Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events
Thread started 02 Jan 2006 (Monday) 13:08
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

balance during a wedding; a realistic approach?

 
rightaway
Member
rightaway's Avatar
155 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Jan 02, 2006 13:08 |  #1

Hi,

How do you guys and gals handle white balance when shooting weddings?
I find that it can be quite difficut to handle that problem as the lighting can vary quite a bit within the same location! :confused:

The lighting can be very different from the back of the church than the front. There seem to be more churches than before with skylights. Depending where the couple is at certain moments during the wedding, the white balance might have to be redone. Even a changing sky condition will have an effect...

I'd rather nail the white balance on the spot than having to fix RAW files after the fact.

Any realistic suggestions on white balance tools?

thanks




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,842 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Jan 02, 2006 15:34 |  #2

I wouldn't have time to fiddle with white cards during a wedding. I shoot auto 99% the time, shoot RAW so you can fiddle with it later. Make sure you have a calibrated monitor. I change to presets (tungsten, cloudy, etc) only occasionally.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Wazza
Cream of the Crop
Wazza's Avatar
10,627 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Queenstown, New Zealand
Jan 02, 2006 15:36 as a reply to tim's post |  #3

Like tim, I also use auto probably 99% of the time. The 20D rarely goes wrong, and by shooting RAW, it's extremely easy to move the slider in RawShooter Essentials, and get the correct balance. I never could figure out how to do a JPG image in photoshop though. I'm lacking the skills. Raw is a lifesaver sometimes. Always use it. :)


New Zealand Photography Tours (external link) | Williams Photography - Queenstown Wedding Photography (external link) |
Instagram (external link) | Facebook - Weddings (external link) | Facebook - Landscapes + Tours (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,842 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Jan 02, 2006 15:38 |  #4

Wazza, I use the color ballance sliders in JPG, though since I shoot RAW I don't need to.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
rightaway
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
rightaway's Avatar
155 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Jan 02, 2006 15:44 as a reply to tim's post |  #5

How long does the 20D take to record the RAW file to memory?
Shooting high Jpeg has the advantage of saving the shots faster to the memory.

Tim, what do you use to calibrate your monitor?

thanks

Stephan




LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,842 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Jan 02, 2006 15:47 as a reply to rightaway's post |  #6

rightaway wrote:
How long does the 20D take to record the RAW file to memory?
Shooting high Jpeg has the advantage of saving the shots faster to the memory.

In practice this isn't an issue. The 20D has a buffer of 6 shots, and it empties quickly. Unless you tend to hold your finger on the shutter for 2+ seconds RAW is easily fast enough, and if you do that i'd have to wonder why.

rightaway wrote:
Tim, what do you use to calibrate your monitor?

Optrix XR, which I got from B&H. I have an LCD, it calibrates LCD or CRT.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
rightaway
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
rightaway's Avatar
155 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Jan 02, 2006 19:27 as a reply to tim's post |  #7

Tim,

That system is over $1K... I can't afford that :(
What about the spyder system from color vision?

thanks




LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,842 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Jan 02, 2006 19:42 |  #8

This oneexternal link is the one i'm talking about, $219.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
rightaway
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
rightaway's Avatar
155 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Jan 02, 2006 21:28 as a reply to tim's post |  #9

I see!!!

Optix and not Optrix!!! ;)

Any advantage over the spyder?




LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,842 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Jan 02, 2006 21:30 |  #10

Ah I was close! Check out the comparison article somewhere on smartshooter.com, it compares them and this one comes out better somehow. I think Pekka has the Spyder and likes it.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
rightaway
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
rightaway's Avatar
155 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Jan 03, 2006 17:03 as a reply to tim's post |  #11

Tim,

That "r" nearly cost me $1000!!!! :D and you said you were close!!! lol




LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,842 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Jan 04, 2006 02:23 |  #12

Heh, the advice is worth what you paid for it :p


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
jeffarmstrong
Hatchling
jeffarmstrong's Avatar
1 post
Joined Jan 2017
Louisville, United States
Jan 11, 2017 23:41 |  #13

My wife and I are currently trying to figure this one out to save post-processing time. She wants me to use kelvin, but I'm not the best at it (and don't really feel like messing with it). Another thing we're planning on doing more of is starting to use gels on our flash to help balance WB.

Currently, the main thing I've been doing is using auto WB. However, once I started using the specific settings such as "shade" when in those conditions, I notice the WB was much better and more consistent, so this is something I'm wanting to improve on for our wedding photos. My wife does most of the editing, so making things easier on the post-processing side would fall in the category of "happy wife=happy life" :-)


Louisville Wedding Photographer | Kentucky Wedding Photographer | Elopement Photographer
https://jeffandmichele​photo.com ...lle-wedding-photographers (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
evolyllaphotography
Member
evolyllaphotography's Avatar
Joined Dec 2016
Toronto
Jan 12, 2017 08:25 |  #14

Shoot in raw and auto white balance.


Toronto Documentary Wedding Photographer | Evolylla Photography (external link)
follow me on Instagram (external link); follow me on Facebook (external link); Canon shooter

LOG IN TO REPLY
BlackBull
Senior Member
BlackBull's Avatar
Joined Sep 2012
Lancashire
Jan 13, 2017 06:02 |  #15

I shoot with a 5DIII and find that the Auto WB is pretty damn good. Sometimes it'll need tweaking a little in LR but only a little.

I'll only set my WB on a fixed setting if I'm shooting outdoors where the light is very consistent but even then Auto WB does a very good job.


Lancashire Wedding Photographer ǀ Rob Georgeson Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

7,000 views & 9 likes for this thread
balance during a wedding; a realistic approach?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Weddings & Other Family Events


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00128 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is ozhaggis
805 guests, 298 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016