Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 14 Sep 2014 (Sunday) 01:06
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

200-400 aviation raw files to download...

 
Perfectly ­ Frank
I'm too sexy for my lens
Joined Oct 2010
Sep 14, 2014 01:06 |  #1

I rented the 200-400 and took it to my local airport. With my 1D4 I shot a number of prop and jet planes. Hand held and at various shutter speeds. Most were with the 1.4x engaged. A few were with an external 1.4xIII attached. I was surprised how well some of these shots came out at 784mm.

Note: this is not a lens test. But it does give one an idea of what this lens can do for aviation photography. I'm sure some are better at panning than I, so keep that in mind. Images greater than 560mm were taken with an external 1.4xIII attached.

Bombardier jet 560mm
https://dl.dropboxuser​content.com/u/39824303​/AU4C5145.CR2external link

Prop 560mm
https://dl.dropboxuser​content.com/u/39824303​/AU4C5209.CR2external link

Jet 490mm
https://dl.dropboxuser​content.com/u/39824303​/AU4C5228.CR2external link

Cessna 172 600mm
https://dl.dropboxuser​content.com/u/39824303​/AU4C5465.CR2external link

Gulfstream IV
https://dl.dropboxuser​content.com/u/39824303​/AU4C5496.CR2external link

AT-6 784mm
https://dl.dropboxuser​content.com/u/39824303​/AU4C5419.CR2external link

Bellanca 560mm
https://dl.dropboxuser​content.com/u/39824303​/AU4C5157.CR2external link

Prop 645mm
https://dl.dropboxuser​content.com/u/39824303​/AU4C5348.CR2external link


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
DJHaze596
Goldmember
DJHaze596's Avatar
1,397 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined May 2012
Florida
Sep 14, 2014 09:00 |  #2

1/180th? Are you crazy? lol They look a bit soft to me. Should of took the lens to a Zoo.


Canon C200 | Canon 5D Mark IV | 16-35 f4L IS USM | 24-105mm f4L
50mm STM | 70-200mm f2.8L II | 100-400mmL II | 400mm f2.8L IS USM
Previously Owned: 1DX Mark II | Canon 5D Mark IV | 7D Mark II | 1D Mark IV

LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Talley's Avatar
10,139 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Joined Dec 2011
Houston
Sep 14, 2014 09:44 |  #3

DJHaze596 wrote in post #17153401external link
1/180th? Are you crazy? lol They look a bit soft to me. Should of took the lens to a Zoo.

Yup... animal fur is a great sharpness test subject!


5D4 |12mm 2.8 FE | 16-35L 2.8 III | Σ 35A | Σ 50A | Σ 85A | 200 F2 IS | 1.4xIII
X-T20 | X-E3 | 18/2 | 35/1.4 | 56/1.2 | 18-135
My Gear Archive

LOG IN TO REPLY
NinetyEight
"Banned for life"
NinetyEight's Avatar
Joined Sep 2008
Dorset - England
Sep 14, 2014 09:45 |  #4

DJHaze596 wrote in post #17153401external link
1/180th? Are you crazy? lol They look a bit soft to me. Should of took the lens to a Zoo.

One is a t 1/160th at 645mm! - Probably for the 'prop blur'? - Mind you, f/16 - f/18 doesn't help as diffraction will be softening the images.

A friend of mine has bought a 200-400 (:mad:) and even with a separately attached 1.4x converter it is capable of superb results.


Kev

LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfectly ­ Frank
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm too sexy for my lens
Joined Oct 2010
Sep 14, 2014 10:06 |  #5

DJHaze596 wrote in post #17153401external link
1/180th? Are you crazy? lol They look a bit soft to me.

Aviation photographers shoot at slow shutter speeds to capture prop blur. But I agree, many are a bit soft, even the jets at higher speeds. I didn't apply any sharpening.


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
kjonnnn
Goldmember
1,181 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Chicago, Illinois
Sep 14, 2014 10:53 |  #6

Perfectly Frank wrote in post #17153479external link
Aviation photographers shoot at slow shutter speeds to capture prop blur. But I agree, many are a bit soft, even the jets at higher speeds. I didn't apply any sharpening.

At 1/180 you're introducing alot more camera shake than prop blur into the image at that focal length I think was the point.




LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2010
Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
Sep 14, 2014 11:25 |  #7

There are more than one or two shooters out there that can nail 500mm and 1/60 quite regularly. I'm sure the keeper rates are not high, but they do it consistently. Many think that 1/160 is almost a maximum shutter speed for propellor driven aircraft. So if you are at ISO100 you either stop down or use a filter. If you then want to quickly move to a jet at 1/1000 then the filter is a bit cumbersum.

Helicopters usually need around 1/100 or slower. The bigger the helicopter the slower you usually need. Things like Seakings won't come near to showing a full disk blur (which would take 1/5th of a rotor rotation) at 1/60s shutter speed.

Alan


My Flickr (external link)
My new Aviation images blog site (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
FEChariot's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
Sep 14, 2014 18:24 |  #8

kjonnnn wrote in post #17153549external link
At 1/180 you're introducing alot more camera shake than prop blur into the image at that focal length I think was the point.

With two 1.4 TCs on a 1.3 crop camera, one should be able to hit at 1/1000" with out IS. With 4 stop IS in the 200-400, that should bring it down to 1/60".


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfectly ­ Frank
THREAD ­ STARTER
I'm too sexy for my lens
Joined Oct 2010
Sep 15, 2014 00:21 |  #9

kjonnnn wrote in post #17153549external link
At 1/180 you're introducing alot more camera shake than prop blur into the image at that focal length I think was the point.

That may very well be. I only had about 3 hours to use the lens, and it's heavier than my 300 f2.8. Perhaps more practice will help. I usually don't shoot aircraft
at greater than 500mm, except for the high flying aerobatic planes. I just wanted to see what the lens - and me - could do above 560mm.

Although even at 1/750s my jet shots are a bit soft. Adding 3 or 4 points of sharpening in dpp cleans them up pretty well.

I use a filter in my 300 f2.8 to keep the f number reasonable. But I forgot to bring it with the 200-400.


My flickr albums (external link)
My Best Aviation Photos (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,331 views & 0 likes for this thread
200-400 aviation raw files to download...
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00137 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is Thbaz
984 guests, 474 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017