Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 06 Mar 2006 (Monday) 10:55
PREV/NEXT

Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX DG HSM

 
blonde
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
8,405 posts

Joined Oct 2005

Boston, MA
MORE INFO

alright guys,

i am in the market for a nice 70-200 lens and the final debate will be between the canon F4 and the sigma 70-200 2.8. i was actually all set on the sigma but i did some research on here and it seems like a lot of people are having issues with their copy. i see alot with focusing issues, wide opeen softness and even finish peeling off. now, i saw a bunch of threads with people posting some fantastic images with the sigma but i did not see alot of them post pics of the lens wide open. if the lens is rreally soft at 2.8, why not go for the canon f4?

i am asking people that own the sigma to post images on this thread of wide open shots. again, i really do want this lens but if it is almost unusable at 2.8 than i might as well go for the lighter, sharper canon.

Mar 06, 2006 10:55



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Col_M
Goldmember
Col_M's Avatar
1,110 posts

Joined Jan 2006

Prague, Czech Rep.
MORE INFO

Mine will be delivered tomorrow, so weather permitting i should have some pics, i'm trying to think where i can go and there will ba a 100% chance i'll see a duck ;)

Mar 06, 2006 11:02

Col (short for Colin)

5D+Grip¦24-70L¦50 1.4¦100 2.8 Macro¦Sigma 70-200 EX DG¦430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
In2Photos's Avatar
19,808 posts

Joined Dec 2005

Near Charlotte, NC.
MORE INFO

Col_M wrote:
Mine will be delivered tomorrow, so weather permitting i should have some pics, i'm trying to think where i can go and there will ba a 100% chance i'll see a duck ;)

Well here lately it seems that the duck shot can be taken while sitting at your desk. Just pull up a duck on the screen and snap away.:p

Mar 06, 2006 11:07 as a reply to Col_M's post 5 minutes earlier.

Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
THREAD ­ STARTER
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
8,405 posts

Joined Oct 2005

Boston, MA
MORE INFO

haha,

lets open we can get alot of wide open images of this lens first (ducks can work as long as it was shot wide open)

Mar 06, 2006 11:24



LOG IN TO REPLY
freeflydrew
Member
freeflydrew's Avatar
212 posts

Joined Nov 2005

NY
MORE INFO

Here's one... 1/320, 1600 iso, f/2.8, 200 mm (low light):

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Mar 06, 2006 11:26 as a reply to In2Photos's post 19 minutes earlier.

20D and a 50 1.4 - perfect

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
05Xrunner's Avatar
4,596 posts

Joined Dec 2005

Pittsburgh PA
MORE INFO

I just got my 70-200 f4L sat and went to the zoo yesterday.
I am blown away with the image quality.
These are all shot in jpeg and right out of the camera NO post process. I just used AV mode and had it on f4 all day

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i12.photobucket​.com ...4/05Xrunner/IMG_485​32.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i12.photobucket​.com ...24/05Xrunner/IMG_49​06.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i12.photobucket​.com ...24/05Xrunner/IMG_48​39.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i12.photobucket​.com ...24/05Xrunner/IMG_48​31.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

Mar 06, 2006 11:27 as a reply to blonde's post 3 minutes earlier.

My gear
Canon 1D Mark III: Canon 24-105L:Canon 70-200f4L:Sigma 150-600 C:Shanny SN600C flash

LOG IN TO REPLY
GSH
"wetter than an otter's pocket"
GSH's Avatar
3,937 posts

Joined Nov 2004

NE England.
MORE INFO

blonde wrote:
i am in the market for a nice 70-200 lens and the final debate will be between the canon F4 and the sigma 70-200 2.8. i was actually all set on the sigma but i did some research on here and it seems like a lot of people are having issues with their copy. i see alot with focusing issues, wide opeen softness and even finish peeling off. now.


Define " A lot"...

5,10,15, 20....out of how many sales? I'm pretty much certain that the users who are happy with their particular lens (i don't use the term "copy") just get out there and use it, as opposed to pixel-peeping on a net forum and moaning about it. :lol:

As for "Lens tests" on printed focus sheets....err ok, if that's what floats your boat, but i never saw a Photographer sell a shot of a bar code to a magazine :lol:

The nature of sites like this (as good as POTN is) means that those with issues will always shout loudest. I've seen countless posts about problems with assorted Canon L's but very few people are diverted from L fever by those posts, are they? ;)

Now, my 70-200 focusses fast enough to track Race cars & Military Jets, does not need a re-spray and if you want examples of how it performs wide open, here you go...

1# 70mm, 1/1600th @ f2.8.Centre Focus point was on the second girl in the line. This was a large, Fine JPEG straight from the camera using the parameter settings for the 20D suggested on the Sports Illustrated site.

Click!external link

2#. 103mm, 1/320th @ f2.8 in very poor light on a cold January day...

Click!external link

And now something stopped down a little. This was shot at Silverstone Circuit (Luffield Corner) and any of the Motorsports crowd on here will tell you 200mm is too short for there...so it's cropped quite a bit to make up for the lack of focal length. IMHO it's still pretty good...

200mm, 1/320th @ f5.6. Hand-held.

Click!external link

Now, just to give an example of the focus speed. I was heading for the car-park at Silverstone when these 2 cars were approaching...it was a "grabbed" shot and the camera locked on quick enough...

Click!external link

Hope that helps :)

Mar 06, 2006 11:40

Geoff www.bhppix.co.ukexternal link
_______________
I enjoy taking photos. I don't claim to be any good at it :D

LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
THREAD ­ STARTER
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
8,405 posts

Joined Oct 2005

Boston, MA
MORE INFO

thats exactaly what i was looking for!!!! that is why i posted this thread, so i can tak to owners who are happy with their lenses.

any chance you will be selling your copy ? :)

Mar 06, 2006 12:01



LOG IN TO REPLY
Jonn
Member
Jonn's Avatar
75 posts

Joined Aug 2005

Manchester, UK.
MORE INFO

Hope you don't mind 05xRunner, but i had a go at doing some PP to your shots :)

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img303.imagesha​ck.us/img303/8118/potn​19ji.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img309.imagesha​ck.us/img309/861/potn2​6cx.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

Mar 06, 2006 12:08

Canon 5D + Canon BG-E4
Canon 17-40 F/4 L
Canon 24-105 F/4 L IS
Canon 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
GSH
"wetter than an otter's pocket"
GSH's Avatar
3,937 posts

Joined Nov 2004

NE England.
MORE INFO

blonde wrote:
any chance you will be selling your copy ? :)


Ooh let me think about that...

Errm, no. Sorry :)

Mar 06, 2006 12:09 as a reply to blonde's post 8 minutes earlier.

Geoff www.bhppix.co.ukexternal link
_______________
I enjoy taking photos. I don't claim to be any good at it :D

LOG IN TO REPLY
mbellot
"My dog ate my title"
mbellot's Avatar
3,340 posts

Joined Jul 2005

The Miami of Canada - Chicago!
MORE INFO

Just keep in mind that no lens maker is perfect.

My 70-200 IS came with a defective IS unit. :rolleyes:


I also think you need to be careful when looking at wide open sharpness. If the lens was handheld and the shutter was below ~ 1/500 you might be seeing some camera shake or movement in focus.

Mar 06, 2006 12:10 as a reply to blonde's post 8 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
blonde
THREAD ­ STARTER
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
8,405 posts

Joined Oct 2005

Boston, MA
MORE INFO

mbellot wrote:
Just keep in mind that no lens maker is perfect.

My 70-200 IS came with a defective IS unit. :rolleyes:


I also think you need to be careful when looking at wide open sharpness. If the lens was handheld and the shutter was below ~ 1/500 you might be seeing some camera shake or movement in focus.

understood. i am looking for 2.8 in good lighting. i will never fault a lens if it was used in such slow shutter as to produce shake, that is the owners fault.

Mar 06, 2006 12:12 as a reply to mbellot's post 1 minute earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
subtle_spectre
Goldmember
subtle_spectre's Avatar
1,657 posts

Joined Aug 2005
MORE INFO

Okay friends...I did some more testing on the new Sigma 70-200 follwing this morning's round. My results are in my original thread: http://photography-on-the.net ...hp?p=1257921&postco​unt=21

Mar 06, 2006 12:26


Scott
Vista owner...and user  :p _______________

Gear
www.scottcphotography.​comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
GSH
"wetter than an otter's pocket"
GSH's Avatar
3,937 posts

Joined Nov 2004

NE England.
MORE INFO

blonde wrote:
understood. i am looking for 2.8 in good lighting. i will never fault a lens if it was used in such slow shutter as to produce shake, that is the owners fault.


Ooh how about...Summer's day, 1/1600th @ f2.8...(Not wife / Girlfriend safe) ;)

Click!external link

Mar 06, 2006 12:30 as a reply to blonde's post 18 minutes earlier.

Geoff www.bhppix.co.ukexternal link
_______________
I enjoy taking photos. I don't claim to be any good at it :D

LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
THREAD ­ STARTER
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
8,405 posts

Joined Oct 2005

Boston, MA
MORE INFO

GSH, please do not post anymore unless you are willing to sell me your lens :)

j/k of course, those photos are fantastic!!!

scott, that is indeed strange... aree you sure your new 1d is setup right as far as the af focus go?

Mar 06, 2006 12:34



LOG IN TO REPLY

210,174 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX DG HSM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00085 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is manofdogs
922 guests, 690 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014