Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 06 Feb 2006 (Monday) 13:22
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon 135f2.8 Soft Focus ....kind of a review!

 
schmoelzel
Lord of the Holy Trinity
1,889 posts
Joined Aug 2001

London (Canada)
MORE INFO

Greetings from WINTER here in Southwestern Ontario Canada! I recently moved into a very well-established and historic neighbourhood here in London Ontario and I was approached by a neighbour whilst taking shots of Julia. He mentioned that he was also into photography but hadn't yet taken the digital plunge! He was also a Canon shooter and went to show me his favourite lens, the EF 135f2.8 SF lens. I have heard and read about this prime but hadn't seen or touched one before. After a little photography chit-chat, I suggested that he borrow my 135L for a day and I would try out his 135f2.8. That was yesterday and here is my brief experience with this lens:

Build

Not even close to the 135L but actually feels fairly robust. He didn't have a hood so I am not sure if the 135L hood would fit......I assume it doesn't. The only comparison I could make is to my ex-50f1.4 which is not too shabby. But again, the 135L feels more substantial and just exudes confidence.

AF Speed

No USM (I think this is one of Canon's older lenses) but it isn't loud or raspy as some other consumer primes. I think I am spoiled by the 135L and its super-fast AF so this did seem a little slower but in actual use, I found it more than acceptable. Remember that Julia is now a fast-moving toddler so the AF speed is beginning to make a noticable difference in my shooting. I have to say that unless you are very very picky with AF speed, you won't be bothered by the slightly slower AF that this lens offers.

Optics

Here is where I can say that I was rather impressed by this lens! It is sharp. Is it as sharp as the 135L? No, but very few lenses are and it is very very close wide-open. I have heard that CA can be a problem with this lens but I didn't really check since I rarely take shots of Julia climbing up a tree!! :lol: The colour and contrast were also very good even though I prefer the more saturated colours that I get from the 135L. That said, many will appreciate the lighter colour tones and accurate skin-tones that I got with the f2.8 version. The rather fast aperture is also a nice thing to have........I was shooting next to a window and it was cloudy and snowing yesterday. I did try the SF feature that this lens boasts but I didn't like it at all..........I guess when they originally made this lens, Photoshop was in it's infancy and to get this type of soft effect for portraits was something that was done in-camera. I found that the colours and contrast were also too muted for my taste with the SF on.........needless to say, I took two or three shots with the SF on, chimped to see what they were like, hated them and switched it off!! All in all, for a lens that is 1/3 the price of the L, it is rather good and I am happy with quite a few of the shots that got! If I didn't have the L, I would be happy to have the 135f2.8 SF!

My neighbour thankfully returned my 135L today and said he also enjoyed using it very much!! I was just thankful that he returned it!!:lol:
Anyhow, not too make this too long, here are a few of the shots (Julia of course!!:lol:) that I took..........I think that if you can find a good used copy, this lens is quite good! Thanks for looking and comments and critiques are always welcome!!

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Camera: Canon 1D
Shutter speed: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8
Exposure mode: Manual
Flash: Off
Metering mode: Spot
Drive mode: Single frame shooting
ISO: 320
Lens: 135.0 mm
Focal length: 135.0mm
AF mode: One-shot AF

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Camera: Canon 1D
Shutter speed: 1/250 sec
Aperture: 2.8
Exposure mode: Manual
Flash: Off
Metering mode: Spot
Drive mode: Single frame shooting
ISO: 320
Lens: 135.0 mm
Focal length: 135.0mm
AF mode: One-shot AF

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Camera: Canon 1D
Shutter speed: 1/160 sec
Aperture: 2.8
Exposure mode: Manual
Flash: Off
Metering mode: Spot
Drive mode: Single frame shooting
ISO: 250
Lens: 135.0 mm
Focal length: 135.0mm
Feb 06, 2006 13:22



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Mark_Cohran's Avatar
15,554 posts

Joined Jul 2002

Portland, Oregon
MORE INFO

I have both of these lenses - and I have to agree with all of your conclusions.

Mark

Feb 06, 2006 13:28

Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Thirty-five years of shooting and still learning.
My Tumblr Siteexternal link (NSFW)

LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
In2Photos's Avatar
19,808 posts

Joined Dec 2005

Near Charlotte, NC.
MORE INFO

Thank you for this wonderful little review. After the advice you gave me last week I played around with my 50mm 1.8 some more and found that it just blows my Tamron away (Sharpness) for candid shots of my daughter. I have decided that I need some more primes and this will be on my list if money for the L isn't available.

Feb 06, 2006 13:32 as a reply to Mark_Cohran's post 4 minutes earlier.

Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

LOG IN TO REPLY
rdenney
Rick "who is not suited for any one title" Denney
2,399 posts
Joined Jun 2003
MORE INFO

The 135/2.8 SF uses the same lens hood as the 85/1.8.

Rick "who also doesn't like the soft focus effects on this lens" Denney

Feb 06, 2006 15:19

The List

LOG IN TO REPLY
JMHPhotography
Goldmember
JMHPhotography's Avatar
4,783 posts

Joined May 2005

New Hampshire
MORE INFO

Once again you've proven that it's not as much the gear as it is the operator. these pictures are just beautiful and I'm having a tough time seeing any lack in color saturation. You must have enhanced the color in PP? Either way Julia is adorable and your photography is inspiring. I think if I were able to produce shots like this, I'd be thrilled regardless of the glass used to get them.

Feb 06, 2006 15:34

~John

(aka forkball)
Have a peek into my Gearbag. and My flickrexternal link
editing of my photos by permission only. Thanks

LOG IN TO REPLY
blue_max
Goldmember
blue_max's Avatar
2,622 posts

Joined Mar 2005

London UK
MORE INFO

schmoelzel, I was just going to say is that you - and it is when I looked!

Those shots are you're signature. I look at the exif data and there is no clue to how you achieve such immaculate shots. I have read your workflow, but there is still something missing from my shots (with 50mm 1.4 - see pic).

I have a theory that it is the wonderful light in Ontario, (along with far too much talent, of course :lol: ). That last shot could almost be with a 85mm 1.2

Sounds like the 135 SF's are going to be flying off the shelves pretty soon!

Thanks for the review (still like my f2 though!).

Graham

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE
Feb 06, 2006 15:52 as a reply to JMHPhotography's post 18 minutes earlier.

.
Lamb dressed as mutton.

LOG IN TO REPLY
KevC
Goldmember
KevC's Avatar
3,154 posts

Joined Jan 2005

to
MORE INFO

schmoelzel: I love your work. As a request, could you please shoot with some cheaper lenses? Maybe like the 50mm f/1.8 or Sigma 24-70EX or something.. hehe. I want to see how you fare with those, as I bet you will produce brilliant images!!

London eh... mind if I drop by one day and we'll go shooting! Maybe you can teach something :)

Feb 06, 2006 16:22

Too much gear...
take nothing but pictures .... kill nothing but time .... leave nothing but footprints

LOG IN TO REPLY
mrclark321
Noinker
mrclark321's Avatar
7,510 posts

Joined Mar 2005

.... with a long history
MORE INFO

Great shots Michael( as usual )

Dan

Feb 06, 2006 17:58

A crap pile of various gear!

LOG IN TO REPLY
schmoelzel
THREAD ­ STARTER
Lord of the Holy Trinity
1,889 posts
Joined Aug 2001

London (Canada)
MORE INFO

Thanks for the nice compliments! I had a PM asking why I used a high ISO (320).........to get a decent exposure I had to bump it up a little. Not one of the 1D's strong suits but works in a pinch!!

Feb 07, 2006 06:29



LOG IN TO REPLY
RAitch
Goldmember
RAitch's Avatar
2,917 posts

Joined Mar 2005

Sarnia Ontario, Canada
MORE INFO

KevC wrote:
schmoelzel: I love your work. As a request, could you please shoot with some cheaper lenses? Maybe like the 50mm f/1.8 or Sigma 24-70EX or something.. hehe. I want to see how you fare with those, as I bet you will produce brilliant images!!

London eh... mind if I drop by one day and we'll go shooting! Maybe you can teach something :)

Stalk his posts and you'll find some shots as you describe... it doesn't matter, the guy is a portrait god!
Good going Michael... what a nice guy to trade away your 135L for a day. WOW!

Feb 09, 2006 21:00 as a reply to KevC's post 3 days earlier.

See Through The Lensexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
rdenney
Rick "who is not suited for any one title" Denney
2,399 posts
Joined Jun 2003
MORE INFO

blue_max wrote:
Those shots are you're signature. I look at the exif data and there is no clue to how you achieve such immaculate shots. I have read your workflow, but there is still something missing from my shots (with 50mm 1.4 - see pic).

You didn't ask me, and I hope you don't mind if I presume to comment.

The difference between your image above and Schmoezel's image further up is not that great. But here it is: He took care of his background, came in close to get rid of what didn't contribute to the story of the picture, and adjusted color and mid-tone values to achieve brightness and warmth. Your skin tones are cool by comparison, and the background is too much in focus and too much of the composition. If you had moved in much closer, showing only the face and the portion of the "art" that tells the story, then selected a white balance that warmed up the skin tones, and increased the center of the tone curve to brighten up the middle range, you'd be a lot closer. Compare the percentage of the frame taken up by face in your picture compared to Schmoelzel's.

Edit: I see that you've allowed edits, so I've taken the liberty of testing my own comments, attached.

Okay, that's enough from a guy whose portraits aspire to be as good as what you have presented, heh, heh.

Rick "just another idiot critic" Denney

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
Feb 09, 2006 21:13 as a reply to blue_max's post 3 days earlier.

The List

LOG IN TO REPLY
cjm
Goldmember
cjm's Avatar
4,744 posts

Joined Mar 2005

Edmonton, Alberta
MORE INFO

I'm looking into buying this lens, does anyone have any more samples with the soft focus and hows the SF with things other then people?

Jun 27, 2006 19:10

Christopher J Martin
Gear: 5DMK2 - 1D MKIII - G16 - 24mm f1.4 L - 17-40 f4 L - 24-105mm IS F4 L - 70-200mm IS f2.8 L - 100mm IS f2.8 L - 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS DO - 100-400 f4.5-5.6 IS L and more... Join me on my photoblog at instagram.com/christop​herjohnmartin

LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
11,386 posts
Joined Feb 2005

Mayberry
MORE INFO
banned

In the review on www.fredmiranda.comexternal link, there is a comment or two to the effect that the SF is a bit too overpowering, although the lens is very sharp and great without the SF feature.

Jun 27, 2006 19:37


Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
cjm
Goldmember
cjm's Avatar
4,744 posts

Joined Mar 2005

Edmonton, Alberta
MORE INFO

No one uses this lens that can contribute any more samples?

Apr 11, 2007 23:31

Christopher J Martin
Gear: 5DMK2 - 1D MKIII - G16 - 24mm f1.4 L - 17-40 f4 L - 24-105mm IS F4 L - 70-200mm IS f2.8 L - 100mm IS f2.8 L - 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS DO - 100-400 f4.5-5.6 IS L and more... Join me on my photoblog at instagram.com/christop​herjohnmartin

LOG IN TO REPLY
folville
Goldmember
folville's Avatar
1,022 posts

Joined Dec 2006

MN
MORE INFO

I have used this lens for a couple of months for sports, birds, portraits, and everything that my shorter lenses just can't quite reach. While it's not a phenominal lens, I've been very pleased with its performance in almost every avenue. It's AF speed, however, simply isn't good enough, so i've now set it aside in favor of the 70-200 f/2.8, which is much better suited to my needs.

Here is a cropped photographic comparison of a shot from the 135 SF and one from the 70-200, both at f/2.8. It is a 100% crop, but the image has been resized to 50%. I can post a 100% image later if somebody is willing to host it. Take a look for yourself.


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img144.imagesha​ck.us ...rpnesstestsmallbu7.​th.png (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/jpeg'



Oh, the 135 SF is on the left, and the 70-200 is on the right. Both were focused on the corner intersection in the center of the curtain.
Jun 24, 2007 12:01

135mm f/2.8 SF for sale

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

33,886 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon 135f2.8 Soft Focus ....kind of a review!
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00382 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is Cnguyen492
613 guests, 484 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015