Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 04 Mar 2006 (Saturday) 17:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

 
cali
Senior Member
Avatar
266 posts
Joined Jan 2006
     
Mar 04, 2006 17:10 |  #1

I am curious to know what kind of results it produces. I have noticed that it lacks sharpness and does not perform under low light. If you do have some good shots with it then I know it is not the lens but because of my failure to set it up correctly. Please post some sample pics that you have taken with the 17-85.


20D, 17-85 kit lens, 70-200 F4, 50 1.4, Amvona AT CF 994 Tripod, Manrotto Monopod that I have never used and a 580EX Flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
JohnnyBlood
Senior Member
Avatar
283 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Madison, WI
     
Mar 04, 2006 17:23 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

I think it is a fine lens. Here are three examples of photographs I have taken with the Canon 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM:

IMAGE: http://static.flickr.com/41/97017183_19685f6842.jpg

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Full-size versions of these photographs and other photographs taken with my Canon 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM can be seen here:

http://www.flickr.com …s/tags/efs1785m​mf456isusm (external link)

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/latitudes/ (external link)

Canon 5D (external link) & 20D (external link)

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 (external link)
Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 (external link), 16-35mm f/2.8L (external link), 24-105mm f/4L (external link), 35mm f/1.4L (external link), 50mm f/1.8 II (external link), 85mm f/1.8 (external link), 100mm f/2.8 (external link)
Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC (external link), 120-300mm f/2.8 APO EX DG (external link)
Other Carl Zeiss Flektogon 35mm f/2.8 (external link), Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 (external link), Jupiter9 85mm f/2 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cali
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
266 posts
Joined Jan 2006
     
Mar 04, 2006 17:30 |  #3

Todd, I didn't know you lingered around here. I don't know if you remember me but I was the guy who asked you to show your work on flickr with the 17-85. I like your results. I cannot seem to get the sharpness and punch to my pictures that you do. My username on flickr is dmarkj22 so if you get a chance then look up my pictures and let me know what you think. What do you have your parameters set to? I remember that you said that all you used was Elements for PP. What do you do to your pics in PP?


20D, 17-85 kit lens, 70-200 F4, 50 1.4, Amvona AT CF 994 Tripod, Manrotto Monopod that I have never used and a 580EX Flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnnyBlood
Senior Member
Avatar
283 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Madison, WI
     
Mar 04, 2006 17:40 as a reply to  @ cali's post |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Virtually every photograph I capture is done so using the RAW mode. I also set the camera to Parameter 1. However, I also use Photoshop Elements 4.0 for post-processing, as well as the Noise Ninja plug-in. By learning how to properly white balance photographs when taking them, adjust the color, saturation and contrast using levels in Photoshop Elements 4.0, and occaisionally using layers to enhance an image, I have learned how to make many of my 20D images pop. Alas, there is still much to learn.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/latitudes/ (external link)

Canon 5D (external link) & 20D (external link)

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 (external link)
Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 (external link), 16-35mm f/2.8L (external link), 24-105mm f/4L (external link), 35mm f/1.4L (external link), 50mm f/1.8 II (external link), 85mm f/1.8 (external link), 100mm f/2.8 (external link)
Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC (external link), 120-300mm f/2.8 APO EX DG (external link)
Other Carl Zeiss Flektogon 35mm f/2.8 (external link), Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 (external link), Jupiter9 85mm f/2 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
22,728 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 276
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Mar 04, 2006 23:47 as a reply to  @ post 1252203 |  #5

Johnnyblood -- you have a good eye. i always enjoy your stuph :cool: .

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 35mm ef-s macro, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542, gitzo GM4562, markins Q10, markins Q3, kirk, really right stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnnyBlood
Senior Member
Avatar
283 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Madison, WI
     
Mar 05, 2006 05:38 as a reply to  @ ed rader's post |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Thanks, Rader, I appreciate that very much. I'm still learning about the wonderful world of light and color and I have a long way to go.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/latitudes/ (external link)

Canon 5D (external link) & 20D (external link)

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 (external link)
Canon EF 15mm f/2.8 (external link), 16-35mm f/2.8L (external link), 24-105mm f/4L (external link), 35mm f/1.4L (external link), 50mm f/1.8 II (external link), 85mm f/1.8 (external link), 100mm f/2.8 (external link)
Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DC (external link), 120-300mm f/2.8 APO EX DG (external link)
Other Carl Zeiss Flektogon 35mm f/2.8 (external link), Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 (external link), Jupiter9 85mm f/2 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blacksmurf
Member
Avatar
229 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Italy
     
Mar 05, 2006 11:00 as a reply to  @ JohnnyBlood's post |  #7

Thanks JohnnyBlood, you convinced me to always carry the 17-85IS for my walk-arounds, even if I'm fascinated by the primes.


G6; 30D, 40D, 28F1.8, 50F1.4, 60F2.8M, 85F1.8, 10-22, 17-85IS, 70-300IS
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/ilcantiere/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,808 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Near Charlotte, NC.
     
Mar 05, 2006 17:51 as a reply to  @ blacksmurf's post |  #8

Need some more examples for the lens archive. Come on folks, post those pics.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OdiN1701
Goldmember
Avatar
2,523 posts
Joined Jul 2005
     
Mar 05, 2006 20:55 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

cali wrote:
I am curious to know what kind of results it produces. I have noticed that it lacks sharpness and does not perform under low light. If you do have some good shots with it then I know it is not the lens but because of my failure to set it up correctly. Please post some sample pics that you have taken with the 17-85.

Here is one I took with that lens in Death Valley.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Actually...if you go here:

http://www.andrewstiff​.com/gallery/deva (external link)

Most of those were with the 17-85. Most are not thoroughly post-processed (the above was..just not the highest quality JPG). Some were taken with a 50mm f/1.4 but I don't remember which exactly. Anyway there are some good pictures, some not so good, but the quality of the lens is good. I sold mine in order to go with L glass and I decided that I'm not going to get EF-S mounts in case I move to a full frame camera here...which I want to do. Although, if I did and kept my 20D as backup, the 17-85mm would make a good permanent fixture to it so I may pick one up again if that happens.

SAY NO TO SPEC WORK! (external link)
_______________
40D w/ Grip |
20D w/ Grip | 10D
10-22mm|17-40f/4L|24-105f/4LIS|70-200f/2.8LIS|50f/1.4|100f/2.8Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hephaistos
Junior Member
Avatar
25 posts
Joined Jan 2006
     
Mar 06, 2006 05:36 as a reply to  @ OdiN1701's post |  #10

hello,

here are some shots done withe the 17-85, hope it helps !

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


;)

canon 350d + 17-85 is usm + Sigma 70/200 f2,8 EX + 50 mm 1,8 + canon 580 ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stetner
Member
Avatar
44 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Brisbane Australia
     
Mar 06, 2006 08:10 |  #11

FYI I was having trouble with some of my shots. Then tested my 17-85 as follows:

at 17mm:
focus on something very close.
focus on something ar about 3m
focus on infinity
focus on the same thing at 3m

Try at say 50mm and 85.

I found my lens would focus differently depending if it came from infinity or from close up. It would be at a visibly different distance. IE when focusing on that object 3m away, in one case it would focus at 1.5 on the ring, from the other side it would sit at 3m.

Sent it away and they listed 'clean, focus adjust' and it is working great now.

In other words, do a bit of testing to see if you can see what is going on....

Doug


Equipment: Canon 7D
Canon EF 24-70 F2.8 L - Canon EF-S 10-22mm F3.5-4.5 USM - Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM - Canon 50mm f/1.8 II - Canon MPE-65 - Tamron 90 mm f/2.8 1:1 Macro - Canon MT-24EX Macro Twin Lite - Canon Speedlite 580 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bakewell
Goldmember
1,385 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
     
Mar 07, 2006 08:03 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

Try these with the NEW 30D.....

http://www.dcresource.​com …_30d-review/gallery.shtml (external link)


Dave

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Airedale1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,819 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 171
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Laconia, NH USA
     
Mar 07, 2006 08:14 |  #13

cali wrote:
I have noticed that it lacks sharpness and does not perform under low light. If you do have some good shots with it then I know it is not the lens but because of my failure to set it up correctly.

I find it to be quite sharp and versatile.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon S90

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Airedale1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,819 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 171
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Laconia, NH USA
     
Mar 07, 2006 08:15 as a reply to  @ Airedale1's post |  #14

and 2 more..........


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon S90

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Richkiddy
Hatchling
Avatar
8 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Kidderminster
     
Apr 11, 2006 16:32 |  #15

cali wrote:
I am curious to know what kind of results it produces. I have noticed that it lacks sharpness and does not perform under low light. If you do have some good shots with it then I know it is not the lens but because of my failure to set it up correctly. Please post some sample pics that you have taken with the 17-85.

OK, Just got my first DSLR, 20D with this lens, and here is my first posting of any pic to any internet group. My local church the other morning.

Needed some work, as barrel distortion is quite a bit at 17mm, and has some aberration which I think my Fuji S9500 didn't have. A great camera the Fuji, and would recommend highly (1cm macro too!), but been asked to do a wedding and it's just not flexible and fast enough for that kind of photography.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

223,609 views & 1 like for this thread
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is DouglasAZ
703 guests, 369 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.