![]() |
|
|||||||
| sponsored links |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
So, I have a very different view of what I find very attractive in women. I would say that most of them would not fit in the "model" class...like you would find on OMP. Most of them have small busts, tiny waists, and almost no hips. I honestly believe I could do a good job with them...esp with fashion shoots. But, I also would like to try my hand at these kinds of women when it comes to lingerie and possibly some nudes.
My question is this. Should I even try with these types of women? Or should I focus on larger busts and larger hips? Would one necessarily look better than the other in a glamour photographer's portfolio. Thanks in advance FlipsidE
__________________
FlipsidE |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 820
|
Seems to me that the typical runway model is usually built about the way you've described. If you aren't going for the Playboy side of things, you may be on to something. I've always figured if I did any model photography, I think I'd rather find some less glamourous models - you know, girl next door types. They can look pretty sexy in their own right. I'm picturing Mary Ann from Gilligan's Island here....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
|
I think your best bet to work with many different types of models and not just focus on a particular type. I really learned a lot about how I work when I would photograph some women that I did not have a real attraction too. It was up to me to figure out how to make them look good, and I did
__________________
lanceshuey.com flickr "Like a mechanic who forgets to wipe his hands on a shop rag and then goes home, hugs his wife, and gets a grease stain on her favorite sweater — love touches you, and marks you forever." |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
obsolete as of this post
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
Posts: 3,903
|
I think you haven't been looking at OMP long enough if you think there is a typical model on OMP
I do think that you should start with whatever you like to shoot and then add some challenges and then go to what other's want. If building a portfolio for a glamour studio then having a variety is what you really want so that any woman will want to pose for you because no matter what they look like you will make them beautiful. I know that is my goal.
__________________
"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired" www.longwatcher.com 1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L http://www.longwatcher.com/photoequipment.htm |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How did you become a pro (or semi-pro)? | Aylwin | The Business of Photography | 33 | 11th of April 2009 (Sat) 15:40 |
| Pre Semi-Pro Question... | turbo212003 | The Business of Photography | 5 | 15th of February 2007 (Thu) 13:11 |
| How many pro or semi-pro (you get paid) wedding photographer | MRCPhoto | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 11 | 1st of July 2004 (Thu) 07:25 |
| How many pro or semi-pro (you get paid) wedding photographer | MRCPhoto | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 0 | 30th of June 2004 (Wed) 11:39 |