![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,497
|
What are your thoughts? Do you think it would be a good choice for those of us who like to make bird photos?
__________________
Wow do I have a lot to learn! The Chosen Spot, NY 50D, EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS USM, EF-S 17-85 f4-5.6 IS USM, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, EF 1.4X III Extender, Flight Brace |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Yeah, it would certainly get the job done. The 1D series has always been a great birding camera. The 5D mkIII might have a little more reach, but has significantly less fps, which could make a difference in catching the wings of a bird in flight at just the right position, or it just about to touch down at it's nest.
The 7D also has more reach than either, but maybe not as good an AF system (good though it is, it isn't the latest and greatest anymore). Personally, I think any of those three cameras will make a good bird camera. I think my personal choice would be the 5D mkIII, the AF is great, good reach and I can live with a slower frame rate as the extra couple of grand saved will buy some nice glass. But, yeah, the 1DX will do a great job if money isn't an issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,497
|
Thank you for your thoughtful response. I've decided against the 7D and am looking at the 1D series, but really only the 1DX right now, based upon image quality.
Money is always an issue, but that doesn't stop a girl from window shopping.
__________________
Wow do I have a lot to learn! The Chosen Spot, NY 50D, EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS USM, EF-S 17-85 f4-5.6 IS USM, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, EF 1.4X III Extender, Flight Brace |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
For birding. I would get a 1DMKIV and not think twice about it. Its an excellent camera and the 1.3 format and the extra reach is a bonus over a 1Dx when it comes to birding. you can find clean low count 1DMKIv's for 3400.00 or less........Take the extra 3500.00 and find a clean 500F/4 and your set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Goldmember
|
i completely agree.
for about $3500 you cant find a better birding camera than a 1d4. the 1dx isnt significantly better for this use. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cameron Park, Ca.
Posts: 1,451
|
1DX and 5DIII will make your lenses shorter. So will the 1DIV, just not as short. If your longest lens is 400mm, go with the 1DIV. What is wrong with a 7D?
__________________
Regards, Chuck |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Plus, you get AF at f8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,497
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Good point. Thank you Frank.
__________________
Wow do I have a lot to learn! The Chosen Spot, NY 50D, EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS USM, EF-S 17-85 f4-5.6 IS USM, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, EF 1.4X III Extender, Flight Brace |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Goldmember
|
Quote:
However, if you are comparing the 7d to your 50d, "significant upgrade" would be putting it mildly. Higher useable ISO, better AF system with numerous choices in AF mode, higher FPS, better construction, better resolution, better LCDs, better handling. There is little on the 7d that isn't better than the 50d. So, IMHO, it would be a tremendously significant upgrade. Additionally, selling your 50d (approx. $500) and buying a used 7d on here (approx. $1000), would put the cost at roughly $5-600 - much more bang for the buck than you'll get shelling out $3500 for a used Mk IV. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,497
|
Quote:
__________________
Wow do I have a lot to learn! The Chosen Spot, NY 50D, EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS USM, EF-S 17-85 f4-5.6 IS USM, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, EF 1.4X III Extender, Flight Brace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Quote:
Yes, photographing a static sunny scene, filling the frame, at f/8, 1/500th, ISO 100 etc., you will be hard pressed to see any IQ difference and both cameras will get the shot. But in the frequently less than ideal conditions often encountered when birding, when less cropping, more accurate AF, faster FPS, faster shutter speed etc., come into play it is a different matter. The 7D will deliver sharp shots where the 50D is delivering blurry ones. To me, that makes a significant difference in IQ. Now, I'm not saying that the 5D III, 1Dx, 1DIV etc. don't also offer these advantages because they do. Just don't discount the 7D as not delivering better IQ just because the shots would be similar, testing in good conditions. Birding is a whole different ballgame. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Goldmember
|
Was gonna go there sandpiper, but decided to stop at good enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,497
|
Quote:
I truly appreciate the thought and consideration you have given to your input. All too often comments are a mere word or two and do not provide good insight. Thanks
__________________
Wow do I have a lot to learn! The Chosen Spot, NY 50D, EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS USM, EF-S 17-85 f4-5.6 IS USM, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, EF 1.4X III Extender, Flight Brace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,497
|
If anyone else has ideas on the 1DX I would greatly appreciate your input. Thanks!
__________________
Wow do I have a lot to learn! The Chosen Spot, NY 50D, EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS USM, EF-S 17-85 f4-5.6 IS USM, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, EF 1.4X III Extender, Flight Brace |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ladybrand OFS RSA
Posts: 81
|
Not just my 2c's worth but from my own experience having owned both the 50D and 7D, I practically gave my 7D away without any regret (reach or no reach) after getting a 1D Mk IV which opened up a whole new world for me in BIF.
In practice wether it's just my technique or not, the more pixels on target theory offered so often, just doesn't hold any water be it in birding or my other interest macro when comparing the 7D to the MK IV. So to the OP my personal advice is, dont waste time and money on the 7D, wait for right MK IV to come along and if you really want the best of both worlds pair it up with a 5D MK iii for the same price as a 1DX.
__________________
1D MK IV 5D MK III 17-40L 70-200 F4L 100L 300 F2.8L 500 F4L Sigma 180 Macro |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Many types of D | RiverCottage | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 14 | 6th of July 2008 (Sun) 15:44 |
| Your thoughts on my 70-200L 2.8 bird pics | ben4633 | Critique Corner | 4 | 27th of July 2007 (Fri) 09:07 |
| types of USM | reemas | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 3 | 4th of April 2005 (Mon) 21:25 |
| Tin Types . . . | RJSorensen | People | 12 | 28th of March 2005 (Mon) 17:34 |