![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
Just curious how people feel about either or. Ive had a fascination with wedding photography ever since my wife and I & our friends got married a few years back. Been working out of town for the last 4 years and recently got transferred home, so Id like to just go out and shoot. Sold my 15-85 because I wanted a more specific lens such as the 17-55 2.8 or 70-200 f4 IS. My question is, for a 3 lens starter set, I was thinking :
-canon 17-55 2.8 IS (general wedding lens) just ordered -canon 85mm 1.8 (indoor reception/low light/portrait lens) -70-200 f4 IS (long church shots with low lighting, nice outdoor far off shots) Just curious if this is going to get me on the right path.
__________________
"A creative man is motivated by the desire to achieve, not by the desire to beat others" |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Nice lens selection. Now you need..some lens back up.. a flash back up and a back up camera
__________________
www.steelcityphotography.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,106
|
I use zooms inside and primes outside....as well as primes inside and zooms outside.
If you plan on using the 70-200 f/4 for indoor church low light situations, you'll be wishing you had the 2.8.
__________________
Gear List |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Man I Like to Fart
|
I'd get the f2.8 version of the 70-200. Find a used 70-200 f2.8 IS MKI. You'll appreciate the extra stop for indoor ceremonies.
__________________
NYC Wedding Photographer | Blog | facebook | Galleries | Flickr | Gear My 5D Mark III Review |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
Posts: 1,235
|
Primes inside and primes outside.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Goldmember
|
Zooms inside and out. I have two primes. The 100 Marco takes amazing Macro shots. The 50 1.4 is just slow. I wouldn't use it for weddings unless I absolutely could not use flash and couldn't get the shots I need from my 70-200 2.8 and need the faster prime. But since it's so slow in focusing it's hardly a step up and I'd much rather crank up my ISO with the 70-200.
Now if I had an L prime this would be a whole different reply! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
That's a good start but if I were you I'd get the 2.8 70-200 - if budget is an issue get the Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS because it's a great lens and a tad bit better than the Canon MK1
__________________
Scotland Wedding Photographer |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Light Bringer
|
A prime gives you 1-2 more stops, that won't really help all that much in a dark reception. You need to learn to light instead, and have appropriate equipment. I've detailed how I do it here.
__________________
NZIPP Qualified Professional wedding photographer.
Camera and Lens Reviews ~ Wellington Wedding Photographer Wellington Wedding Photographer (site2) ~ Wellington Wedding Photographer (site3) Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 40
|
My wife started with those two zoom lenses... But we eventually wished that we had the 2.8 version of the 70-200. (Though after she upgraded to the 5D mark iii, f4 was fine since she could go to higher ISO. She kept the lens, since the 2.8 is bulky/heavier)
Honestly, I'd hold off on the 85mm and get the 70-200 2.8. (The 70-200 does a good job as a portrait lens) Once you have the cash, my next purchase would be a 100mm IS macro. Great for macro shots as well as portraits. Obviously you'll need flash at receptions... And the 17-55 is the perfect reception lens. I really with they made an EF/L series version! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 231
|
I second what tim said regarding lighting being more important for wedding work. That said, 70-200 2.8 is great for church ceremonies where flash is not allowed.
__________________
Ottawa Wedding Photographer |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
|
__________________
[mike and frida] photography - we shoot stuff.
chicago wedding photography | chicago wedding photography blog |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 442
|
I use primes for the image quality over zooms, the difference in light is negligible, because with a razor thin DOF, you arent going to get moving shots.
__________________
Please "like" us on Facebook Here Santa Clarita Wedding Photographers - Michael Anthony Photography Los Angeles Photography Blog 5d Mark III 5d Mark II Canon 35mm F/1.4L Canon 50mm F/1.2L Canon 85mm F/1.2L Canon 70-200mm F/2.8L IS II Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 Lights, lots of em. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
I prefer primes inside and primes outside.
__________________
www.steelcityphotography.com |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Zooms for Primes | dtufino | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 31 | 25th of October 2011 (Tue) 14:48 |
| Who's addicted to fast primes and rather gives up his 2.8 zooms for faster primes ? | CanonYouCan | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 55 | 21st of January 2011 (Fri) 02:42 |
| From Zooms to Primes | Dysfunctnlretard | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 34 | 9th of April 2010 (Fri) 01:40 |
| Primes vs. Zooms | ChrisMc73 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 47 | 28th of April 2009 (Tue) 19:29 |
| Primes vs zooms | grunta | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 25 | 3rd of January 2006 (Tue) 07:48 |