LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 04 Mar 2006 (Saturday) 17:10   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
cali
Senior Member
cali's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
266 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I am curious to know what kind of results it produces. I have noticed that it lacks sharpness and does not perform under low light. If you do have some good shots with it then I know it is not the lens but because of my failure to set it up correctly. Please post some sample pics that you have taken with the 17-85.

Post #1, Mar 04, 2006 17:10:39


20D, 17-85 kit lens, 70-200 F4, 50 1.4, Amvona AT CF 994 Tripod, Manrotto Monopod that I have never used and a 580EX Flash

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
JohnnyBlood
Senior Member
JohnnyBlood's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
283 posts
Madison, WI
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

I think it is a fine lens. Here are three examples of photographs I have taken with the Canon 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM:

IMAGE: http://static.flickr.com/41/97017183_19685f6842.jpg

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://static.flickr.c​om/40/94974992_fa5d570​1df.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://static.flickr.c​om/24/56015612_33fb73f​290.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


Full-size versions of these photographs and other photographs taken with my Canon 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM can be seen here:

http://www.flickr.com ...s/tags/efs1785mmf45​6isusmexternal link

Post #2, Mar 04, 2006 17:23:42


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/latitudes/external link

Canon 5Dexternal link & 20Dexternal link

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5external link
Canon EF 15mm f/2.8external link, 16-35mm f/2.8Lexternal link, 24-105mm f/4Lexternal link, 35mm f/1.4Lexternal link, 50mm f/1.8 IIexternal link, 85mm f/1.8external link, 100mm f/2.8external link
Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DCexternal link, 120-300mm f/2.8 APO EX DGexternal link
Other Carl Zeiss Flektogon 35mm f/2.8external link, Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4external link, Jupiter9 85mm f/2external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
cali
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
cali's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
266 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Todd, I didn't know you lingered around here. I don't know if you remember me but I was the guy who asked you to show your work on flickr with the 17-85. I like your results. I cannot seem to get the sharpness and punch to my pictures that you do. My username on flickr is dmarkj22 so if you get a chance then look up my pictures and let me know what you think. What do you have your parameters set to? I remember that you said that all you used was Elements for PP. What do you do to your pics in PP?

Post #3, Mar 04, 2006 17:30:12


20D, 17-85 kit lens, 70-200 F4, 50 1.4, Amvona AT CF 994 Tripod, Manrotto Monopod that I have never used and a 580EX Flash

LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnnyBlood
Senior Member
JohnnyBlood's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
283 posts
Madison, WI
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

Virtually every photograph I capture is done so using the RAW mode. I also set the camera to Parameter 1. However, I also use Photoshop Elements 4.0 for post-processing, as well as the Noise Ninja plug-in. By learning how to properly white balance photographs when taking them, adjust the color, saturation and contrast using levels in Photoshop Elements 4.0, and occaisionally using layers to enhance an image, I have learned how to make many of my 20D images pop. Alas, there is still much to learn.

Post #4, Mar 04, 2006 17:40:03 as a reply to cali's post 9 minutes earlier.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/latitudes/external link

Canon 5Dexternal link & 20Dexternal link

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5external link
Canon EF 15mm f/2.8external link, 16-35mm f/2.8Lexternal link, 24-105mm f/4Lexternal link, 35mm f/1.4Lexternal link, 50mm f/1.8 IIexternal link, 85mm f/1.8external link, 100mm f/2.8external link
Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DCexternal link, 120-300mm f/2.8 APO EX DGexternal link
Other Carl Zeiss Flektogon 35mm f/2.8external link, Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4external link, Jupiter9 85mm f/2external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
Joined May 2005
22,035 posts
silicon valley
[MORE/SHARE]

Johnnyblood -- you have a good eye. i always enjoy your stuph :cool: .

ed rader

Post #5, Mar 04, 2006 23:47:49 as a reply to post 1252203


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/external link
http://erader.zenfolio​.com/external link
5D3, SL1, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L, 35f2 IS, 24mm f2.8 ef-s, 15mm FE (sigma), 270ex II, gitzo, markins, benro

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
JohnnyBlood
Senior Member
JohnnyBlood's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
283 posts
Madison, WI
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

Thanks, Rader, I appreciate that very much. I'm still learning about the wonderful world of light and color and I have a long way to go.

Post #6, Mar 05, 2006 05:38:57 as a reply to ed rader's post 5 hours earlier.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/latitudes/external link

Canon 5Dexternal link & 20Dexternal link

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5external link
Canon EF 15mm f/2.8external link, 16-35mm f/2.8Lexternal link, 24-105mm f/4Lexternal link, 35mm f/1.4Lexternal link, 50mm f/1.8 IIexternal link, 85mm f/1.8external link, 100mm f/2.8external link
Sigma 30mm f/1.4 EX DCexternal link, 120-300mm f/2.8 APO EX DGexternal link
Other Carl Zeiss Flektogon 35mm f/2.8external link, Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4external link, Jupiter9 85mm f/2external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
blacksmurf
Senior Member
blacksmurf's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
229 posts
Italy
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks JohnnyBlood, you convinced me to always carry the 17-85IS for my walk-arounds, even if I'm fascinated by the primes.

Post #7, Mar 05, 2006 11:00:58 as a reply to JohnnyBlood's post 5 hours earlier.


G6; 30D, 40D, 28F1.8, 50F1.4, 60F2.8M, 85F1.8, 10-22, 17-85IS, 70-300IS
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/ilcantiere/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
In2Photos's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
19,808 posts
Near Charlotte, NC.
[MORE/SHARE]

Need some more examples for the lens archive. Come on folks, post those pics.

Post #8, Mar 05, 2006 17:51:53 as a reply to blacksmurf's post 6 hours earlier.


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

LOG IN TO REPLY
OdiN1701
Goldmember
OdiN1701's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
2,523 posts
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

cali wrote:
I am curious to know what kind of results it produces. I have noticed that it lacks sharpness and does not perform under low light. If you do have some good shots with it then I know it is not the lens but because of my failure to set it up correctly. Please post some sample pics that you have taken with the 17-85.

Here is one I took with that lens in Death Valley.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.andrewstiff​.com ...ges/moonovermountai​ns.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Actually...if you go here:

http://www.andrewstiff​.com/gallery/devaexternal link

Most of those were with the 17-85. Most are not thoroughly post-processed (the above was..just not the highest quality JPG). Some were taken with a 50mm f/1.4 but I don't remember which exactly. Anyway there are some good pictures, some not so good, but the quality of the lens is good. I sold mine in order to go with L glass and I decided that I'm not going to get EF-S mounts in case I move to a full frame camera here...which I want to do. Although, if I did and kept my 20D as backup, the 17-85mm would make a good permanent fixture to it so I may pick one up again if that happens.

Post #9, Mar 05, 2006 20:55:27


SAY NO TO SPEC WORK!external link
_______________
40D w/ Grip |
20D w/ Grip | 10D
10-22mm|17-40f/4L|24-105f/4LIS|70-200f/2.8LIS|50f/1.4|100f/2.8Macro

LOG IN TO REPLY
Hephaistos
Junior Member
Hephaistos's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
25 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

hello,

here are some shots done withe the 17-85, hope it helps !

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://artforge.free.f​r/absolut/mouette-seule.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://artforge.free.f​r/absolut/retouche-ciel2.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://artforge.free.f​r/photos/18.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


;)

Post #10, Mar 06, 2006 05:36:54 as a reply to OdiN1701's post 8 hours earlier.


canon 350d + 17-85 is usm + Sigma 70/200 f2,8 EX + 50 mm 1,8 + canon 580 ex

LOG IN TO REPLY
stetner
Member
stetner's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
44 posts
Brisbane Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

FYI I was having trouble with some of my shots. Then tested my 17-85 as follows:

at 17mm:
focus on something very close.
focus on something ar about 3m
focus on infinity
focus on the same thing at 3m

Try at say 50mm and 85.

I found my lens would focus differently depending if it came from infinity or from close up. It would be at a visibly different distance. IE when focusing on that object 3m away, in one case it would focus at 1.5 on the ring, from the other side it would sit at 3m.

Sent it away and they listed 'clean, focus adjust' and it is working great now.

In other words, do a bit of testing to see if you can see what is going on....

Doug

Post #11, Mar 06, 2006 08:10:20


Equipment: Canon 7D
Canon EF 24-70 F2.8 L - Canon EF-S 10-22mm F3.5-4.5 USM - Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM - Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM - Canon 50mm f/1.8 II - Canon MPE-65 - Tamron 90 mm f/2.8 1:1 Macro - Canon MT-24EX Macro Twin Lite - Canon Speedlite 580 EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Bakewell
Goldmember
Joined Jan 2006
1,385 posts
Irvine, CA
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

Try these with the NEW 30D.....

http://www.dcresource.​com ..._30d-review/gallery.shtmlexternal link

Post #12, Mar 07, 2006 08:03:00


Dave

LOG IN TO REPLY
Airedale1
Cream of the Crop
Airedale1's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
5,718 posts
Laconia, NH USA
[MORE/SHARE]

cali wrote:
I have noticed that it lacks sharpness and does not perform under low light. If you do have some good shots with it then I know it is not the lens but because of my failure to set it up correctly.

I find it to be quite sharp and versatile.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #13, Mar 07, 2006 08:14:14


Airedale1Photographyexternal link
EOS 7D EOS 40D
EF-400 f/5.6L EF 70-200 f/4.0L IS EF 50 f/1.4 EF 17-40 f/4.0L IS EF-1.4x II 430EX II Speedlite
Paul Merritt

LOG IN TO REPLY
Airedale1
Cream of the Crop
Airedale1's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
5,718 posts
Laconia, NH USA
[MORE/SHARE]

and 2 more..........

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #14, Mar 07, 2006 08:15:02 as a reply to Airedale1's post 48 seconds earlier.


Airedale1Photographyexternal link
EOS 7D EOS 40D
EF-400 f/5.6L EF 70-200 f/4.0L IS EF 50 f/1.4 EF 17-40 f/4.0L IS EF-1.4x II 430EX II Speedlite
Paul Merritt

LOG IN TO REPLY
Richkiddy
Hatchling
Richkiddy's Avatar
Joined Apr 2006
8 posts
Kidderminster
[MORE/SHARE]

cali wrote:
I am curious to know what kind of results it produces. I have noticed that it lacks sharpness and does not perform under low light. If you do have some good shots with it then I know it is not the lens but because of my failure to set it up correctly. Please post some sample pics that you have taken with the 17-85.

OK, Just got my first DSLR, 20D with this lens, and here is my first posting of any pic to any internet group. My local church the other morning.

Needed some work, as barrel distortion is quite a bit at 17mm, and has some aberration which I think my Fuji S9500 didn't have. A great camera the Fuji, and would recommend highly (1cm macro too!), but been asked to do a wedding and it's just not flexible and fast enough for that kind of photography.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #15, Apr 11, 2006 16:32:27




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
177,948 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00092 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
790 guests, 623 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Blueme

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.