LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Lens For Italy

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Urban Life & Travel Talk
Thread started 24 Sep 2012 (Monday) 00:12   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
mine1
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
Joined Jun 2012
1,260 posts
Kalispell Montana
[MORE/SHARE]

I am going to Italy in January and will be in Rome, Florence, and Venice. So my question is this, I have a 60d and the kit 18-135, which is plenty long I think but I don't think it will be wide enough or fast enough for inside and cloudy Italy in January. I was wondering if anyone had any opinion if taking just a 15-85 would be wide enough for me so I could just take one lens. Or should I go with a 11-16 2.8 (figure the 2.8 is better for the weather and indoors that I am planing on than the more flare resistant cannon 10-22), and my 18-135. I would like to just take the one lens (15-85) but just not sure if it would be fast enough or wide enough for getting the good shots inside, and if it is really overcast. Any advice would be welcomed.

Post #1, Sep 24, 2012 00:12:48


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
colintf
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2012
255 posts
Bristol, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

another thing to bear in mind is distortion, unless you post procress each photo.
I find the 17-55f2.8 meets most of my needs for this kind of trip

Post #2, Sep 24, 2012 06:11:28




LOG IN TO REPLY
Apricane
Senior Member
Apricane's Avatar
Joined Nov 2011
738 posts
Canada's Federal Capital
[MORE/SHARE]

Looking at my very, very, old P&S pics of St. Peter's, I'd say that 15mm, 17mm, or 18mm on a crop should be sufficient on the wide end for your needs, at least for indoors (my widest pics at that time were at the 35mm equivalent of 34mm). As for aperture, it seems 2.7 wasn't enough for flash-less photography, although back then (six years ago, so it might have changed) it seems flash was allowed both in St. Peter's and in the Pantheon.

Looking at my pics from outside, I'd definitely wish to have at least a 15mm wide lens if I went back.

Post #3, Sep 24, 2012 06:41:19


Apricane 500pxexternal link flickrexternal link | 7D mk II | 70D | T2i | Speedlite 430EX II & 270EX II
15-85 | 70-300L | 24 f/2.8 STM | 35 f/2 IS | 40 f/2.8 | 60 f/2.8 | 100 f/2.8L Macro

LOG IN TO REPLY
artyH
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2009
1,833 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

There are a few places in Rome where 18 isn't wide enough - the Coliseum, Pantheon and Diocletian Baths come to mind. The 18-135 will be wide enough for just about everything else. The 15-85 may do it, but I am not sure about this. On my next trip to Italy, I plan to take my Tokina 12-24F4.
You can bump up ISO, so I wouldn't worry about the lighting in most cases if you use a lens with IS.
There were some places where you might need a faster lens, but f2.8 wouldn't be enough then. Consider a fast, shorter prime.
For me, wide was more important in Italy than long. The streets are narrow and the buildings are large.

Post #4, Sep 24, 2012 09:21:45




LOG IN TO REPLY
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
Joined Jun 2012
1,260 posts
Kalispell Montana
[MORE/SHARE]

yah I wanted at the minimum 15mm. but had not thought about the fact that without is that 11-16 might actually be slower than the 15-85 at 15mm (which is where I figure most of my pictures would be at.

Post #5, Sep 24, 2012 10:22:50 as a reply to artyH's post 1 hour earlier.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
Joined Jun 2012
1,260 posts
Kalispell Montana
[MORE/SHARE]

and as far as a prime goes I don't' think there are any ones wide enough. I don't have any interest in shooting people so no need to zoom in on there face. but if there is like a 15mm or less fast prime I might consider that because I plan on most of my shots to be at what ever the widest setting I have is.

Post #6, Sep 24, 2012 10:25:35 as a reply to mine1's post 2 minutes earlier.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Voaky999
Goldmember
Voaky999's Avatar
Joined Nov 2010
2,545 posts
Edmonton,AB
[MORE/SHARE]

Just back from Italy, you will need something wide wide wide. Narrow streets etc. give lots of opportunity for great shots. Get a 10-22.

Post #7, Sep 24, 2012 10:25:35


Don
I want a seat where I can see the hands of the pianist

LOG IN TO REPLY
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
Joined Jun 2012
1,260 posts
Kalispell Montana
[MORE/SHARE]

Voaky999 wrote in post #15035496external link
Just back from Italy, you will need something wide wide wide. Narrow streets etc. give lots of opportunity for great shots. Get a 10-22.

Do u think that the 10-22 would be fast enough? all shots will be hand held i just want too make sure i can get the shots without having to pump the iso up too high.

Post #8, Sep 24, 2012 10:26:40


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Voaky999
Goldmember
Voaky999's Avatar
Joined Nov 2010
2,545 posts
Edmonton,AB
[MORE/SHARE]

mine1 wrote in post #15035503external link
Do u think that the 10-22 would be fast enough? all shots will be hand held i just want too make sure i can get the shots without having to pump the iso up too high.

I have used the 10-22 extensively, and yes it should be quite usuable. Your 60D is for good up to ISO1600 which is more than enough in most situations. You can also bring a tripod for those low light or night scenes.

Post #9, Sep 24, 2012 10:30:38


Don
I want a seat where I can see the hands of the pianist

LOG IN TO REPLY
lehmanncpa
Goldmember
lehmanncpa's Avatar
Joined Aug 2012
1,943 posts
Raleigh, NC
[MORE/SHARE]

10-22mm will be awesome for Italy. You'll probably use that more than 75% of the time. Normal zoom lens (15-85 or 18-135) for portraits and candids of interesting folks around Trevi fountain in Rome. The Spanish Steps with a wide angle is awesome.

Also, get yourself a small camera bean bag that can easily be stuffed in your pocket. Some places do not allow flash photography or tripods. Place the camera on the bean bag on the floor of the church/museum and take longer exposures. A cool trick is to place your camera on the floor of a cathedral face up and take long exposures of the ceilings. Don't forget to use the timer function or remote control for shutter release.

Have a great trip! I love Italy!

Post #10, Sep 24, 2012 10:39:33 as a reply to mine1's post 12 minutes earlier.


Alex
Gear List
Feedback
Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lbsimon
Goldmember
Lbsimon's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
1,534 posts
Boston, MA
[MORE/SHARE]

Agree with most of the postings - wide, wide, wide. I use the Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 (almost half the price of Canon 10-22), and I don't care that it is fairly slow. Most of my outdoor shots are at broad daylight. Besides, the wide lens is used for streets and buildings, and they do not move too fast. :-) The same can be said about your 18-135. You will use it a lot, there is no need to go longer. The buildings are big, the streets narrow. Even a 15mm is not good enough for inside of the Colosseum.

I also take a fast prime for indoors of the cathedrals. For that I have a Sigma 30mm f/1.4 which is great for that purpose. As a result, I have a 60D with usually a 17-70 attached, and two more lenses in a Tamrac bag. Well, now my wife got into photography too, so I have a backpack for two bodies and four lenses. Guess who carries the backpack when we are done with shooting? :-)

There is one thing to keep in mind. Once I was in Rome and Florence in winter, at Christmas. It is a great time to be there - festive moods, a lot of people on the streets (mostly locals), but it gets dark early. Try to get up and out early, to get as much daytime as possible.

Post #11, Sep 24, 2012 17:03:24


6D | 70D | T2i | S110 | EF 24-105L | EF-S 15-85 IS | EF 70-200L F4 IS | Sigma 10-20 | Sigma 30 1.4 | EF-S 60 2.8 | EF-S 18-200 IS | Sigma 120-400 | Canon 1.4x II | Nissin Di622 M2 | Nissin Di422

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
Joined Jun 2012
1,260 posts
Kalispell Montana
[MORE/SHARE]

thanks all good suggestions. I am thinking I might want to at least get a mono pod to take and that should solve any problems I have by it being too dark I have pretty steady hands. I was really hoping that the 15-85 would be wide enough so I could get away with just the one lens but having the reach of the 135 will help with getting shots of some of the sculptures that are on top of buildings and such. Do any of you know how much of a deposit places like lens rental.com charges.

Post #12, Sep 24, 2012 17:31:21 as a reply to Lbsimon's post 27 minutes earlier.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
Joined Jun 2012
1,260 posts
Kalispell Montana
[MORE/SHARE]

OK so I have decided on the UWA and the 18-135. Do any of you think it the F2.8 that comes with the 11-16 II (hoping the new version cures the flare problems I read the first one had) is worth losing the 10mm and 17-22mm from the canon one? Remember it is winter so should be cloudy most of the time and I also want to be able to get pictures in churches and museums.

Post #13, Sep 25, 2012 16:43:46 as a reply to mine1's post 23 hours earlier.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
lehmanncpa
Goldmember
lehmanncpa's Avatar
Joined Aug 2012
1,943 posts
Raleigh, NC
[MORE/SHARE]

You'll be very happy with the 11-16mm f/2.8. You'll capture some great moments with it.

Post #14, Sep 25, 2012 17:03:13 as a reply to mine1's post 19 minutes earlier.


Alex
Gear List
Feedback
Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
Joined Jun 2012
1,260 posts
Kalispell Montana
[MORE/SHARE]

Yah I was leaning towards the 11-16mm I figure it is better to be safe than sorry with the Fstop.

Post #15, Sep 25, 2012 22:05:13 as a reply to lehmanncpa's post 5 hours earlier.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
8,908 views & 0 likes for this thread
Lens For Italy
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Urban Life & Travel Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00178 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1058 guests, 830 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is eddyjs62

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.