LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


85 1.8 vs 100 2.8 IS for portrait

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 02 Oct 2012 (Tuesday) 14:18   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
vaflower
Senior Member
vaflower's Avatar
Joined Sep 2012
855 posts
Massachusetts
[MORE/SHARE]

What's better for portrait ? Thanks. I want opinion and examples of someone who already used both (not the general 100 is macro so it is not as good as 85 1.8 etc. )

Thanks

Post #1, Oct 02, 2012 14:18:31


Fuji XE-1, Zeiss ikon, Hasselblad; I love shooting film as a conceptual idea :)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
The ­ Warlock
Senior Member
The Warlock's Avatar
Joined May 2011
505 posts
Stavanger, Norway
[MORE/SHARE]

With the 100L

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7226/7357069878_d67d4fa78d_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com ...s/the_warlock/73570​69878/]external link Taking a early intrestexternal link by VassøyPhotoClub-Vidarexternal link, on Flickr"]
(DUPLICATE IMAGE)
external link Taking a early intrestexternal link by VassøyPhotoClub-Vidar, on Flickrexternal link

IMAGE: http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6008/5982553023_9a944bca44_b.jpg
[IMAGE'S LINK: http://www.flickr.com ...s/the_warlock/59825​53023/]external link My wifeexternal link by VassøyPhotoClub-Vidarexternal link, on Flickr"]
(DUPLICATE IMAGE)
external link My wifeexternal link by VassøyPhotoClub-Vidar, on Flickrexternal link

With the 85mm 1.8
[URL=http://[URL]www.f​lickr.com/photos/the_w​arlock/7797161368/]
IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8448/7797161368_b5de1987c2_b.jpg
[URL=http://[URL]www.f​lickr.com/photos/the_w​arlock/7797161368/]My wife at Gibraltar by VassøyPhotoClub-Vidarexternal link, on Flickr"][URL=http://[U​RL]www.flickr.com/phot​os/the_warlock/7797161​368/]
(DUPLICATE IMAGE)
[URL=http://[URL]www.f​lickr.com/photos/the_w​arlock/7797161368/]My wife at Gibraltar by VassøyPhotoClub-Vidar, on Flickrexternal link

I really like both for portraits, the 100L is abit on the long side, great for headshots and a very good IS. Love the bokeh on both. Wide open the 85mm 1.8 is very CA prone, i havent seen it on the 100L. The 100L is used for portraits and macro both by me, the 85mm 1.8 is used for sports and portraits. The 100L focuses slower than the 85mm which is blindingly fast. I think there is room for both, the 85mm isnt very expensive, atleast compared to how good it is. Since you are on FF, they both will easier for portraits,FL wise. The 100L is the sharpest lens ive got, from 2.8 and out, brilliant. If i could keep only one, i'll take the 100L.

Post #2, Oct 02, 2012 14:58:22


Canon 60D, Canon 1100D , 17-40 4L , 24mm 1.4L II,Zeiss Distagon T*2/35 ZE,50mm 1.2L, 85mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 IS L, 50mm 1.8II, 18-55 III, 430 exII,TT Retrospective 20, Lightroom 4.
Set a pen to a dream, and the colour drains from it.
R.H. Barlow and H.P. Lovecraft
"The Night Ocean"

LOG IN TO REPLY
pdrober2
Goldmember
pdrober2's Avatar
Joined Nov 2010
2,309 posts
Durham, NC
[MORE/SHARE]

the 100L i had was by far the sharpest glass i have ever used. IS helps if you are shooting handheld, and the AF was alright. The FL should be just fine on FF.

Post #3, Oct 02, 2012 19:10:40


Fujifilm X-T1 | 12 | 23 | 27 | 56 | 90 | 55-200
Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
nightcat
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2008
4,441 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I have the 100mm 2.8 macro L and the 100mm f2. The 100mm macro is a good portrait lens. The 100mm f2 is a GREAT portrait lens.

Post #4, Oct 02, 2012 19:13:31




LOG IN TO REPLY
vaflower
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
vaflower's Avatar
Joined Sep 2012
855 posts
Massachusetts
[MORE/SHARE]

Interesting. Thanks for the thought. What makes you think 100 f2 is better than 100 f2.8 macro ? I heard that 85 1.8 has very similar rendition and sharpness to 100 2.0.

To warlock: love your pics. I used to have 85 1.8 on cropped, took lovely pics but I found it quite limited to upper half body portrait. Now I use 5d mii, 85 1.8 will shine even more. Since I just hot a really good deal on 100 2.8 macro L, I am just wondering how are they going to compete with each other .

Post #5, Oct 02, 2012 21:29:49


Fuji XE-1, Zeiss ikon, Hasselblad; I love shooting film as a conceptual idea :)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
nightcat
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2008
4,441 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

The 100mm f2 just gives you the option of f2 when you require it for certain portraits. Comparing it to the 85mm 1.8, they are quite similar. I liked 3 things better about the 100mm f2 over the 85mm... less CA wide open, slightly smoother bokeh, and I found I liked the slightly longer focal length.

Post #6, Oct 02, 2012 21:50:20




LOG IN TO REPLY
Winginhunk
Senior Member
Winginhunk's Avatar
Joined Dec 2006
153 posts
Spanaway, WA. USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Here is one hand held with my 5Dc and the 100L IS

Canon EOS 5D, f/4 @ 100 mm, 1/15, ISO 800, No Flash

IMAGE: http://wingincamera.zenfolio.com/img/s9/v13/p34946879-5.jpg

Post #7, Oct 03, 2012 01:44:06 as a reply to nightcat's post 3 hours earlier.


http://wingincamera.ze​nfolio.com/external link
Canon 5Dc, Canon 70-200mm F4 L, 100mm F2.8L, 50mm F1.8, Sigma 24-70mm F2.8, Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6
Focus your eyes to where you want to be,
Not to where you are afraid of falling to....

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,329 views & 0 likes for this thread
85 1.8 vs 100 2.8 IS for portrait
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00072 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
826 guests, 780 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is rsnoeyink

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.