Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Underwater Photography 
Thread started 12 Sep 2015 (Saturday) 16:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Outex VS Ewa Marine - Thoughts?

 
RussellJ
Member
Avatar
217 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 194
Joined Jul 2013
Location: San Diego, Ca
     
Sep 12, 2015 16:46 |  #1

Looking to get into some underwater photography this year and see where it can go since I live in San Diego. Right now I dont want to get a hard housing since its a bit much, so looking at these two. I like and dislike somethings about each but would love to hear full thoughts from those who own them.

Outex

- Fits a great range of cameras and longer lens like the 300mm F4 so I can do surf from in the water.
- Dome Port Upgrade, If I like shooting I can upgrade to a dome port down the line
- packs up really tight in the bag
- Small and Lightweight

Ewa Marine

- Has a good warrenty
- Some of the bags can go to 150ft
- It looks like the bag wont take longer lens
- Looks easyer to shoot sense you can see the buttons
- Non changeable glass, outex you just buy a new one

Im just wandering what is best bet for shooting in 15-20 ft of water. Shooting 1D Mark IV and the 16-35 F4 Lens but might want to go use a 135 L or 70-200 down the road to mix it up.


Outdoor Adventure Photographer
Darktide Photo - darktidephoto.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lyle ­ Krannichfeld
Senior Member
374 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 111
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Kihei, HI
     
Oct 23, 2015 19:35 |  #2

Don't do either. Save for a proper housing. Surf housing sounds like a better bet. Trust me, it's a false savings when your camera is flooded.


Fine Art Landscape/Wildlife Photographer on Maui: INSTAGRAM (external link) FACEBOOK (external link)
Canon 5DS R, 8-15 f/4L, 16-35 f/4L IS, 24-70 f/2.8 IIL, Rokinon 14mm, Aquatica housing for 5d3/5dS R with 9.25" Megadome, 2x YS-D1, 2x 600EX-RT, ST-E3-RT, Gitzo GT2541, RRS BH-40, 2x PW+3's with Waterwizard housings, Lee, ThinkTank, Lexar, Pelican, F Stop.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
uwphotoguy
Member
Avatar
31 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2014
     
Oct 25, 2015 09:20 |  #3

And if investing in a housing is not a big priority, look at P&S alternatives. You will not need/want to shoot a long lens underwater. The less water between you and the subject, the better. Wander on over to underwater photography sites and explore the topic a bit. I'm sure you can start down the road with a minimal investment (even a Go Pro) and get a feel for this type of photography. Bottom line, I would not risk the SLR/lens in a bag-type housing. All it takes is one leak to lead to an expensive outing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lyle ­ Krannichfeld
Senior Member
374 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 111
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Kihei, HI
     
Oct 27, 2015 15:16 |  #4

^agreed. As for focal length, you'll shoot wide underwater and probably no more than 85 or so for surf, more likely wide as well. Surf housing are designed to take a beating, both options you listed will very quickly ruin your day.


Fine Art Landscape/Wildlife Photographer on Maui: INSTAGRAM (external link) FACEBOOK (external link)
Canon 5DS R, 8-15 f/4L, 16-35 f/4L IS, 24-70 f/2.8 IIL, Rokinon 14mm, Aquatica housing for 5d3/5dS R with 9.25" Megadome, 2x YS-D1, 2x 600EX-RT, ST-E3-RT, Gitzo GT2541, RRS BH-40, 2x PW+3's with Waterwizard housings, Lee, ThinkTank, Lexar, Pelican, F Stop.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yeamans17
Senior Member
Avatar
536 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 684
Joined May 2007
Location: Simsbury, CT
     
Nov 15, 2015 12:27 as a reply to  @ Lyle Krannichfeld's post |  #5

I would disagree with the long lens opinions here, I just bought a 70-200 port for my SPL housing though so I might be a little biased. But I will whole heartedly back the statement not to purchase the bags. Everyone I know who has used one has drowned their camera.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,410 views & 0 likes for this thread
Outex VS Ewa Marine - Thoughts?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Underwater Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Lausti
601 guests, 332 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.