Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 06 Mar 2006 (Monday) 10:55
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX DG HSM

 
blonde
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
8,405 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Boston, MA
Mar 06, 2006 10:55 |  #1

alright guys,

i am in the market for a nice 70-200 lens and the final debate will be between the canon F4 and the sigma 70-200 2.8. i was actually all set on the sigma but i did some research on here and it seems like a lot of people are having issues with their copy. i see alot with focusing issues, wide opeen softness and even finish peeling off. now, i saw a bunch of threads with people posting some fantastic images with the sigma but i did not see alot of them post pics of the lens wide open. if the lens is rreally soft at 2.8, why not go for the canon f4?

i am asking people that own the sigma to post images on this thread of wide open shots. again, i really do want this lens but if it is almost unusable at 2.8 than i might as well go for the lighter, sharper canon.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Col_M
Goldmember
Col_M's Avatar
1,110 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Prague, Czech Rep.
Mar 06, 2006 11:02 |  #2

Mine will be delivered tomorrow, so weather permitting i should have some pics, i'm trying to think where i can go and there will ba a 100% chance i'll see a duck ;)


Col (short for Colin)

5D+Grip¦24-70L¦50 1.4¦100 2.8 Macro¦Sigma 70-200 EX DG¦430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
In2Photos's Avatar
19,808 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Near Charlotte, NC.
Mar 06, 2006 11:07 as a reply to Col_M's post |  #3

Col_M wrote:
Mine will be delivered tomorrow, so weather permitting i should have some pics, i'm trying to think where i can go and there will ba a 100% chance i'll see a duck ;)

Well here lately it seems that the duck shot can be taken while sitting at your desk. Just pull up a duck on the screen and snap away.:p


Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
THREAD ­ STARTER
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
8,405 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Boston, MA
Mar 06, 2006 11:24 |  #4

haha,

lets open we can get alot of wide open images of this lens first (ducks can work as long as it was shot wide open)




LOG IN TO REPLY
freeflydrew
Member
freeflydrew's Avatar
212 posts
Joined Nov 2005
NY
Mar 06, 2006 11:26 as a reply to In2Photos's post |  #5

Here's one... 1/320, 1600 iso, f/2.8, 200 mm (low light):

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

20D and a 50 1.4 - perfect

LOG IN TO REPLY
05Xrunner
Goldmember, Flipflopper.
05Xrunner's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
Pittsburgh PA
Mar 06, 2006 11:27 as a reply to blonde's post |  #6

I just got my 70-200 f4L sat and went to the zoo yesterday.
I am blown away with the image quality.
These are all shot in jpeg and right out of the camera NO post process. I just used AV mode and had it on f4 all day

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i12.photobucket​.com ...4/05Xrunner/IMG_485​32.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i12.photobucket​.com ...24/05Xrunner/IMG_49​06.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i12.photobucket​.com ...24/05Xrunner/IMG_48​39.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i12.photobucket​.com ...24/05Xrunner/IMG_48​31.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

My gear
Canon 7D Mark II, Sigma 30mm 1.4 Art, Sigma 50 1.4 EX, Canon 85 1.8, Sigma 17-50 2.8OS, Canon 55-250 STM, Sigma 150-600 C, Shanny SN600C flash, Tascam DR-05 v2

LOG IN TO REPLY
GSH
"wetter than an otter's pocket"
GSH's Avatar
3,937 posts
Joined Nov 2004
NE England.
Mar 06, 2006 11:40 |  #7

blonde wrote:
i am in the market for a nice 70-200 lens and the final debate will be between the canon F4 and the sigma 70-200 2.8. i was actually all set on the sigma but i did some research on here and it seems like a lot of people are having issues with their copy. i see alot with focusing issues, wide opeen softness and even finish peeling off. now.


Define " A lot"...

5,10,15, 20....out of how many sales? I'm pretty much certain that the users who are happy with their particular lens (i don't use the term "copy") just get out there and use it, as opposed to pixel-peeping on a net forum and moaning about it. :lol:

As for "Lens tests" on printed focus sheets....err ok, if that's what floats your boat, but i never saw a Photographer sell a shot of a bar code to a magazine :lol:

The nature of sites like this (as good as POTN is) means that those with issues will always shout loudest. I've seen countless posts about problems with assorted Canon L's but very few people are diverted from L fever by those posts, are they? ;)

Now, my 70-200 focusses fast enough to track Race cars & Military Jets, does not need a re-spray and if you want examples of how it performs wide open, here you go...

1# 70mm, 1/1600th @ f2.8.Centre Focus point was on the second girl in the line. This was a large, Fine JPEG straight from the camera using the parameter settings for the 20D suggested on the Sports Illustrated site.

Click!external link

2#. 103mm, 1/320th @ f2.8 in very poor light on a cold January day...

Click!external link

And now something stopped down a little. This was shot at Silverstone Circuit (Luffield Corner) and any of the Motorsports crowd on here will tell you 200mm is too short for there...so it's cropped quite a bit to make up for the lack of focal length. IMHO it's still pretty good...

200mm, 1/320th @ f5.6. Hand-held.

Click!external link

Now, just to give an example of the focus speed. I was heading for the car-park at Silverstone when these 2 cars were approaching...it was a "grabbed" shot and the camera locked on quick enough...

Click!external link

Hope that helps :)


Geoff www.bhppix.co.ukexternal link
_______________
I enjoy taking photos. I don't claim to be any good at it :D

LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
THREAD ­ STARTER
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
8,405 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Boston, MA
Mar 06, 2006 12:01 |  #8

thats exactaly what i was looking for!!!! that is why i posted this thread, so i can tak to owners who are happy with their lenses.

any chance you will be selling your copy ? :)




LOG IN TO REPLY
Jonn
Member
Jonn's Avatar
75 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Manchester, UK.
Mar 06, 2006 12:08 |  #9

Hope you don't mind 05xRunner, but i had a go at doing some PP to your shots :)

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img303.imagesha​ck.us/img303/8118/potn​19ji.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img309.imagesha​ck.us/img309/861/potn2​6cx.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

Canon 5D + Canon BG-E4
Canon 17-40 F/4 L
Canon 24-105 F/4 L IS
Canon 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
GSH
"wetter than an otter's pocket"
GSH's Avatar
3,937 posts
Joined Nov 2004
NE England.
Mar 06, 2006 12:09 as a reply to blonde's post |  #10

blonde wrote:
any chance you will be selling your copy ? :)


Ooh let me think about that...

Errm, no. Sorry :)


Geoff www.bhppix.co.ukexternal link
_______________
I enjoy taking photos. I don't claim to be any good at it :D

LOG IN TO REPLY
mbellot
"My dog ate my title"
mbellot's Avatar
3,344 posts
Joined Jul 2005
The Miami of Canada - Chicago!
Mar 06, 2006 12:10 as a reply to blonde's post |  #11

Just keep in mind that no lens maker is perfect.

My 70-200 IS came with a defective IS unit. :rolleyes:


I also think you need to be careful when looking at wide open sharpness. If the lens was handheld and the shutter was below ~ 1/500 you might be seeing some camera shake or movement in focus.




LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
THREAD ­ STARTER
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
8,405 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Boston, MA
Mar 06, 2006 12:12 as a reply to mbellot's post |  #12

mbellot wrote:
Just keep in mind that no lens maker is perfect.

My 70-200 IS came with a defective IS unit. :rolleyes:


I also think you need to be careful when looking at wide open sharpness. If the lens was handheld and the shutter was below ~ 1/500 you might be seeing some camera shake or movement in focus.

understood. i am looking for 2.8 in good lighting. i will never fault a lens if it was used in such slow shutter as to produce shake, that is the owners fault.




LOG IN TO REPLY
subtle_spectre
Goldmember
subtle_spectre's Avatar
1,657 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Mar 06, 2006 12:26 |  #13

Okay friends...I did some more testing on the new Sigma 70-200 follwing this morning's round. My results are in my original thread: http://photography-on-the.net ...hp?p=1257921&postco​unt=21



Scott
Vista owner...and user  :p _______________

Gear
www.scottcphotography.​comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
GSH
"wetter than an otter's pocket"
GSH's Avatar
3,937 posts
Joined Nov 2004
NE England.
Mar 06, 2006 12:30 as a reply to blonde's post |  #14

blonde wrote:
understood. i am looking for 2.8 in good lighting. i will never fault a lens if it was used in such slow shutter as to produce shake, that is the owners fault.


Ooh how about...Summer's day, 1/1600th @ f2.8...(Not wife / Girlfriend safe) ;)

Click!external link


Geoff www.bhppix.co.ukexternal link
_______________
I enjoy taking photos. I don't claim to be any good at it :D

LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
THREAD ­ STARTER
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
8,405 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Boston, MA
Mar 06, 2006 12:34 |  #15

GSH, please do not post anymore unless you are willing to sell me your lens :)

j/k of course, those photos are fantastic!!!

scott, that is indeed strange... aree you sure your new 1d is setup right as far as the af focus go?




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

227,315 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX DG HSM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00088 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is zgxylhim
1162 guests, 543 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016