Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk
Thread started 16 Sep 2013 (Monday) 09:15
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Image Stabalization mode 1 or 2 for baseball

 
bwtmom
Member
81 posts
Joined May 2004
Sep 16, 2013 09:15 |  #1

Right now I'm shooting a lot of baseball. I have the stabalizer mode on 1 and consequetive shooting. Are these the best settings for baseball. I like to track the player at the plate and around the bases as well as action shots on field. I feel like I'm all over the place at times and don't have a lot of time to make setting adjustments. Some are sharp and some are blurry. Advise/tips would be appreciated.

Lens - 70-200 2.8 IS USM
Camera - 7D

Thanks,
Bridget




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
bwtmom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
81 posts
Joined May 2004
Sep 16, 2013 09:18 |  #2

Also, I have it set to AI focus.....tried servo but it seemed to want to hunt around too much.

Thanks,
Bridget




LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
Cream of the Crop
namasste's Avatar
6,787 posts
Joined Jul 2007
NE Ohio
Sep 16, 2013 09:40 |  #3

Baseball being outside, your light is usually good. This means shutter speeds should be high enough to negate any real benefit from IS. In, fact, there could even be a small (probably imperceptible) lag as the IS spins up from time to time. That said, I would not use IS for baseball shooting. As for AI modes Servo for sure.


Scott Evans Photographyexternal link
SportsShooterProfileexternal link l MaxPreps Profileexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
Hof8231
Member
89 posts
Joined Jun 2013
Sep 16, 2013 11:21 |  #4

I don't use IS when I shoot any sports as long as my shutter speeds are high (which they always are for sports.) As stated above, turning IS off can actually help the AF speed a little bit, which, while miniscule, will help you more in the long run than IS would.


Bodies:
Canon EOS 1DX, Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Lenses: Sigma 15mm f/2.8 diagonal fisheye, Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 DG OS HSM,, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 1.4 and 2x extenders.

LOG IN TO REPLY
mrrikki
Senior Member
mrrikki's Avatar
909 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Bristol, UK
Sep 16, 2013 13:36 |  #5

I don't use IS so much so when I bought a canon 70-200 I got the non IS version, I have OS on my Sigma but didn't use it once last Rugby season. Also it helps the battery last longer, also always AI Servo.


GEAR: Canon 7D Mark II, 7D & 6D Lenses: Canon 300 f2.8 L IS, 70-200 f2.8 L, 24-105 L, Canon 50mm f1.8 & Sigma 1.4x Converter.
Website www.rmtphotos.co.uk (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Hof8231
Member
89 posts
Joined Jun 2013
Sep 16, 2013 14:02 |  #6

Yeah, if I had known how little I'd use IS/OS/VC/whatever other companies call it, I would have snagged the 70-200 2.8 non-IS. The only lenses I really care about having IS on now are ones I use for my "walk-around" photography as I like to shoot at night a lot.

edit: also mrrikki, how would you say your Sigma 70-200 compares to your Canon version? I'm curious how theirs and Tamoron's compare. I love my Sigma 120-300 and Tamron 24-70, but I've never tried either of their 70-200s.


Bodies:
Canon EOS 1DX, Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Lenses: Sigma 15mm f/2.8 diagonal fisheye, Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC, Sigma 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 DG OS HSM,, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, Canon 1.4 and 2x extenders.

LOG IN TO REPLY
mrrikki
Senior Member
mrrikki's Avatar
909 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Bristol, UK
Sep 16, 2013 16:16 |  #7

Hof8231 wrote in post #16301304external link
Yeah, if I had known how little I'd use IS/OS/VC/whatever other companies call it, I would have snagged the 70-200 2.8 non-IS. The only lenses I really care about having IS on now are ones I use for my "walk-around" photography as I like to shoot at night a lot.

edit: also mrrikki, how would you say your Sigma 70-200 compares to your Canon version? I'm curious how theirs and Tamoron's compare. I love my Sigma 120-300 and Tamron 24-70, but I've never tried either of their 70-200s.

I love the Sigma 70 200, I don't notice a huge difference between it and my Canon 70 200. As I earn money fom photography the only reason have both is that I always like a spare, I normally use the sigma with an extender. Also the Canon I bought new for £650 which is £300 off current Amazon price, only issue was that it does not have a tripod collar!


GEAR: Canon 7D Mark II, 7D & 6D Lenses: Canon 300 f2.8 L IS, 70-200 f2.8 L, 24-105 L, Canon 50mm f1.8 & Sigma 1.4x Converter.
Website www.rmtphotos.co.uk (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
mark2009
Goldmember
mark2009's Avatar
Joined Dec 2010
Northeast , USA
Sep 16, 2013 16:28 as a reply to mrrikki's post |  #8

For me, I would be on ai servo, center point focus, keep your shutter speed around 1/1600.
Two ways you can do this are tv mode, and set your shutter speed, camera will do the rest, or I would use av mode, set your apature , maybe f3.2, and play with your iso to get the shutter up around 1/1600...should not be difficult. Center point focus is key, if your letting the camera pick them out side, it could pick the fence, grass...etc...




LOG IN TO REPLY
mrrikki
Senior Member
mrrikki's Avatar
909 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Bristol, UK
Sep 16, 2013 16:33 |  #9

Also back button focus helps a lot, mark is right I normally use AV, but I am normally set at f2.8 due to crap UK weather :) with practice you will get used to checking shutter speed and quickly changing ISO when the cloud / weather conditions etc. change.


GEAR: Canon 7D Mark II, 7D & 6D Lenses: Canon 300 f2.8 L IS, 70-200 f2.8 L, 24-105 L, Canon 50mm f1.8 & Sigma 1.4x Converter.
Website www.rmtphotos.co.uk (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
ChunkyDA
Goldmember
ChunkyDA's Avatar
Joined Apr 2007
Emerald Coast, FL
Sep 16, 2013 18:21 |  #10

Original question, leave IS off for fast shutter speed sports


Dave
Support Search and Rescue, Get Lostexternal link
Gear list and some feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
FA_Productions
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2005
Fayetteville, GA
Sep 25, 2013 16:50 |  #11

IS is OFF for sports


Canon 7D, 1D mkIII - 580EX Speedlite
Canon 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-200L, 100-400L

jwtphoto.comexternal link | Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Cream of the Crop
apersson850's Avatar
11,402 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Traryd, Sweden
Oct 03, 2013 08:07 as a reply to FA_Productions's post |  #12

I agree. But since the athletes I usually take pictures of tend to run in the same direction for a while at a time, IS works pretty well, especially in mode 2.


Anders

LOG IN TO REPLY
npompei
Senior Member
563 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Warrington, PA
Oct 08, 2013 11:07 |  #13

This is shocking to me! So you guys really turn OFF IS when shutter speeds are high enough?!

So when I take my rented 400 2.8 IS version II lens down to the Eagles game next Sunday you suggest to leave IS off?! For a 1pm game, lighting should be plenty good, even with a cloudy/rainy day.
I know that lens, the IS takes a second for it to spin up so maybe I will gain quicker focus without it?

I'm shocked. I don't know on a $10k+ lens I want to turn off IS! haha


www.nickpompei.com (external link)
Flickr (external link)
Canon 5d3-gripped / Canon 5d / Canon EOS M / Phottix Mitros + (3) / Tamron 17-35 (2.8-4.0) / Tamron 28-75 (2.8) / Canon 35L / Canon 50 (1.4) / Sigma 85 (1.4) / Canon 70-200(2.8)IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
mrrikki
Senior Member
mrrikki's Avatar
909 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Bristol, UK
Oct 08, 2013 11:48 |  #14

All phototogrqphers I know at games use a monopod for 400s, I never use IS as shutter speeds are so high that it does not matter, this saves a bit if battery life and focus very slightly but not really noticeable I think.

I use a 70-200 2.8 and a 70-200 2.8 with a x2 extender making it a 400; so I can't give personally experience with the 400.


GEAR: Canon 7D Mark II, 7D & 6D Lenses: Canon 300 f2.8 L IS, 70-200 f2.8 L, 24-105 L, Canon 50mm f1.8 & Sigma 1.4x Converter.
Website www.rmtphotos.co.uk (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Cgb628
Member
152 posts
Joined Nov 2012
North Carolina
Nov 04, 2013 01:30 |  #15

Monopod is to carry the weight, shutter speed is to freeze the motion, image stabilization is to assist the AF and composition. I follow the advice of Rudy Winston and leave it on. http://youtu.be/3_F7lC​vp5DI?t=21m37sexternal link


1DX - 1D3
24-70L - 135L - 300/2.8L IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,417 views & 0 likes for this thread
Image Stabalization mode 1 or 2 for baseball
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0012 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is JCP88
977 guests, 431 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016