Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Kids & Family Talk 
Thread started 02 Jul 2015 (Thursday) 05:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Best Canon L Series Lens Suited for Portait Photography and Action Shots of Children and Family.

 
JaysLittleOcean
Hatchling
Avatar
8 posts
Joined Jun 2015
Location: Mohegan Lake, NY, United States
     
Jul 02, 2015 05:03 |  #1

Hello everyone, I was hoping you could give some advice to someone who needs to learn a lot more about photography in general. I have owned a Canon T4i with a standard Canon 18-135mm Lens and just recently decided to purchase a Canon 7d Mark II with a Canon 100mm F:2.8 L Series Macro Lens. However, I was looking for suggestions regarding a non prime Canon L Series Lens that would be a suitable all around lens for portrait photography of my three boys and my wife when we are out and about. Any suggestions and tips would be helpful.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
birder_herper
Senior Member
715 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jul 02, 2015 05:09 |  #2

The whole line of 70-200mm lenses.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LarryPlane
Member
49 posts
Likes: 52
Joined Feb 2015
     
Jul 02, 2015 12:58 |  #3

Well for portraits, the 24-105 f4L is a good 'entry' priced L lens. I have hired one in the past and in the studio it covers pretty much all the ranges I like to cover, unless I am in a giant studio and I can use the 70-200, and most of the time I usually leave it at around 90mm on F8, and adjust the lights to suit.

But for sports, this lens is not really ideal. The F4 is less than stellar for sports and the reach could be limiting as well. If you have the money, the 70-200 f2.8 L would do you for both sports and portraits, although unless you are working in a large studio you probably won't use the lens beyond 110-ish, depending on how close you like your close ups to be :) but out in the field, for sports, you would love it, and with an extender you would do even better. And being a 2.8 the stop or two you would lose from an extender wouldn't impact you as much.

Of course the 70-200 2.8 L is a might expensive lens!

So there's that!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShotByTom
Goldmember
Avatar
2,975 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 69
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis
     
Jul 02, 2015 13:28 |  #4

The 70-200 is very long on a crop camera. I would agree with the 24-105 recommendation, it's a fantastic lens.


Gear
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EchoShotz
Senior Member
Avatar
309 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Feb 2014
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
Jul 02, 2015 13:36 |  #5

Agree on the 24-105. You'll probably never take it off your camera:-)


5D Mark III, 70-200 f/2.8L, 24-70 f/2.8 L, YN560 (2x)
-Kenny

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Niccas9
Senior Member
Avatar
798 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 131
Joined Jun 2011
Location: California
     
Jul 02, 2015 14:14 |  #6

I know you specifically asked for "L" suggestions, and I would agree with the others on the 25-105, however, the Tamron 28-75 2.8 is worth looking at. I know you said you have the 100L already and the 28-75 Tamron is a gem of a lens and can be found for $250-300 pretty easily. I own a 70-200, 85L, and 50 but I use the 28-75 most (85L is still my favorite by far)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
WaterBoy2090
Member
175 posts
Gallery: 61 photos
Likes: 142
Joined Jun 2014
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jul 02, 2015 14:16 |  #7

The 24-70mm f2.8L II, used with my 7D mark II has produced some great candid and portrait shots, using either natural light or bounced flash.

The focusing speed & accuracy of this lens, its image quality & aperture mean I consistently capture those great moments with my very young & fast family, with very little editing required.

It is a heavier camera & lens though compared to the T4i with 18-135mm lens, which is worth considering if you are planning on walking around with it all day.


7D Mark II
10-18 f4.5-5.6 is, 24-70 f2.8L II, 70-200 f2.8L is II, 100-400 f4.5-5.6L is II, TC1.4, & 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JaysLittleOcean
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
Avatar
8 posts
Joined Jun 2015
Location: Mohegan Lake, NY, United States
     
Jul 02, 2015 17:24 |  #8

Thanks everyone for the suggestions. I'm still learning how to use the camera and the lenses. So don't stone me in front of village square for asking this. But the F measurement is how much light can be let in through the lens? So the lower the number the more light the better the picture?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mainbyte
Senior Member
Avatar
332 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Southern Indiana
Post edited over 2 years ago by mainbyte.
     
Jul 02, 2015 18:04 |  #9

Yes, the lower the f stop (it is a ratio), the more light that comes in, doesn't necessarily make a better photo. Normally you use the f-stop, shutter speed and/or iso to make adjustments for the style of photo you are looking for.

Here is a fun simulator that will let you play with these 3 settings, and see how they effect the outcome of the photo.

http://camerasim.com/a​pps/camera-simulator/ (external link)

Edit: Meant to mention, (again, normally) the lower the f-stop the more background blur you will get.

Ron


Canon 6D | Canon 7DII | 17-40 f/4L | 24-105 f/4L | 70-300 4/5.6L |100mm f/2.8L macro | 50mm 1.4 | 580exII | 2 - 430exII |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phoenixkh
a mere speck
6,599 posts
Gallery: 59 photos
Likes: 1172
Joined May 2011
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Post edited over 2 years ago by Phoenixkh.
     
Jul 02, 2015 18:16 |  #10

Actually, the 100-400ii takes nice portraits if you are outside and have the room. It's also great at action shots. It might not be ideal for portraits but it can work in a pinch.

And it's almost like the 7D2 and 100-400ii were designed for each other. What a combo.


Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
RRS tripod and monopod | 580EXII | Cinch 1 & Loop 3 Special Edition | Editing Encouraged

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aressem
Goldmember
Avatar
4,355 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 473
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 03, 2015 09:11 |  #11

JaysLittleOcean wrote in post #17617799 (external link)
Hello everyone, I was hoping you could give some advice to someone who needs to learn a lot more about photography in general. I have owned a Canon T4i with a standard Canon 18-135mm Lens and just recently decided to purchase a Canon 7d Mark II with a Canon 100mm F:2.8 L Series Macro Lens. However, I was looking for suggestions regarding a non prime Canon L Series Lens that would be a suitable all around lens for portrait photography of my three boys and my wife when we are out and about. Any suggestions and tips would be helpful.

No brainer for me. Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 Art.


Ryan Mackay WEBSITE (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link) | GEAR LIST | Buy & Sell Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,193 posts
Likes: 466
Joined Mar 2012
Location: By The Lake in Big D
     
Jul 03, 2015 11:28 |  #12

Agree with the 25-105 suggestion. The Swiss Army Knife of lenses. If you ever decide to get rid of it (and why would you ), you can get practically all your money back for it on the used market.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
seahorse12
Member
37 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2014
Location: Tennessee
     
Jul 04, 2015 20:45 |  #13

24-105 is my go to for all around kid chasing...


Always trying to learn!
Canon 5D MIII, 24-70 2.8 MII, 70-200 IS f/4, 50mm f/1.4
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,993 posts
Likes: 967
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 04, 2015 21:13 |  #14

Not an L, but much more useful on a 7DII is the 17-55 2.8 IS. One big problem with limiting your choice to L lenses is that canon does not make L lenses in the ef-sformst. Ef-s lenses allow for a wider sngle of view on an aps-c sensor like the one in your camera. But really dont buy a new lens until you get a better grasp of the terminology and why things do what they do. Invest in a copy of understanding exposure, a book by bryan peterson. It will help immensely.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waterrockets
Goldmember
Avatar
3,872 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 188
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Austin (near TX)
     
Jul 04, 2015 23:20 |  #15

24-105 is my walk around lens, but action is often at a bit more distance, so my 70-200 f/2.8L is what I use when I know my kids are going to be on the move.


1D MkIV | 1D MkIII | 550D w/grip & ML| EF 70-200mm f2.8L| EF 24-105mm f4L IS | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC | 430EXii | EF 50mm f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

9,039 views & 5 likes for this thread
Best Canon L Series Lens Suited for Portait Photography and Action Shots of Children and Family.
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Kids & Family Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ChrisS76a
759 guests, 403 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.