Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk 
Thread started 18 Dec 2015 (Friday) 20:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Best Basketball Lens?

 
snegron
Member
211 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Florida
     
Dec 18, 2015 20:57 |  #1

Curious to know what the recommendations are for the best all around basketball lens. I am currently using a 7DM2 and I'm looking for a good all around lens to shoot basketball.

I have read different opinions regarding the best focal length (some swear by a prime 35mm on a cropped sensor to get shots under the net).

I would preffer to go with a zoom only because the fast pace of the players would make it impossible for me to keep up with a semi wide prime lens.

Any suggestions?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
texkam
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,190 posts
Likes: 461
Joined Mar 2012
Location: By The Lake in Big D
     
Dec 18, 2015 21:05 |  #2

70-200




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jelloneck
Senior Member
Avatar
687 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 185
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
     
Dec 18, 2015 21:44 |  #3

I haven't shot basketball yet but should have the opportunity this Sunday. I will be using my 7d2 with a 70-200. If you have a second body I can see having a 24-70 or other wider lens for closer action and under the net shots.


Gear List/Feedback |Instagram (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wallstreetoneil
Goldmember
Avatar
2,085 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 1195
Joined Nov 2014
Location: Toronto Canada
     
Dec 18, 2015 21:47 |  #4

Might be too short but the Sigma 18-35 1.8 might work if you are courtside.

I know I've heard of people using the 85 1.8

24-70 F2.8 is likely another court side choice

Further back and 135F2


Hockey and wedding photographer. Favourite camera / lens combos: a 1DX II with a Tamron 45 1.8 VC, an A7Rii with a Canon 24-70F2.8L II, and a 5DSR with a Tamron 85 1.8 VC. Every lens I own I strongly recommend [Canon (35Lii, 100L Macro, 24-70F2.8ii, 70-200F2.8ii, 100-400Lii), Tamron (45 1.8, 85 1.8), Sigma 24-105]. If there are better lenses out there let me know because I haven't found them.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bpalermini
Goldmember
Avatar
1,193 posts
Gallery: 67 photos
Likes: 476
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Ashland, Oregon
     
Dec 18, 2015 22:56 |  #5

My most used lens is a 70-200 but I put it on a full frame body. When I put it on a crop body I find it a little tight for under the basket so I'd say a 24-70 would be better on a 7DII though you may want to switch to the 70-200 for a while for a different perspective.


Bob Palermini
1DX, 5DIV, 14 Rokinon, 16-35L II, 24-70L II, 100L, 70-200 IS 2.8L, 100-400L II, 400mm 2.8 IS II, 1.4xIII, 2xIII, 580EXII, YN560IV, RRS TVC23 + BH55, LRCC, Fuji X-E2, Fuji X30
My Web Site (external link) | My Sports Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
Avatar
1,190 posts
Likes: 461
Joined Mar 2012
Location: By The Lake in Big D
     
Dec 18, 2015 23:06 |  #6

Yes, the 70-200 is a bit tight on a cropped body, but it's probably still the best choice. I have found the 24-105 to be a better second choice than the 24-70.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,337 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 451
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 19, 2015 07:23 |  #7

I've used a 24-70/2.8L on a 1.3X body before, and I currently use a 70-200/2.8 IS II on a 5D3 and a 1D4 now for the most part.

The 70-200 range is nearly perfect on FF, and just a little tight on 1.3X especially if there is not a ton of room behind the baseline. If this describes your courts and you will be sticking with 1.6X then I would recommend the 24-70/2.8 II.

Here are a couple examples to start, these are both from along the baseline with a 1.3X sensor. In the first image (an away game) that court has a deep area behind the baseline and I would work the 70-200 no problem (this shot is at 80mm). The second shot is at home, the gym is tight to the wall and the 24-70 was a better choice (this shot was at 60mm). You would especially not like being stuck at 70mm on 1.6X in that gym.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,337 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 451
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 19, 2015 07:30 |  #8

One final note, if you do go for the 24-70, you will find it a bit short for guard play out beyond the three-point line. In the end I think it is a little tough to find the 'perfect' single zoom for basketball with either 1.3X or 1.6X. There used to be a Sigma 50-150/2.8 that struck me as about the idea zoom range, but I don't know if the AF performance of that lens was up to the challenge.

Here's some longer reach stuff which is where you will find the 24-70 to be too short.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snegron
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
211 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Florida
     
Dec 19, 2015 07:52 as a reply to  @ JeffreyG's post |  #9

Thanks for feedback. Awesome images!

The courts I will be shooting at are tight regarding space. I hadn't thought about a 70-200 as I was thinking of standing closer near the net. Rethinking the layout of the court now I can see how a 70-200 can be effective. Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zivnuska
Goldmember
Avatar
3,524 posts
Gallery: 59 photos
Likes: 393
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Wichita, Kansas
     
Dec 20, 2015 12:30 |  #10

bpalermini wrote in post #17824338 (external link)
My most used lens is a 70-200 but I put it on a full frame body. When I put it on a crop body I find it a little tight for under the basket so I'd say a 24-70 would be better on a 7DII though you may want to switch to the 70-200 for a while for a different perspective.


+1.


www.zivnuska.zenfolio.​com/blog (external link) = My Blog
Gear List
www.zivnuska.zenfolio.​com (external link)

"It's not tight until you see the color of the irides."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kermit4u
Senior Member
744 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Sep 2009
Location: White Lake, NC
     
Dec 21, 2015 11:27 as a reply to  @ Jelloneck's post |  #11

I use both of these on crop camera and generally prefer the 24-70 for action under the net. Has anyone tried going with an ultra wide.


7D gripped|5DC gripped|50D gripped|Canonet QL17 Giii|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Craign
Goldmember
Avatar
1,188 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 43
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Kentucky
     
Dec 24, 2015 00:04 |  #12

kermit4u wrote in post #17827038 (external link)
I use both of these on crop camera and generally prefer the 24-70 for action under the net. Has anyone tried going with an ultra wide.

Yes, one time and that was enough. Too wide for anything other than a shot or two. Not worth the trouble to carry it.


Canon 7D Mark II w/Canon BG-E16 Battery Grip; Canon EOS 50D w/Canon Battery Grip; Canon SL1; Tokina 12mm - 24mm f/4 PRO DX II; Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS; Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS; Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS; Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM; Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS; Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM; Canon Extender EF 1.4x II; Canon Extender EF 2x II; Canon Speedlite 430EX II Flash
Image Editing Okay

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,337 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 451
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 24, 2015 06:59 |  #13

I take the 16-35 along to games sometimes. It's useless for action, I've never gotten a worthwhile action shot in basketball with anything wider than 35mm.

I do shoot the bench with the UWA. The shots are not especially exciting, but coaches like to have a shot or two that they are in.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kermit4u
Senior Member
744 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Sep 2009
Location: White Lake, NC
     
Dec 24, 2015 09:27 as a reply to  @ Craign's post |  #14

thank you, makes sense


7D gripped|5DC gripped|50D gripped|Canonet QL17 Giii|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zivnuska
Goldmember
Avatar
3,524 posts
Gallery: 59 photos
Likes: 393
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Wichita, Kansas
     
Dec 24, 2015 15:02 |  #15

kermit4u wrote in post #17827038 (external link)
I use both of these on crop camera and generally prefer the 24-70 for action under the net. Has anyone tried going with an ultra wide.


Here's a shot at 35mm taken with the 24-70mm Canon on a full frame camera body. It would be hard to imagine needing much wider than this:

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i137.photobucke​t.com …/2014/ZIVN0426-Edit_1.jpg (external link)

www.zivnuska.zenfolio.​com/blog (external link) = My Blog
Gear List
www.zivnuska.zenfolio.​com (external link)

"It's not tight until you see the color of the irides."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

18,017 views & 19 likes for this thread
Best Basketball Lens?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Gibby391
690 guests, 388 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.