Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras
Thread started 07 Jul 2013 (Sunday) 02:21
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

6D Vs 70D

 
Kim ­ F
Member
Kim F's Avatar
56 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Canberra, Australia
Jul 07, 2013 02:21 |  #1

I can't see a similar thread. I have permission from Minister of Finance to upgrade my 30D and I was going down the 6d path but now looking at the specs for the 70D, I am a tad confused. In the value for money considerations, I have to take into consideration my EF-S 10-22 which gets sent to the back of the cupboard if I go down the 6D path. GPS doesn't excite me too much but low light performance is a big plus. Anyone else going through this deliberation?




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
10,028 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Jul 07, 2013 02:51 |  #2

6D for sure. If the minister of finance ok's the more expensive body, then go for it.

70D is a new item, value will go down a LOT faster than the 6D, which has kind of stabilized. You can sell off the 10-22 in favor of the 17-40, which in some ways better, and some ways worst.


Flickr (external link)
Sony A7r | A7rii | 70-400G ||| Canon EF 100f2 | EF 135f2 L ||| Nikkor 14-24f2.8G | 200f2
OM 24f2.8 | 200f5 ||| Voigtlander 12f5.6 | 40f1.4 ||| Zeiss FE 55f1.8
Full Gear List and Helpful Links

LOG IN TO REPLY
xinvisionx
Goldmember
xinvisionx's Avatar
Joined Dec 2010
Mesa, AZ
Jul 07, 2013 03:10 |  #3

Charlie wrote in post #16098069external link
6D for sure. If the minister of finance ok's the more expensive body, then go for it.

70D is a new item, value will go down a LOT faster than the 6D, which has kind of stabilized. You can sell off the 10-22 in favor of the 17-40, which in some ways better, and some ways worst.

Agreed. A crop is as a knife as a ff is a gun to a fight.


My name is James ~ Gear ~ Facebook Fan Pageexternal link ~ Domainexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
apthai86
Member
96 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Jul 07, 2013 03:13 |  #4

Both are/will be excellent cameras but the real question you need to answer before deciding is what type of shooting do you do? If you do wildlife or sports then the 70D will suit you better. If shooting portraits or landscape then the 6D's full frame will suit you better. Once we know what type of subjects you shoot it'll help with providing which one is better for you.


Canon 5D Mark III (BG-E11 Grip) | Canon 24-105mm ƒ/4L IS | Canon 35mm ƒ/1.4L | Canon 50mm ƒ/1.4 |Canon 135mm ƒ/2L |FEISOL CT-3442 | FEISOL CB-50DC Ball Head

LOG IN TO REPLY
Kim ­ F
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Kim F's Avatar
56 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Canberra, Australia
Jul 07, 2013 03:44 |  #5

apthai86 wrote in post #16098090external link
Both are/will be excellent cameras but the real question you need to answer before deciding is what type of shooting do you do? If you do wildlife or sports then the 70D will suit you better. If shooting portraits or landscape then the 6D's full frame will suit you better. Once we know what type of subjects you shoot it'll help with providing which one is better for you.

Mainly landscapes and then portraits.




LOG IN TO REPLY
xinvisionx
Goldmember
xinvisionx's Avatar
Joined Dec 2010
Mesa, AZ
Jul 07, 2013 03:47 |  #6

Kim F wrote in post #16098119external link
Mainly landscapes and then portraits.

6D. Simple.


My name is James ~ Gear ~ Facebook Fan Pageexternal link ~ Domainexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Cyth0n
Senior Member
283 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Jul 07, 2013 04:37 |  #7

I recently upgraded from a 30D to a 6D and gave up a 10-22 and 17-55 for it. Full frame is nice but it won't make your pictures magically better. That's all just fluff. The usefulness of shallower DoF is overblown as well. However, it is much easier to post process photos on a 6D due to improved dynamic range, less noise, and a better noise profile generally. You can pull back highlights and push shadows without worrying about degrading image quality too much. The larger viewfinder is also a big plus for me, especially when equipped with a precision focusing screen. It is genuinely easy to manually focus, whereas on the 30D it was hit and miss at best. I don't imagine a 70D would be better than the 30D in this respect.

Needless to say, the 6Ds high ISO performance is exceptional. ISO 12800 is cleaner than ISO 3200 on the 30D. ISO 25600 and 51200 aren't too bad with some aggressive noise reduction. In all honesty, if you have some decent fast glass, you'll be hard pushed to find situation where ISO 25600 and 51200 are actually necessary anyway. I would be surprised if the 70D was as capable as the 6D in this category.

As for lenses, the 10-22 was a hard one to give up. In my opinion, there aren't any wide lenses for full frame that are as good as the 10-22 without spending $$$$ on the 16-35. The 24-105 is a pretty good substitute for the 17-55 f/2.8 though. What I have found is that a lot of the primes start to make more sense on full frame. I bought the Sigma 35 f1.4 which is a lovely field of view and it hasn't come off my camera since. 50mm and 85mm aren't bad either.

I think that if you shoot a lot of sports or wildlife, or shoot exclusively in JPEG, then you'd probably be better off with the 70D. If you shoot RAW, prefer wide photography, portrait, or low light photography, the 6D is a clear winner.


[My Galleryexternal link]

LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Jul 07, 2013 17:10 |  #8

Kim F wrote in post #16098119external link
Mainly landscapes and then portraits.

then my vote would also be the 6D




LOG IN TO REPLY
sega62
Senior Member
sega62's Avatar
754 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Jul 07, 2013 17:14 |  #9

Kim F wrote in post #16098037external link
I can't see a similar thread. I have permission from Minister of Finance to upgrade my 30D and I was going down the 6d path but now looking at the specs for the 70D, I am a tad confused. In the value for money considerations, I have to take into consideration my EF-S 10-22 which gets sent to the back of the cupboard if I go down the 6D path. GPS doesn't excite me too much but low light performance is a big plus. Anyone else going through this deliberation?

http://snapsort.com ...n-EOS-6D-vs-Canon-EOS-70Dexternal link




LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jan 2011
Tucson AZ
Jul 07, 2013 17:25 as a reply to sega62's post |  #10

snapsport pretty much sucks for comparison.
Heck, they already have the 7d2 specs listed.
weak.
but yes the 6d is the clear winner here given the choices.


Jeremy
7d, 100-400L, 17-55 2.8 IS, Sigma 10-20, 50mm 1.8, 18-55 IS,430 exII
My Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberManiaK
Senior Member
661 posts
Joined Jan 2009
So.Cal
Jul 07, 2013 17:26 |  #11

Why you don't wait until the 70D is out to SEE exactly what the new sensor can do.


Carlos.
60D / 10-20 + 24-105L + 100L + 40/2.8 \

LOG IN TO REPLY
WC4Glam
Member
98 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Jul 07, 2013 17:39 |  #12

Marked.
I have similar interest but fascinate by 70d ability to tilt screen and AF by touch screen. That maybe more versatile for family of 3 children.


70D;50D; 18-135 STM, macro 100mm, 2.8; 35mm;Tamron 17-50mm, 2.8; canon 28-135mm; 580EX II, MR14EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,117 posts
Joined Aug 2007
San Jose, California
Jul 07, 2013 17:58 |  #13

I'm sure all these folks have used 70Ds alongside their 6Ds extensively, to be able to give you valid and useful comparisons.

Oh wait, the 70D isn't out until mid-August or early September! :rolleyes:


Alan Myers "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII(x2), 7D(x2), other cameras. 10-22mm, Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, 100/2.8 USM, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, studio strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link) - EXPOSUREMANAGER (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Cream of the Crop
Left Handed Brisket's Avatar
Joined Jun 2011
The Uwharrie Mts, NC
Jul 07, 2013 18:36 |  #14

Kim F wrote in post #16098037external link
Anyone else going through this deliberation?

yes. been deliberating for 6 months. I was close to pre-ordering the 70D, and spent the better part of the announcement day looking at specs and speculation. I really, really need better low light performance and am not sure the 70D is going to deliver anything overwhelming in that department.

I can deal with the hobbled focusing on the 6D, it's got to be better than my XSi.

The 70D video features are sick, but i'm not yet marketing video services.

Ended up ordering the 6D last night from B&H.

Package deal with the camera, 24-105L, Canon Pixma Pro printer, and a puny little 16 gig card.

$2599 - $200 instant rebate - $400 mail in rebate = $1999

the deal can be found here http://photography-on-the.net/forum/forumdis​play.php?f=89

but i think the $200 instant rebate ended at midnight.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Formerly he's gone before apostrophe-gate | Not in gear database: Canon 70-210 3.5-4.5, Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 2x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mavgirl
Senior Member
647 posts
Joined Mar 2013
Dallas area
Jul 07, 2013 19:27 |  #15

Kim F wrote in post #16098037external link
I can't see a similar thread. I have permission from Minister of Finance to upgrade my 30D and I was going down the 6d path but now looking at the specs for the 70D, I am a tad confused. In the value for money considerations, I have to take into consideration my EF-S 10-22 which gets sent to the back of the cupboard if I go down the 6D path. GPS doesn't excite me too much but low light performance is a big plus. Anyone else going through this deliberation?

It's hard to decide between the two because the 70D isn't even in people's hands yet. If you're on the fence I'd wait until it comes out and see what kind of real world results people get. I think its better to wait to buy (since we know the specs and know it's coming out) then to pull the trigger now and end up wishing you'd bought a different camera.


6D/50D/350D with too many lenses
Calumet 4x5, Pentax SV 35mm, Canon A-1, Rebel G and many more toys...

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

23,066 views & 0 likes for this thread
6D Vs 70D
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00305 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Sebastian73
629 guests, 434 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015