Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories
Thread started 13 Jul 2012 (Friday) 18:34
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Eyepiece Extender for 7D, 5D Mark III

 
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
tvphotog's Avatar
6,091 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2007
New York City
Jul 13, 2012 18:34 |  #1

I found an excellent extender, after market, for the two cameras where there's a need to get your nose off the LCD screen. It's about time someone did this.

This one is available on Amazon (external link) and on eBay for about the same price of $15, which is very good compared to the OEM piece...if it existed. The advantage of the Amazon piece is that it comes with a microfiber cloth for use anywhere.

This one comes in two pieces, which in the picture are assembled. The outer piece is almost identical to the OEM Canon eyepiece. The inner one, next to the camera body, contains lenses that will distort and reduce your view. Combined, the two pieces are about 1 mm thicker than the Canon EP EX II and eyepiece combination which I have on my 5D2. The extender really takes your nose off the LCD on both the 7D and the 5D3.

I found the best way to use it is to slip the two pieces apart, and remove the two Philips screws that hold a shim which then holds in the lenses. Pop out the lenses, throw them out, and reassemble with the screws and re-slide the pieces together. You can easily still see all four corners of the screen without any size reduction or distortion.

I put two small pieces of gaffer tape between the two pieces of the extender, and on the back of the extender piece which touches the body. That really stops the movement of both on one another, and makes a really firm extender, that can still be removed from the body if you want. Use gaffer's tape, not duct tape. The latter has glue that will stick to whatever it's on when the tape is removed.

IMAGE: http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b87/maxselma/IMG_1959.jpg

IMAGE: http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b87/maxselma/IMG_1960.jpg

IMAGE: http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b87/maxselma/IMG_1961.jpg

Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D III | 5DS/R | Powershot S100 | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
klr.b
Goldmember
2,509 posts
Joined Jun 2009
SoCal
Jul 14, 2012 00:59 |  #2

I bought one of these back in April. It was only $12 back then, so I took a shot. I would rate the quality as worse than the Canon extenders. If you look closely, you can tell that it doesn't quite match the camera body. The optics were lousy compared to Canon. Just for kicks, I tried cleaning the lenses. There was no difference. I would compare it to smudgy hand prints on a window. I saw this as a moot point since I (and most people) would remove them anyway. If you need the reducer lenses, I would think twice about purchasing. If just want to extend your eyepiece a bit, it's fine.

I was hoping to use this extender with my HoodEye, but they're not compatible out of the box. You have to cut a ridge and grind off a lot of material on the extender. It's a bit of work, buy you can get them to fit together.


gordon
Gear and Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
julius071
Senior Member
496 posts
Joined Feb 2012
Seattle, WA
Jul 14, 2012 05:12 |  #3

Well I hope canon comes up with something because I hate to clean my LCD everytime I take a shot.


Capturing moments one snap at a time.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrew_WOT
Goldmember
1,418 posts
Joined Mar 2010
CA
Jul 14, 2012 11:51 as a reply to julius071's post |  #4

HoodEye Eye cup

IMAGE: http://www.hoodmanusa.com/images/hoodeye1.jpg



LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
tvphotog's Avatar
6,091 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2007
New York City
Jul 14, 2012 12:38 |  #5

Andrew_WOT wrote in post #14715740 (external link)
HoodEye Eye cup

QUOTED IMAGE

Blocks the LCD; must rotate and then miss the vertical shot. Good idea, poor execution, IMO.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D III | 5DS/R | Powershot S100 | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrew_WOT
Goldmember
1,418 posts
Joined Mar 2010
CA
Jul 14, 2012 14:35 |  #6

tvphotog wrote in post #14715869external link
Blocks the LCD; must rotate and then miss the vertical shot. Good idea, poor execution, IMO.

Was that your experience?
I am quite surprised as I've never had to rotate if for vertical shots as rubber is very soft and just molds around eyebrow. You can twist it if you want to but I personally have never felt the need for it. Yes, at straight on angle of view it block tiny pinch of the LCD edge, again, never found it bothering me a tiny bit, shoot in Live View with it on all the times.




LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
tvphotog's Avatar
6,091 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2007
New York City
Jul 14, 2012 16:42 |  #7

klr.b wrote in post #14714319external link
I bought one of these back in April. It was only $12 back then, so I took a shot. I would rate the quality as worse than the Canon extenders. If you look closely, you can tell that it doesn't quite match the camera body. The optics were lousy compared to Canon. Just for kicks, I tried cleaning the lenses. There was no difference. I would compare it to smudgy hand prints on a window. I saw this as a moot point since I (and most people) would remove them anyway. If you need the reducer lenses, I would think twice about purchasing. If just want to extend your eyepiece a bit, it's fine.

I was hoping to use this extender with my HoodEye, but they're not compatible out of the box. You have to cut a ridge and grind off a lot of material on the extender. It's a bit of work, buy you can get them to fit together.

I wasn't concerned with whether it matches the contour of the camera exactly, but that it got my nose off the back of the camera. And it's only off in the upper left corner, otherwise it fits perfectly.

You should not even consider leaving the lenses in place.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D III | 5DS/R | Powershot S100 | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

LOG IN TO REPLY
KRUSH
Goldmember
KRUSH's Avatar
1,257 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Jul 15, 2012 16:09 |  #8

How difficult is it to get those phillip screws out of the EP-EX15 II?
I tried and found it to be very difficult. I imagine it would be the same for this piece.


The presence of the observer changes the nature of the observed...
Canon EOS 5D Mk II | Gear List & Feedback
For Sale: Canon S5 IS |

LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
tvphotog's Avatar
6,091 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2007
New York City
Jul 15, 2012 16:21 |  #9

KRUSH wrote in post #14720456external link
How difficult is it to get those phillip screws out of the EP-EX15 II?
I tried and found it to be very difficult. I imagine it would be the same for this piece.

Very easy, but I have a set of watchmater Phillips screwdrivers.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D III | 5DS/R | Powershot S100 | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

LOG IN TO REPLY
pbelarge
Goldmember
pbelarge's Avatar
2,834 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Westchester County, NY
Jul 15, 2012 18:46 |  #10

tvphotog wrote in post #14715869external link
Blocks the LCD; must rotate and then miss the vertical shot. Good idea, poor execution, IMO.

The part blocking the LCD is not really necessary for the function, and can be trimmed slightly.

I do not rotate it when I shoot vertically, so far it has not been terribly inconvenient.

I like the Hoodman eyecup, it works very well for me (I wear glasses) and blocks the sun from interfering with my seeing the viewfinder properly. I liked it so much on the 7D, I bought one for the 5D3.
They are quite pliable as well.
One issue which I do not like about it though is when I use my top entrance shoulder bags - I wonder how long it will hold up to the putting it in/taking it out and rubbing against the zipper?


just a few of my thoughts...
Pierre

LOG IN TO REPLY
JakAHearts
Cream of the Crop
JakAHearts's Avatar
Joined Sep 2010
Silver Spring, MD
Jul 16, 2012 13:36 |  #11

Same here. I dont rotate mine and rather enjoy it. I might trim the bottom as sometimes its in the way a bit when trying to view the LCD but it hasnt been annoying enough to do so.


Shane
flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrew_WOT
Goldmember
1,418 posts
Joined Mar 2010
CA
Jul 16, 2012 15:17 |  #12

JakAHearts wrote in post #14724612external link
Same here. I dont rotate mine and rather enjoy it. I might trim the bottom as sometimes its in the way a bit when trying to view the LCD but it hasnt been annoying enough to do so.

The blocked part (the very edge of LCD) usually doesn't have anything critically important and if it does, simple angle of view adjustment let you see what's there. On portrait with landscape orientation, they could as well just made eye cup round, it would continue functioning the same, it's equally comfortable rotated or not.




LOG IN TO REPLY
JakAHearts
Cream of the Crop
JakAHearts's Avatar
Joined Sep 2010
Silver Spring, MD
Jul 16, 2012 15:36 |  #13

I agree. Sometimes if youre in sunlight, its not possible to tilt it, but ya know, nothing is perfect. :D


Shane
flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
julius071
Senior Member
496 posts
Joined Feb 2012
Seattle, WA
Jul 19, 2012 23:54 |  #14

This eye from OP is great! It was very tight once I put it on, shaved some plastic off and now it fits like a glove. No more nose smashing into my 5d Mark III!!!


Capturing moments one snap at a time.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Silverstonev8
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2011
New Jersey
Jul 20, 2012 18:14 |  #15

julius071 wrote in post #14742948external link
This eye from OP is great! It was very tight once I put it on, shaved some plastic off and now it fits like a glove. No more nose smashing into my 5d Mark III!!!

Agreed. Mine was delivered yesterday...


Chris -- Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

7,915 views & 0 likes for this thread
Eyepiece Extender for 7D, 5D Mark III
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00137 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is R Krueger
759 guests, 531 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016