Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Equipment Talk' section > Canon EF and EF-S Lenses > Lens Sample Photo Archive
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #1
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
 
cdifoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 34,015
Default Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 DG - Bigma

I don't know if this topic is particularly useful, but for some reason it seemed like a good idea at the time I thought of doing it. I'm showing 2 images of pretty much the same scene. Not on a tripod so I may have gotten a little lopsided with one or the other. I did take them consecutively and in the same spot however. One is wide open (f/6.3) @ 500mm (first one), and wide open (f/4) @ 50mm (second one). My in camera contrast is set to 0 on the Rebel XT, as is my sharpness. As a result, both images were resized as shown and 65%, 1, 1 USM was applied & I also used auto-contrast in Photoshop 7.0. It doesn't show raw sharpness of the lens, but it does display what it can do wide open, handheld and *cleaned up*. It also shows the difference between 50mm and 500mm for those wondering what 500mm (actual 465mm I've heard) would get them as far as reach is concerned.





I hope this thread helps at least someone.
__________________
Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!

Last edited by cdifoto : 14th of January 2006 (Sat) at 10:55.
cdifoto is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #2
GS Rider
Member
 
GS Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 242
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

thanks for that - it gives a 'real world' feel for the reach of the lens.
__________________
www.monkeypix.co.uk

Canon 5D
Canon 20D
17-85MM IS USM
Canon 50MM F1.4 USM
70-200MM f4L
100-400 f4.5-5.6 L USM IS
SIGMA 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG MACRO
Speedlite 580EX
Slik Pro 700
Lowepro Dryzone 200
Sony HDR-HC1
Pentax WPi
GS Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #3
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
 
condyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 20,839
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

Nice one ...imagine that vehicle was a bird and we can now appreciate what length contributes. Of course, if it was a bird we'd all **** ourselves and run

BTW, not sure about this new rumour about 500mm not being 500mm! I certainly found the extra on the Bigma I had was missed when using the 100-400 IS L in the field. Whatever the case, - or + a few mm's, you do notice when it's not there.
__________________

condyk is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #4
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
 
cdifoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 34,015
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

Quote:
Originally Posted by condyk
Nice one ...imagine that vehicle was a bird and we can now appreciate what length contributes. Of course, if it was a bird we'd all **** ourselves and run

BTW, not sure about this new rumour about 500mm not being 500mm! I certainly found the extra on the Bigma I had was missed when using the 100-400 IS L in the field. Whatever the case, - or + a few mm's, you do notice when it's not there.
That gave me an idea. I went outside and did a *proper* reshoot...MLU, tripod, remote, etc. Wide open aperture, auto contrast, USM same as above. This is more of a focal length demo than anything...showing 400mm versus 500mm.

50mm:


400mm:


500mm:
__________________
Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!
cdifoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #5
tommykjensen
The Admin Dane
"Nobody is safe!"
 
tommykjensen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
Posts: 20,888
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

I haven't really considered the Bigma even though I do want a longer lens than my 300 f/4L IS.

But if I were considering buying this instead of the 400 f/5.6L to get more reach I would not choose the Bigma. I don't think the extra length between 400 and 500 is enough. There is nothing wrong with the quality though.
tommykjensen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #6
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
 
condyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 20,839
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

Good job ... now if you were a wildlife shooter primarily, like me, then this would be significant some of the time. You can manage great with the 400mm and 420mm/Tcon'd combo's most of the time tho'. What's very clear from this contribution too is that the 50mm 1.8 isn't going to be a good wildlife lens much of the time
__________________


Last edited by condyk : 14th of January 2006 (Sat) at 12:20.
condyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #7
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
 
cdifoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 34,015
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tommykjensen
I haven't really considered the Bigma even though I do want a longer lens than my 300 f/4L IS.

But if I were considering buying this instead of the 400 f/5.6L to get more reach I would not choose the Bigma. I don't think the extra length between 400 and 500 is enough. There is nothing wrong with the quality though.
A prime almost always trumps a zoom, especially with an extra stop of speed...I agree with you wholeheartedly. However, I do believe it's an excellent contender with the 100-400L...

I'm not a fan of primes though...but I will make exceptions when I need to. Because of that and the extra 100mm, which I consider significant, I would choose Bigma. If I needed something really long and really fast, I'd shell out the cash for a 500 f/4 or something.
__________________
Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!

Last edited by cdifoto : 14th of January 2006 (Sat) at 12:07.
cdifoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #8
tommykjensen
The Admin Dane
"Nobody is safe!"
 
tommykjensen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
Posts: 20,888
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdi-ink.com
A prime almost always trumps a zoom, especially with an extra stop of speed...I agree with you wholeheartedly. However, I do believe it's an excellent contender with the 100-400L...

I'm not a fan of primes though...but I will make exceptions when I need to.
I used the 400 prime as an example on purpose because if my choice was between the 100-400L and the Bigma I would choose the 100-400L for the IS. But then again I have tried the 100-400L before and do not like the push/pull zoom which is why I prefer the 400 prime.

My point was just that I don't think the extra 100 mm is very apparent and there for that extra length would not have any weight in my decision.

condyk is probably right that once You have had the 500 mm and go down You will notice it more.
tommykjensen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #9
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
 
cdifoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 34,015
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

Quote:
Originally Posted by tommykjensen
I used the 400 prime as an example on purpose because if my choice was between the 100-400L and the Bigma I would choose the 100-400L for the IS. But then again I have tried the 100-400L before and do not like the push/pull zoom which is why I prefer the 400 prime.

My point was just that I don't think the extra 100 mm is very apparent and there for that extra length would not have any weight in my decision.

condyk is probably right that once You have had the 500 mm and go down You will notice it more.
Yeah...it's like spot metering. I don't have it and therefore don't miss it. I'm sure if I had had it before, I wouldn't buy a new camera without it. Same with the XT and only one dial....I never owned a SLR (be it digital or film) before, so I don't miss the thumb dial...the shift button is fine for me.

As for the IS, the lens is heavy enough to balance itself out if you use decent technique (assuming you aren't shaky by nature)...in post #1, that 500mm shot was at 1/160th.
__________________
Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!

Last edited by cdifoto : 14th of January 2006 (Sat) at 12:18.
cdifoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #10
Calzinger
Senior Member
 
Calzinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,798
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

I'd hate to bother you, but would it be possible if you could take shots at more focal lengths? ie. 200mm VS 300mm for those in debate over the 70-300mm IS or the 70-200 f/4L, one of which is me.
Thanks!
__________________
"That building in the background is distracting."
"Oh OK, I'll move it out of the way next time."

internet forum fail
Calzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #11
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
 
cdifoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 34,015
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calzinger
I'd hate to bother you, but would it be possible if you could take shots at more focal lengths? ie. 200mm VS 300mm for those in debate over the 70-300mm IS or the 70-200 f/4L, one of which is me.
Thanks!
No problem. Keep in mind this is a different lens altogether, so focal length should be your only consideration. I got as close as I could to the focal lengths (noted accordingly).

50mm:


116mm:


191mm:


313mm:


417mm:


500mm:
__________________
Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!
cdifoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #12
Calzinger
Senior Member
 
Calzinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,798
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

Thanks! Greatly appreciated!
But now i'm really wondering if 200mm reach is enough, seems like the 300mm shot is much further out. Then again, I guess it does depend on how far the object your shooting is that affects your perception.
Thanks again!
__________________
"That building in the background is distracting."
"Oh OK, I'll move it out of the way next time."

internet forum fail
Calzinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #13
blue_max
Goldmember
 
blue_max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London UK
Posts: 2,622
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calzinger
Thanks! Greatly appreciated!
But now i'm really wondering if 200mm reach is enough, seems like the 300mm shot is much further out. Then again, I guess it does depend on how far the object your shooting is that affects your perception.
Thanks again!

That's exactly right. I used a 70-200 (at 200) and a 135mm prime and at short to medium distance, the difference was barely worth noticing. It was key to my selling my 70-200.

The pictures do seem very impressive though.

Graham
__________________
.
Lamb dressed as mutton.
blue_max is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #14
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
 
cdifoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 34,015
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

Quote:
Originally Posted by blue_max
That's exactly right. I used a 70-200 (at 200) and a 135mm prime and at short to medium distance, the difference was barely worth noticing. It was key to my selling my 70-200.

The pictures do seem very impressive though.

Graham
I actually bought my 70-200 f/2.8L AFTER Bigma...a long while after actually. I agree that it is ridiculously short, but I needed something with versatility and speed. It's an awesome lens for situations Bigma can't touch. I won't be selling either lens anytime soon. I will add longer stuff if I feel the need though....500 f/4 for example...but I don't foresee it anytime soon. I'm covered very nicely from 24mm-500mm, and hopefully before summer I'll add the Tokina 12-24 to go wide better than the kit lens does.
__________________
Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!
cdifoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th of January 2006 (Sat)   #15
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
Posts: 9,766
Default Re: For those interested in Bigma...

Looking at those shots you have a lot of scratches on your censor
looks to me like you have a great lens there those shots are very sharp and a good job of showing lenths.
Rob.
GyRob is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bigma Sigma 50-500mm for canon gangreen Classifieds: Buy 6 7th of November 2008 (Fri) 21:03
New BigMa - Sigma 50-500mm F4-6.3 EX DG/HSM tommykjensen Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 4 19th of May 2005 (Thu) 15:40


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.