotten a nice shot of it here. Color looks good. You have a great shot here with the exception of what looks like cloud cover on the left.

Yeah, those were clouds. Only one night there though, so I took what I had (also, to be honest, I didn't really see them during the shoot, since it was so dark).

Huh, I kind of expected to see the classic almond-shaped cloud of light barred by the dark line along its length. Would I have needed more exposures to see all that?


Fuji X-E1, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms
www.wtbphoto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
CameraMan's Avatar
12,506 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Joined Dec 2010
In The Sticks
Jul 07, 2012 19:25 |  #4

How long was your exposure for this shot? Looks like you had the shutter open for quite a while.


Atlanta Wedding Photographerexternal link | The Toys! | Facebookexternal link | Videoexternal link | Flickrexternal link
“I believe the appropriate metaphor here involves a river of excrement and a Native American water vessel without any means of propulsion.”
― Sheldon Cooper

LOG IN TO REPLY
SteveInNZ
Goldmember
1,370 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Auckland, New Zealand
Jul 08, 2012 00:48 |  #5

It's a bit hard to tell but it looks to me like the Eta Carina section of the Milky Way. Eta Carina is a fairly large area of gas glowing from newly formed stars. You have a pinkish glow that's about the right shape and there are some some groups of stars in the right place. If that's the case then the southern cross would be just outside of the shot in the top left corner. The bright one right in the corner is probably the bottom star of the cross. Yes, you have got a section of the milky way.


"Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.

LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2012
Jul 08, 2012 03:02 |  #6

CameraMan wrote in post #14685041 (external link)
How long was your exposure for this shot? Looks like you had the shutter open for quite a while.

I stacked 7 frames of between 10 and 20 seconds, ISO 3200 or 6400, f/2.8. I think DSS told me the total exposure time was around 2 minutes. I actually didn't go out thinking I was going to stack them (actually, wasn't even aware of the technique), which explains the uneven parameters of the shots. It's only when I read about DSS that I thought 'hey, maybe I could do that with all the crap I shot' :p.

@Steve: thanks! :)

Fiddled with some more stuff; better?

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Fuji X-E1, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms
www.wtbphoto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Desertraptor
Cream of the Crop
Desertraptor's Avatar
11,372 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Joined Jul 2005
Adelaide, Australia
Jul 08, 2012 03:28 |  #7

Nicely done


Peter
Canon 6D|60D|40D
Lens 10-22mm f2.8|50mm f 1.8|100mm f2.8 Macro

24-70mm f2.8|L100-400mm f4.5-5.6L
Flash 430EX II
Telescope Skywatcher 600mm ED80 f7.5 GEM EQ3

LOG IN TO REPLY
cyberon
Senior Member
cyberon's Avatar
540 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Perth, Australia
Jul 08, 2012 06:31 |  #8

This is the Eta Carina part of the Milky Way. Southern Cross will be near the top left corner of the image but is outside the frame.


500D, Speedlite 430EX II, Lens : 15-85mm; 50mm F1.8 II; 100mm F2.8L IS Macro; 70-200mm F4L; Samyang 8mm F3.5
U/W : G11, OEM Housing, Inon S2000, Inon D4 Tray, Inon UCL-165 Close up lens
Astro : Modded 1100D, ES 80ED, Skywatcher HEQ5 Mount, Astrotrac TT320X-AG, Astronomik CLS Clip in filter

LOG IN TO REPLY
armis
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2012
Jul 09, 2012 03:05 |  #9

Cool, thanks for the info (and the kind words :)). So I need to go even wider to get the entire thing? What's the longest lens with which you can get the entire Milky Way in the frame (on a FF camera)?


Fuji X-E1, 18-55 and 55-200 zooms
www.wtbphoto.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Lowner's Avatar
12,924 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Salisbury, UK.
Jul 09, 2012 03:41 as a reply to armis's post |  #10

The milky way surrounds our planet, so it will fill the visible sky and then some! So lens wise you need to select something that shoots the whole sky if you want as much as possible in one shot.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
e.shell
Member
46 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Lehigh University
Jul 13, 2012 11:49 |  #11

great shot! I never thought of staking those photos either!


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>E.SHELLDESIGNS.COMexternal link<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,301 views & 0 likes for this thread
What exactly did I shoot?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Astronomy & Celestial Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00095 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is atlbraves1177
738 guests, 481 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016