Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 09 Mar 2013 (Saturday) 08:18
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Still can't get over it 6D autofocus 11 points

 
sega62
Senior Member
sega62's Avatar
755 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Mar 09, 2013 08:18 |  #1

After reading so many reviews and infos about the Canon 6D, I'm still wondering
who came with this huge mistake, not having a great autofocus on a $2000 camera.

Sure it has GPS, WiFi......got a full frame camera at a neat price, but what
does it give you to have all this mojo without a good autofocus, or should I say a fast and great autofocus.

We all know that the autofocus is a MUST for high end camera, and yet Canon produce
something similar as the 5dmkII that was made 4 years ago.
Its not that its bad, its got competition, its technology that Canon has already, so why not use it.

In my book, they really did not respect the customer, I'd rather have no GPS and get a proper autofocus!

gee......




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
GoodEye906
Member
238 posts
Joined Dec 2012
Mar 09, 2013 08:23 |  #2

That's cool, bro. Don't like it, don't buy it.


- Joe
1D IV | 5D III | 16-35 f/2.8 L II | 24-70 f/2.8 L II | 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II | 50 f/1.2 L | 85 f/1.2 L II | 100 f/2.8 L | 135 f/2 L | 1.4x Extender III | 2x Extender III | 430EX II | 600EX-RT | (2x) AB800's | PW MiniTT1 | PW FlexTT5 | PW AC3 | PW AC9

LOG IN TO REPLY
sega62
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
sega62's Avatar
755 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Mar 09, 2013 08:28 |  #3

GoodEye906 wrote in post #15694756external link
That's cool, bro. Don't like it, don't buy it.

Yep, you got my drift....




LOG IN TO REPLY
BobbyT
Goldmember
BobbyT's Avatar
1,202 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Mar 09, 2013 08:28 |  #4

They're not going to give the 6D features which will cut into the sales of the 5D3.


Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
GoodEye906
Member
238 posts
Joined Dec 2012
Mar 09, 2013 08:29 |  #5

BobbyT wrote in post #15694770external link
They're not going to give the 6D features which will cut into the sales of the 5D3.

^ this.


- Joe
1D IV | 5D III | 16-35 f/2.8 L II | 24-70 f/2.8 L II | 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II | 50 f/1.2 L | 85 f/1.2 L II | 100 f/2.8 L | 135 f/2 L | 1.4x Extender III | 2x Extender III | 430EX II | 600EX-RT | (2x) AB800's | PW MiniTT1 | PW FlexTT5 | PW AC3 | PW AC9

LOG IN TO REPLY
sega62
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
sega62's Avatar
755 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Mar 09, 2013 08:33 |  #6

BobbyT wrote in post #15694770external link
They're not going to give the 6D features which will cut into the sales of the 5D3.

Sure, BUT other cie did that without a problem.


My main point is

Why not give people what they need, without taking all their money.
Maybe a $150 more would have been a great thing.
Like I said, GPS, is not really my cup of tea, BUT fast autofocus I could use a lot more often.

I'm not trashing, I'm more in a wonder mode, why.........
In a near future, i'm sure they will regret that decision....




LOG IN TO REPLY
ScullenCrossBones
Senior Member
ScullenCrossBones's Avatar
842 posts
Joined May 2009
Keller, TX
Mar 09, 2013 08:33 |  #7

Get over it.


:p Gear
Mama done took my Kodachrome away...

LOG IN TO REPLY
sega62
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
sega62's Avatar
755 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Mar 09, 2013 08:38 |  #8

ScullenCrossBones wrote in post #15694782external link
Get over it.

I'm calm down already, beer helps :O)




LOG IN TO REPLY
jaomul
Goldmember
jaomul's Avatar
Joined Apr 2011
Cork, Ireland
Mar 09, 2013 08:44 |  #9

By all accounts the af in some ways is better than the 5d3, but....


flickr (external link)
Olympus EM5,Nikon d7200,
Olympus 12-50mm, 40-150mm,17mm f2.8,Nikon 50mm F1.8, Tamron 90mm vc, 18-105mmVR, Sigma 18-35 f1.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
They have pills for that now you know.
gjl711's Avatar
53,513 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Deep in the heart of Texas
Mar 09, 2013 08:46 |  #10

sega62 wrote in post #15694746external link
We all know that the autofocus is a MUST for high end camera, and yet Canon produce
something similar as the 5dmkII that was made 4 years ago.
Its not that its bad, its got competition, its technology that Canon has already, so why not use it.......

It was a huge mistake in the MkII and it took Canon over 3 years to fix their mistake. In the 6D though it's appropriate as its their low end full frame camera. I don't see what your complaining about. Want great AF, shell out 3k for the MkIII. Want to spend less, shell out 2k for the 6D. Want to spend even less and get 90% of what the other two have, pick up the MkII. It still holds it own against both Canon's full frame entries especially in the IQ department.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

LOG IN TO REPLY
sega62
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
sega62's Avatar
755 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Mar 09, 2013 08:56 |  #11

gjl711 wrote in post #15694798external link
. Want great AF, shell out 3k for the MkIII. Want to spend less, shell out 2k for the 6D. Want to spend even less and get 90% of what the other two have, pick up the MkII. It still holds it own against both Canon's full frame entries especially in the IQ department.

About the 90% i'm not sure you got the equation right.
I'd go further as saying it's maybe 50% the amount of picture quality when having
a person or something going slightly fast towards you.....or a bird, or ......

Then again, why not just have the technology and applying it to every camera,the 7D
has it.......why not the 6D????

I could buy another brand camera, and get a great lens for the price of the 5D mkIII (you know what I mean) but i'm not there yet! I don't mind having two different camera.

That way I could tell Canon, that i'm not happy bout the autofocus.....

The whole thing is not cool at all.

I'm too picky?




LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Nick5's Avatar
2,921 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Philadelphia Suburbs
Mar 09, 2013 09:01 |  #12

The 6D was built down to a price point, similar to the 60D.
Build quality, focal points, are all features that are sacrificed when downgrading.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 24-105 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon Pixma PRO-10 Printer

LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
2,257 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Mar 09, 2013 09:08 |  #13

sega62 wrote in post #15694746external link
After reading so many reviews and infos about the Canon 6D, I'm still wondering
who came with this huge mistake, not having a great autofocus on a $2000 camera.

If the 6D had autofocus as good as the 5D3 in terms of outer points and AIServo, a lot less 5D3s would sell.

That's the unfortunate tragedy of marketing concerns.

For a person who only uses center-point in OVF mode, though, the 6D's AF is state-of-the-art. It is so much better than the 5D2's AF. My 6D focuses well at f/8 when tricked, and focuses in a closet in a room with only weak bounced light from the window. The first week I had the 6D, I walked into Central Park in NYC at night and tried the AF on unlit tree branches against the sky, and it focused accurately on the branches.

I'm sure that Canon is hoping that there are people with money to burn, who buy both the 6D and the 5D3, to get the best of both, when needed.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sega62
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
sega62's Avatar
755 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Mar 09, 2013 09:09 |  #14

Nick5 wrote in post #15694835external link
The 6D was built down to a price point, similar to the 60D.
Build quality, focal points, are all features that are sacrificed when downgrading.

Yeah, I understand that, and am well aware, but c'mon....i'm not talking big megapixel,,
not talking bout all the mojo the 5d3 has,not talking bout dynamic range, i'm talking bout auto-focus.

Its like having a video game console, and not having the cpu to drive the video card.
Whats the need???




LOG IN TO REPLY
Bakewell
Goldmember
1,385 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Irvine, CA
Mar 09, 2013 09:14 |  #15
banned

sega62 wrote in post #15694822external link
That way I could tell Canon, that i'm not happy bout the autofocus.....

The whole thing is not cool at all.

I'm too picky?

Yes..there is nothing wrong with the AF.


Dave

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

43,393 views & 0 likes for this thread
Still can't get over it 6D autofocus 11 points
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00146 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is mike4111
909 guests, 498 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017