LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


6D - Your thoughts on EF-S lenses

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 17 Sep 2012 (Monday) 13:51   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
FEChariot
Goldmember
FEChariot's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
3,120 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

First off, No, I am not talking about using EF-S lenses on the new 6D in this thread.

OK So the new 6D full frame camera has been announced and I will say that I am not interested in that. The 7D still does what I need it to do. But I am interesting in hearing other people's opinions on buying a bunch of EF-S lenses. I'll just call them crop only lenses from here on so that we include the third party ones in the discussion.

Me personally, I currently have 3 crop lenses, well 5 if you include the kit lenses that my wife uses on the Rebel Xt. I am looking into getting an UWA next so that pretty much by definition will be a crop lens too to bring me to 6 total.

What do you think will happen to value of these crop lenses on the used market over time now that Canon, Sony, and Nikon are making the FF jump a smaller leap? Pure economic theory would suggest a lower demand for used crop lenses and thus a lower price on the used market, but reality may be different. What do you think? Even though I'm not going to be buying a 6D, there may be a time when the 5D3 becomes cheap enough or the future 6d2 or 5d4 make me want to jump to full frame and then I am going to want to the the crop lenses.

Post #1, Sep 17, 2012 13:51:54


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
krb
Cream of the Crop
krb's Avatar
Joined Jun 2008
8,818 posts
Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together
[MORE/SHARE]

Making purchase decisions today based on a vague notion that you might want something else in the future is a good way to not have the tools that you need today.

Besides, I don't see the prices dropping any time soon.

Post #2, Sep 17, 2012 13:56:01


-- Ken
Comment and critique is always appreciated!
Flickrexternal link
Gear list

LOG IN TO REPLY
Rush87
Senior Member
Rush87's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
291 posts
Qc
[MORE/SHARE]

The new "affordable" FF cameras are still too expensive for most people. A rebel is 1/4 the price of a 6D. I don't think it will have any impact on the value of crop lenses in the next 5 years. I think we will need to see at least two new generations of FF cameras for them to really become "affordable".

Post #3, Sep 17, 2012 13:58:00




LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2006
26,383 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Until you see the rebel and XXD lines disappear I wouldnt worry too much about the future of ef-s lenses. This new full frame offering is still 4 times the cost of a starter rebel so its not like the entry camera market is suddenly going to erode, or be abandoned. The 6D is about the same price as a 5DII so its not as if canon is trying to drive the FF market price point downward.

Post #4, Sep 17, 2012 13:59:13




LOG IN TO REPLY
pulsar123
Goldmember
Joined Apr 2010
1,684 posts
Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

I think Nikon did the right move with their D600, and Canon will be forced to follow with 6DII, is that ther FF camera can take in crop-only lenses, and then the camera can be used as a crop camera (using only the central portion of the sensor). If this indeed will be the case, the used EF-S lenses should not suffer much, as crop lenses are usually much smaller, lighter and cheaper than FF lenses. I can see that 5-10 years down the road the cost difference between crop and FF sensor will become so small that there will be no crop sensor cameras; but they should be backward compatible with EF-S lenses.

Post #5, Sep 17, 2012 13:59:57


50D, 135L, Ʃ17-50mm f2.8 OS, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Ʃ10-20mm f4-5.6, 70-200 f4L, home studio

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
IanW
Goldmember
IanW's Avatar
Joined Nov 2005
1,219 posts
Wiltshire, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

pulsar123 wrote in post #15004341external link
I think Nikon did the right move with their D600, and Canon will be forced to follow with 6DII, is that ther FF camera can take in crop-only lenses, and then the camera can be used as a crop camera (using only the central portion of the sensor). If this indeed will be the case, the used EF-S lenses should not suffer much, as crop lenses are usually much smaller, lighter and cheaper than FF lenses. I can see that 5-10 years down the road the cost difference between crop and FF sensor will become so small that there will be no crop sensor cameras; but they should be backward compatible with EF-S lenses.

Did not realise that the D600 did this, good idea!

Surely the number of crops cameras far exceed the FF cameras out there due to cost. Sure this may change over time, but this must be a good number of years yet.

Post #6, Sep 17, 2012 14:04:47


Canon 5DIII | BG-E11 | 24-105mm f/4L | 70-200mm f2.8L IS II | 2x III | 430EX
Yongnuo YN-622C | Kenko Tubes | LEE Filters | Manfrotto 055CXPRO3+498RC2, 694CX

flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckless
Goldmember
Joined Mar 2012
2,212 posts
PEI, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

Ah, doesn't the EF-S standard allow for part of the lens to protrude deeper into the camera body than the normal EF standard, allowing the mirror to potentially strike on the lens if you attempt to use it on a full frame body?

Post #7, Sep 17, 2012 14:25:14


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Lucklessexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
FEChariot's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
3,120 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

gonzogolf wrote in post #15004338external link
Until you see the rebel and XXD lines disappear I wouldnt worry too much about the future of ef-s lenses.

To be clear, I am not worried about EF-s lenses going away completely, just curious to the value of used lenses becoming slightly less. A new 17-55 with canon lens hood costs $1100 now and a used one goes for ~$900 so a 20% drop in value. Will we see for instance a 30% drop two years down the road?

Post #8, Sep 17, 2012 14:38:01


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

LOG IN TO REPLY
NZed
Senior Member
Joined Mar 2011
115 posts
Victoria, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

I dont like the new back.

I find it ugly

IMAGE: http://www.dpreview.com/previews/canon-eos-6d/images/sbs-5diii-back.jpg

Post #9, Sep 17, 2012 14:44:19




LOG IN TO REPLY
jblaschke
Goldmember
jblaschke's Avatar
Joined Apr 2008
1,439 posts
New Braunfels, Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Luckless wrote in post #15004480external link
Ah, doesn't the EF-S standard allow for part of the lens to protrude deeper into the camera body than the normal EF standard, allowing the mirror to potentially strike on the lens if you attempt to use it on a full frame body?

I've always understood this is the main reason why Canon made the EF-S lenses incompatible with full frame bodies (without workarounds like extension tubes, etc.). Not entirely sure Canon CAN make them compatible with a 6D II or whatever.

That said, I own one EF-S lens, the 10-22, and it is a most excellent lens. It was the best option at the time. Turns out, it performs very well for infrared photography (even if it does have an odd color cast) in addition to visible light. We've got a 5D II and a 5D III now, but aren't planning on giving up the 7D any time soon. Different tools for different jobs (although we are going to be getting a FF ultrawide in the next year or so).

Post #10, Sep 17, 2012 14:47:04


Canon 7D | Canon 50D IR modified | Canon EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L | Canon FD 500mm 8.0 Reflex | Canon EF 85mm 1.8 | Canon EF 50mm 1.8 mk I | Canon EF-S 10-22mm | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Meade 645 (762mm f/5)
Model Mayhemexternal link
[COLOR=DarkRed]| DeviantArtexternal link | Lisa On Location: New Braunfels Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2006
26,383 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

FEChariot wrote in post #15004518external link
To be clear, I am not worried about EF-s lenses going away completely, just curious to the value of used lenses becoming slightly less. A new 17-55 with canon lens hood costs $1100 now and a used one goes for ~$900 so a 20% drop in value. Will we see for instance a 30% drop two years down the road?

Honestly no. For the price to drop you would need to see a significant drop in the number of folks using crop bodies. Just not going to happen.

Post #11, Sep 17, 2012 14:47:10




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Charlie
Cream of the Crop
Joined Sep 2007
7,326 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

if you do sell your stuff, I'de switch to the nikon D600 or 5D3...

Post #12, Sep 17, 2012 15:10:39


Flickrexternal link
Canon 6D | 24-105F4L | 70-200F2.8L IS Mkii | Rokinon 14 | 1.4x iii | 2x iii
Sony A7r | Canon FDn 24F2.8 | 50F1.2L | 85F1.2L | 135F2 | 100F4 Macro
Full Gear List and Helpful Links

LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
FEChariot's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
3,120 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Charlie wrote in post #15004700external link
if you do sell your stuff, I'de switch to the nikon D600 or 5D3...

Well another option would be to pick up a 5Dc instead of getting say a 10-22 and then trading the 17-50/2.8 in for a 17-40. This would cost me about the same as the 10-22 when all said and done.

Post #13, Sep 17, 2012 15:29:36


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Cream of the Crop
Joined Sep 2007
7,326 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

FEChariot wrote in post #15004804external link
Well another option would be to pick up a 5Dc instead of getting say a 10-22 and then trading the 17-50/2.8 in for a 17-40. This would cost me about the same as the 10-22 when all said and done.

right, that works as well if you're on a lower budget. If I didnt do video, I'de probably go that route.

Post #14, Sep 17, 2012 15:31:42


Flickrexternal link
Canon 6D | 24-105F4L | 70-200F2.8L IS Mkii | Rokinon 14 | 1.4x iii | 2x iii
Sony A7r | Canon FDn 24F2.8 | 50F1.2L | 85F1.2L | 135F2 | 100F4 Macro
Full Gear List and Helpful Links

LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2006
26,383 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

FEChariot wrote in post #15004804external link
Well another option would be to pick up a 5Dc instead of getting say a 10-22 and then trading the 17-50/2.8 in for a 17-40. This would cost me about the same as the 10-22 when all said and done.

I did that in reverse. I had a 17-40 that I was using on my 40D. I got the urge to go wide and considered getting a 10-22. But rather than spending $600 plus on a ef-s lens I bought a used 5D to turn my 17-40 into an ultrawide. Best gear decision I ever made.

Post #15, Sep 17, 2012 15:33:54




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
5,409 views & 0 likes for this thread
6D - Your thoughts on EF-S lenses
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.0009 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1137 guests, 888 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is dewaynelovesabby

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.