Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Equipment Talk' section > Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5th of April 2013 (Fri)   #1
SmileThere
Member
 
SmileThere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The downstate of upstate New York
Posts: 85
Default Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

I currently have only the 100mm which I love, but is a bit too close for indoor/studio photography. I am debating between the 35 and 50. I am going to sell my 24-70, so price isn't the final decision maker here. Putting aside the price difference, which lens gives me better photos and better bokeh? I love me a creamy bokeh. Also, I wasn't even aware that there's a 40mm lens. How come that's rarely mentioned? How does it compare quality wise to the 50mm?

I should mention that I'd do more closeups rather than full body shots of adults. I've been told the 35 can distort a bit if you do closeups.

Thanks for your input.
__________________
~ Esther

I've got me a 5D, 100mm and looking to sell my 24-70 almost brand new lens.
SmileThere is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 5th of April 2013 (Fri)   #2
Nightdiver13
Goldmember
 
Nightdiver13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Around the Bend
Posts: 2,041
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

Why are you selling the 24-70? To me, that's one of the best indoor studio lenses and solves the problem of needing to purchase two separate primes for full-body and headshots/upperbody.
__________________
Neil, with an eye.

Last edited by Nightdiver13 : 5th of April 2013 (Fri) at 13:17.
Nightdiver13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th of April 2013 (Fri)   #3
Charlie
Cream of the Crop
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,557
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightdiver13 View Post
Why are you selling the 24-70? To me, that's of the best indoor studio lenses and solves the problem of needing to purchase two separate primes for full-body and headshots/upperbody.
I'm guessing weight, size, and not enough background blur.

Yes, the 35 distorts, but easier to use as a one lens solution. But among your choices, the 50 would be best for indoor portraits, particularly closeups.

35 makes for a fantastic general purpose lens if you want a lot of environmental shots. I have a 50 and 100 combo and it works nicely together. I have a 24-70 for the wide shots, and a single lens solution on my various day trips.
__________________
Flickr
Gear
Charlie is online now   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 5th of April 2013 (Fri)   #4
Ladera
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 124
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

I would say the 50mm would be better for closeups.
__________________
5D Mark III / 35L / 24-105L / 600ex-rt
Ladera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th of April 2013 (Fri)   #5
SmileThere
Member
 
SmileThere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The downstate of upstate New York
Posts: 85
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightdiver13 View Post
Why are you selling the 24-70? To me, that's one of the best indoor studio lenses and solves the problem of needing to purchase two separate primes for full-body and headshots/upperbody.
I just don't connect with zoom lenses. I bought both at the beginning when I was learning the basics of photography. But no matter how many times I have tried to use the 24-70, I just didn't 'connect' with it. I don't like zooming in and out and never managed to get shots that are as sharp as my 100mm. I think I want to stick to primes.
__________________
~ Esther

I've got me a 5D, 100mm and looking to sell my 24-70 almost brand new lens.
SmileThere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th of April 2013 (Fri)   #6
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 5,607
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

If you don't need AF I'd get a C/Y Zeiss 50/1.4. The more I browse this thread http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=644277 the more I'm thinking of getting one as my next lens...
__________________
6D + EG-S // EOS M // Yashica ML 50/1.4/1.7/2 // V3 Vivitar S1 70-210/2.8-4 // Rokinon 85/1.4 // Yashica ML 28/2.8 // Sears MC 135/2.8
Fuji X-E1 // XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4 // XF 35mm f/1.4 // Kipon BavEyes EF focal reducer

flickr // www.LucasGPhotos.com
EverydayGetaway is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5th of April 2013 (Fri)   #7
DreDaze
Cream of the Crop
 
DreDaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 14,610
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

which 35mm and 50mm's are you discussing...there's quite a few
__________________
Andre or Dre
gear list
flickr
DreDaze is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5th of April 2013 (Fri)   #8
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
 
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Providence RI
Posts: 39,969
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DreDaze View Post
which 35mm and 50mm's are you discussing...there's quite a few
OMG this is all I could think about while reading the whole thread. I can't see how we got this far without this info.
Quote:
I wasn't even aware that there's a 40mm lens. How come that's rarely mentioned?
well, here, there is only one made by Canon, and it's really new. It's rarely mentioned because it is so new. It's chief advantage is size, for which speed (f/2.8 prime) was sacrificed. That said, I understand it to be a sweet little lens.
CyberDyneSystems is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5th of April 2013 (Fri)   #9
XxDJCyberLoverxX
Senior Member
 
XxDJCyberLoverxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 1,029
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

These two lenses are for studio use, right? I had a zoom, sold it for primes 'cause I thought I was a prime guy, and now I realize how useful a good standard zoom is in my kit.

But, different strokes for different folks and you'll only realize what you need after you've tried all of the lenses.

What apertures are you planning to shoot at inside the studio? Creamy bokeh? Depends on WHICH 35mm & 50mm you're referring to, like what DreDaze & CyberDynesSystems mentioned. Shooting at f/8 against a white backdrop in the studio would not render much creamy bokeh.

I have a Samyang 35mm & a 40mm pancake. Both could be awesome lenses for studio work because you control all of the factors. If you're not doing full body portraits, a 40mm or 50mm focal length might do be better.
__________________
Daniel
Sony a7 (!!!) / 40D / Sony/Zeiss FE 24-70mm / Canon 60mm Macro / 70-200 f/4L IS
POTN Feedback / My Work!
XxDJCyberLoverxX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of April 2013 (Sat)   #10
SmileThere
Member
 
SmileThere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The downstate of upstate New York
Posts: 85
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

Thanks for all your input.

Honestly, I don't know which 35 & 50 because I'm not sure what I'd need in studio. I plan on doing toddlers and newborns more than older kids, but that will most likely happen as well sometimes.

XxDJCyber - These are mainly for in studio. I love my 100mm and I plan to continue using my 100mm outdoors when I can. I have tried to like my 24-70, trying it again and again, but can't seem to 'get' it. I love having a focal length set and being the one to move around as opposed to having the zoom doing the moving for me.

I plan to use it at large apertures and having backgrounds. Definitely not white.
__________________
~ Esther

I've got me a 5D, 100mm and looking to sell my 24-70 almost brand new lens.
SmileThere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of April 2013 (Sat)   #11
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 10,333
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmileThere View Post
I plan to use it at large apertures and having backgrounds. Definitely not white.
Consider the Sigma 35 1.4. Best 35 out there optically, and its not white (none of them are).
__________________
-Tom
Flickr
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review
Sirrith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2013 (Sun)   #12
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 16,399
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

newborns and toddlers I would take 50mm over 35mm which will distort more as you need to be much closer. Since you mention fast primes I am assuming natural light not using studio strobes. How big is the space? I prefer 85mm over even 50mm but 50mm f1.4 would be more versatile. I would go for AF than MF if shooting kids. Choose between canon or sigma. Had both and both are quite nice.
__________________
5dmk3, 6d, Sigma Art 35mm f1.4, 35L, 85mm f1.4, 85L II, 24-70mm f2.8 II, 70-200mm f2.8 IS II
bobbyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of April 2013 (Sun)   #13
SmileThere
Member
 
SmileThere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The downstate of upstate New York
Posts: 85
Default Re: Canon 35mm vs 50mm (or 40mm?)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirrith View Post
Consider the Sigma 35 1.4. Best 35 out there optically, and its not white (none of them are).
I think I'm leaning towards the 50mm. And the white was a response to someone that was discussing backgrounds, not the lenses.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyz View Post
newborns and toddlers I would take 50mm over 35mm which will distort more as you need to be much closer. Since you mention fast primes I am assuming natural light not using studio strobes. How big is the space? I prefer 85mm over even 50mm but 50mm f1.4 would be more versatile. I would go for AF than MF if shooting kids. Choose between canon or sigma. Had both and both are quite nice.
Yes, the consensus seems to be that the 35 will give me more distortion. I think I'm going to need studio strobes sometimes, but would like to stick to natural as much as possible. The space doesn't exist yet. I am in the practicing stage and will be doing more on location, or in my own home. I am definitely going AF with kids.
__________________
~ Esther

I've got me a 5D, 100mm and looking to sell my 24-70 almost brand new lens.
SmileThere is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which FF lens for walkaround: 35mm f/2, 40mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8? riotshield Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 55 28th of December 2012 (Fri) 01:01
Canon 17-40mm vs 16-35mm II colonel Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 15 26th of January 2011 (Wed) 04:20
Canon 17-40mm f/4L or 17-35mm f/2.8L jj fad Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 8 22nd of September 2009 (Tue) 16:30
Tamron 17-35mm vs Canon 17-40mm krulexxx Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 6 4th of November 2005 (Fri) 23:02


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.