Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Equipment Talk' section > Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1st of September 2012 (Sat)   #1
kevindar
Goldmember
 
kevindar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: california
Posts: 4,944
Default Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

there was a good deal for a new 70-300L, and in a moment of weakness, i ordered on. received the lens yesterday, and have been shooting a little with it.
Initial impressions:
out of the box, the lens is nice and compact, though not very light. built is excellent. It packs well. It is very well built. it extends while zooming, but overall balances well on a 5d3.
The focus and zoom ring are in reverse order. very annoying.
Focus is very fast and very quiet.
Image quality is excellent with good color and contrast, and sharp at 300 mm and 5.6. image stablization is very effective, 3-4 stops.
things I dont like.
1. The reverse order of zoom and focus as mentioned.
2. The lens feels heavy after a while, at least compared to 70-200 f4L IS
3. I did not think i would care about variable aperture, but I do. right now my 100-400L is my only other variable aperture, and thats almost always at 400mm
4. It does not like my taped kenko 300 DG 1.4x extender. even though it does autofocus on the 5d3 its very jittery, hunting back and forth. in comparison, my 100-400L locks confidently and tracks like a champ with the extender.

I am not sure if I am going to keep it. the 70-200 f4L is is stellar for walking around, and I think I prefer it over the 70-300. on full frame, I find that if 200 is not long enough, I would usually like to have 400. I may have felt differently If I was shooting with a cropper.
I may end up doing some comparison shots later.
In the meantime, here are a couple of shots.


__________________
My Flickr
Gear List
kevindar is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 1st of September 2012 (Sat)   #2
KarlGB77
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Delaware
Posts: 556
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

I found the same thing Kevin when I had mine.
Although I used it almost not at all, I was hard pressed to put it on my 5D2 (at the time, now a 5D3 as well), but having the 70-200 f4 IS and the 2.8 Mark II, I didn't see enough to merit keeping it.
But it is 300mm and it is affordble so it is a good option.
Tried the 2X III Extenders as well and I now think that the 400 5.6 is the one I want now for the reach.
__________________
Canon 5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, T2i (2), 24-105 f4LIS, 17-40 f4L, 70-200f4L IS, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 100 2.8, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 50 1.8, 15-85 f4-5.6 IS, 60 2.8, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS, 430 EX II, 580 EX II, Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod w/ 498RC2, Calumet 8121 Tripod, Manfrotto 679B Monopod w/ 234 RC2 head
KarlGB77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #3
Scott M
Goldmember
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,235
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

It certainly looks like a quality lens. However, if you already own a 70-200 f/4 IS and 100-400L, then it's also very redundant, IMO.
__________________
Photo Gallery

Gear List
Scott M is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #4
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
 
cdifoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 34,005
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

70-300L? Never heard of it. Looked at B&H and it doesn't seem to exist.
__________________
Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!
cdifoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #5
renfield
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdifoto View Post
70-300L? Never heard of it. Looked at B&H and it doesn't seem to exist.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...4_5_6L_IS.html
renfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #6
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
 
cdifoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 34,005
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by renfield View Post
That's odd. I typed in ef 70-300 and all I got was the consumer and DO versions.

Edit: Never mind. It was on page two...past the covers...which makes no sense whatsoever.
__________________
Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!

Last edited by cdifoto : 2nd of September 2012 (Sun) at 08:03.
cdifoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #7
ateet
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 271
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

I also ordered on same Adorama deal last week which was excellent deal IMO. I would never pay more than $1300 for this lens.

Got rid of 70-200 f4 IS. Kind of sad, but I think in terms of IQ, it is almost the same. Have to use it more outside to see real differences, if they exist and I doubt they do.
__________________
Canon 5D Mk III | EF 24-70L II | EF 135L | EF 70-300L | EF 50mm f/1.8 | 580EX II
ateet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #8
kevindar
Goldmember
 
kevindar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: california
Posts: 4,944
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateet View Post
I also ordered on same Adorama deal last week which was excellent deal IMO. I would never pay more than $1300 for this lens.

Got rid of 70-200 f4 IS. Kind of sad, but I think in terms of IQ, it is almost the same. Have to use it more outside to see real differences, if they exist and I doubt they do.
Yeah, it was the price of average used copy, so I figured its a free test to see how much I like it. I thought the introductory price of 1500 was ridiculous honestly, given the price of 100-400L.
I think when all is said an done, on a full frame, I will favor my 70-200. I think its perfect for portrait and landscape, and lighter. and as I said, on a full frame if 200 is not enough, I usually want the 400. I will however try to get some hummingbird shots with it and play with it a little more before it makes its way to the buy and sell forum.
__________________
My Flickr
Gear List
kevindar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #9
gocolts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,127
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by ateet View Post
I also ordered on same Adorama deal last week which was excellent deal IMO. I would never pay more than $1300 for this lens.

Got rid of 70-200 f4 IS. Kind of sad, but I think in terms of IQ, it is almost the same. Have to use it more outside to see real differences, if they exist and I doubt they do.
I bought on this Adorama deal as well. Great lens, and the 4 stop IS, combined with the light weight of the lens, makes hand holding down to incredible levels possible.
gocolts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #10
Bearmann
Member
 
Bearmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: I live behind Graceland in a tool shed. I often meet the man early in the morning at Krispy Kreme.
Posts: 838
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

I bought one too. I'm planning on selling my 100-400L. The 70-300L is only slightly sharper than the 100-400, but noticibly so off center at 300mm. I like the 4 stop IS, and it focuses more quickly than the 100-400. I'm not fond of the zoom ring position or width, but hope to adapt. And the slightly lighter weight is nice too when it's in my camera bag. When the 100-400L II comes out, I'll re-evavluate.
__________________
Barry

http://b-r-s-photo.zenfolio.com (remove the dashes)
Bearmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #11
jrbdmb
Senior Member
 
jrbdmb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,227
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

I had a 70-200 f4L, now I have the 70-300L, no regrets. Image quality is very similar, and I find I use the 200-300 range a lot. Shorter length is nice too (but offset somewhat by the extra weight).
__________________
Tools: 70D, 10-22, Tamron 24-70 VC, 70-300L, 135 f2L
jrbdmb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #12
jnadz
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 240
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

I had one and loved it with my 7d but then all my gear was stolen... I started over after the insurance settled up and I just bought one back from the canon refurb site when they had the extra 15% off for $1080 plus tax... Great deal since used ones seem to go for around $1200.

I like the range better on the 7d (I replaced it with a 5D3) but due to its compact size, I still love it for travel and for my sons outdoor sports.
jnadz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #13
sebr
Goldmember
 
sebr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sweden/France
Posts: 4,542
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

I am very happy with my 70-300L. Sharpness, contrast and color rendition are excellent, focus is fast and silent, and it balances really well on the 5D2. IS is very efficient. I also have a 70-200/2.8L IS II and the 2 lenses have similar IQ. Of course, the 70-200 has an aperture advantages and it is my most used lens for this reason. I am keeping the 70-300 for when I need a smaller lens to carry around, or a bit more reach...
__________________
Sebastien
5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; Σ85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXII
M ; 22/2.0 STM ; EF adapter
Benron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjällräven backpack
sebr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #14
ateet
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 271
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevindar View Post
Yeah, it was the price of average used copy, so I figured its a free test to see how much I like it. I thought the introductory price of 1500 was ridiculous honestly, given the price of 100-400L.
I think when all is said an done, on a full frame, I will favor my 70-200. I think its perfect for portrait and landscape, and lighter. and as I said, on a full frame if 200 is not enough, I usually want the 400. I will however try to get some hummingbird shots with it and play with it a little more before it makes its way to the buy and sell forum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gocolts View Post
I bought on this Adorama deal as well. Great lens, and the 4 stop IS, combined with the light weight of the lens, makes hand holding down to incredible levels possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearmann View Post
I bought one too. I'm planning on selling my 100-400L. The 70-300L is only slightly sharper than the 100-400, but noticibly so off center at 300mm. I like the 4 stop IS, and it focuses more quickly than the 100-400. I'm not fond of the zoom ring position or width, but hope to adapt. And the slightly lighter weight is nice too when it's in my camera bag. When the 100-400L II comes out, I'll re-evavluate.
I guess this is one of the best deals recently on brand new Canon L lens from authorized seller in recent memory. I got some cashback as well, so hopefully I'll be able to cash it all in by end of the year and $1180 after everything said and done for this lens is an amazing deal.

I am no professional by any means and just shoot pictures of my 2 year old daugther. I went to Philadelphia Zoo recently and didn't take my 70-200 f/4L IS. I think due to 70-300L lens size, I should be able to take it to more places more often. I didn't take many pictures yet with this lens, but sure it seems amazing one.
__________________
Canon 5D Mk III | EF 24-70L II | EF 135L | EF 70-300L | EF 50mm f/1.8 | 580EX II
ateet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd of September 2012 (Sun)   #15
Christina.DazzleByDesign
Senior Member
 
Christina.DazzleByDesign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,973
Default Re: Canon 70-300L, initial thoughts

I love mine Its fast, accurate, great IQ (on par with the 70-200 2.8 II - I've owned both, sold the 2.8 II since I didn't need the aperture for the price - and can't tell a difference in IQ between photos of each), the IS is easily 4 stops, and DEAD SILENT (literally, head to press my ear to the barrel of the lens to check it was working the faint clicking sound can only be heard when you put your ear that close).

I don't mind the reversed zoom/focus ring. I figured they designed it that way because of how compact the lens is - on a longer lens, the zoom ring would be roughly where our hand sits now on the 70-300L for the zoom ring - if they had made it come "first" then your hand would be awkwardly close to the camera body, on a lens this compact. That is my theory, anyway.

The focal length is just perfect for what I needed from leaving a crop for FF. It's a sadly overlooked lens, yet delivers so much I'm having fun using it for equestrian sports, and now wildlife and bugs - an area of photography I hadn't really explored until I got this lens
__________________
5D3 | 7D | 85L II | 70-300L | 24-105L | Nifty Fifty | 600EX-RT
__________________________________________________
Christina.DazzleByDesign is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
From T3i to 5D2...initial thoughts foster2380 Canon EOS Digital Cameras 18 25th of April 2012 (Wed) 08:08
Initial thoughts after first 4 weeks with my 7D lmyamen Canon EOS Digital Cameras 22 18th of December 2010 (Sat) 13:40
good news, they are not sticking to the initial $1500 for the 70-300L wombatHorror Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 25 27th of October 2010 (Wed) 02:37
New 40D initial thoughts packpe89 Canon EOS Digital Cameras 9 10th of October 2008 (Fri) 07:56
initial brief markIII thoughts jlbrach Canon EOS Digital Cameras 1 22nd of June 2007 (Fri) 15:46


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:53.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.