Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Urban Life & Travel Talk
Thread started 24 Sep 2012 (Monday) 00:12
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Lens For Italy

 
mine1
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
1,288 posts
Joined Jun 2012
Kalispell Montana
Sep 24, 2012 00:12 |  #1

I am going to Italy in January and will be in Rome, Florence, and Venice. So my question is this, I have a 60d and the kit 18-135, which is plenty long I think but I don't think it will be wide enough or fast enough for inside and cloudy Italy in January. I was wondering if anyone had any opinion if taking just a 15-85 would be wide enough for me so I could just take one lens. Or should I go with a 11-16 2.8 (figure the 2.8 is better for the weather and indoors that I am planing on than the more flare resistant cannon 10-22), and my 18-135. I would like to just take the one lens (15-85) but just not sure if it would be fast enough or wide enough for getting the good shots inside, and if it is really overcast. Any advice would be welcomed.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
colintf
Senior Member
287 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Bristol, UK
Sep 24, 2012 06:11 |  #2

another thing to bear in mind is distortion, unless you post procress each photo.
I find the 17-55f2.8 meets most of my needs for this kind of trip




LOG IN TO REPLY
Apricane
Senior Member
Apricane's Avatar
819 posts
Joined Nov 2011
Canada's Federal Capital
Sep 24, 2012 06:41 |  #3

Looking at my very, very, old P&S pics of St. Peter's, I'd say that 15mm, 17mm, or 18mm on a crop should be sufficient on the wide end for your needs, at least for indoors (my widest pics at that time were at the 35mm equivalent of 34mm). As for aperture, it seems 2.7 wasn't enough for flash-less photography, although back then (six years ago, so it might have changed) it seems flash was allowed both in St. Peter's and in the Pantheon.

Looking at my pics from outside, I'd definitely wish to have at least a 15mm wide lens if I went back.


Apricane 500px (external link) flickr (external link) | 6D | 70D | T2i | 430EX II & 270EX II
15-85 | ∑24-105A | 55-250 STM | 70-300L
24 STM | 35 f/2 IS | 40 STM | 60 Macro | 100L

LOG IN TO REPLY
artyH
Goldmember
2,033 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Sep 24, 2012 09:21 |  #4

There are a few places in Rome where 18 isn't wide enough - the Coliseum, Pantheon and Diocletian Baths come to mind. The 18-135 will be wide enough for just about everything else. The 15-85 may do it, but I am not sure about this. On my next trip to Italy, I plan to take my Tokina 12-24F4.
You can bump up ISO, so I wouldn't worry about the lighting in most cases if you use a lens with IS.
There were some places where you might need a faster lens, but f2.8 wouldn't be enough then. Consider a fast, shorter prime.
For me, wide was more important in Italy than long. The streets are narrow and the buildings are large.




LOG IN TO REPLY
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
1,288 posts
Joined Jun 2012
Kalispell Montana
Sep 24, 2012 10:22 as a reply to artyH's post |  #5

yah I wanted at the minimum 15mm. but had not thought about the fact that without is that 11-16 might actually be slower than the 15-85 at 15mm (which is where I figure most of my pictures would be at.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
1,288 posts
Joined Jun 2012
Kalispell Montana
Sep 24, 2012 10:25 as a reply to mine1's post |  #6

and as far as a prime goes I don't' think there are any ones wide enough. I don't have any interest in shooting people so no need to zoom in on there face. but if there is like a 15mm or less fast prime I might consider that because I plan on most of my shots to be at what ever the widest setting I have is.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Voaky999
Goldmember
Voaky999's Avatar
Joined Nov 2010
Edmonton,AB
Sep 24, 2012 10:25 |  #7

Just back from Italy, you will need something wide wide wide. Narrow streets etc. give lots of opportunity for great shots. Get a 10-22.


Don
I drink and I know things

LOG IN TO REPLY
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
1,288 posts
Joined Jun 2012
Kalispell Montana
Sep 24, 2012 10:26 |  #8

Voaky999 wrote in post #15035496external link
Just back from Italy, you will need something wide wide wide. Narrow streets etc. give lots of opportunity for great shots. Get a 10-22.

Do u think that the 10-22 would be fast enough? all shots will be hand held i just want too make sure i can get the shots without having to pump the iso up too high.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Voaky999
Goldmember
Voaky999's Avatar
Joined Nov 2010
Edmonton,AB
Sep 24, 2012 10:30 |  #9

mine1 wrote in post #15035503external link
Do u think that the 10-22 would be fast enough? all shots will be hand held i just want too make sure i can get the shots without having to pump the iso up too high.

I have used the 10-22 extensively, and yes it should be quite usuable. Your 60D is for good up to ISO1600 which is more than enough in most situations. You can also bring a tripod for those low light or night scenes.


Don
I drink and I know things

LOG IN TO REPLY
lehmanncpa
Goldmember
lehmanncpa's Avatar
1,943 posts
Joined Aug 2012
Raleigh, NC
Sep 24, 2012 10:39 as a reply to mine1's post |  #10

10-22mm will be awesome for Italy. You'll probably use that more than 75% of the time. Normal zoom lens (15-85 or 18-135) for portraits and candids of interesting folks around Trevi fountain in Rome. The Spanish Steps with a wide angle is awesome.

Also, get yourself a small camera bean bag that can easily be stuffed in your pocket. Some places do not allow flash photography or tripods. Place the camera on the bean bag on the floor of the church/museum and take longer exposures. A cool trick is to place your camera on the floor of a cathedral face up and take long exposures of the ceilings. Don't forget to use the timer function or remote control for shutter release.

Have a great trip! I love Italy!


Alex
Gear List
Feedback
Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lbsimon
Goldmember
Lbsimon's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Boston, MA
Sep 24, 2012 17:03 |  #11

Agree with most of the postings - wide, wide, wide. I use the Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 (almost half the price of Canon 10-22), and I don't care that it is fairly slow. Most of my outdoor shots are at broad daylight. Besides, the wide lens is used for streets and buildings, and they do not move too fast. :-) The same can be said about your 18-135. You will use it a lot, there is no need to go longer. The buildings are big, the streets narrow. Even a 15mm is not good enough for inside of the Colosseum.

I also take a fast prime for indoors of the cathedrals. For that I have a Sigma 30mm f/1.4 which is great for that purpose. As a result, I have a 60D with usually a 17-70 attached, and two more lenses in a Tamrac bag. Well, now my wife got into photography too, so I have a backpack for two bodies and four lenses. Guess who carries the backpack when we are done with shooting? :-)

There is one thing to keep in mind. Once I was in Rome and Florence in winter, at Christmas. It is a great time to be there - festive moods, a lot of people on the streets (mostly locals), but it gets dark early. Try to get up and out early, to get as much daytime as possible.


6D | 7D Mk II | 70D | S110 | EF 17-40L | EF 24-105L | EF 70-200L F4 IS | EF 100-400L II | EF-S 18-200 | EF 85 1.8 | Canon 1.4x III | Canon 1.4x II | Kenko 1.4x | Nissin Di622 M2 | Nissin Di422

LOG IN TO REPLY
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
1,288 posts
Joined Jun 2012
Kalispell Montana
Sep 24, 2012 17:31 as a reply to Lbsimon's post |  #12

thanks all good suggestions. I am thinking I might want to at least get a mono pod to take and that should solve any problems I have by it being too dark I have pretty steady hands. I was really hoping that the 15-85 would be wide enough so I could get away with just the one lens but having the reach of the 135 will help with getting shots of some of the sculptures that are on top of buildings and such. Do any of you know how much of a deposit places like lens rental.com charges.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
1,288 posts
Joined Jun 2012
Kalispell Montana
Sep 25, 2012 16:43 as a reply to mine1's post |  #13

OK so I have decided on the UWA and the 18-135. Do any of you think it the F2.8 that comes with the 11-16 II (hoping the new version cures the flare problems I read the first one had) is worth losing the 10mm and 17-22mm from the canon one? Remember it is winter so should be cloudy most of the time and I also want to be able to get pictures in churches and museums.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
lehmanncpa
Goldmember
lehmanncpa's Avatar
1,943 posts
Joined Aug 2012
Raleigh, NC
Sep 25, 2012 17:03 as a reply to mine1's post |  #14

You'll be very happy with the 11-16mm f/2.8. You'll capture some great moments with it.


Alex
Gear List
Feedback
Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mine1
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mine1's Avatar
1,288 posts
Joined Jun 2012
Kalispell Montana
Sep 25, 2012 22:05 as a reply to lehmanncpa's post |  #15

Yah I was leaning towards the 11-16mm I figure it is better to be safe than sorry with the Fstop.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/81190407@N08/external link
Canon 60d.Canon 18-135, 55-250 II, and 10-18 stm. and Benro C-1681t Travel Angel, with Sirui K20x head.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

11,695 views & 0 likes for this thread
Lens For Italy
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Urban Life & Travel Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00135 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Hjerkfelt
1038 guests, 613 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016