Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 19 Jan 2016 (Tuesday) 09:42
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

50 1.8 vs 50 1.4 vs 50 1.2 L

 
Brad999
Senior Member
420 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Jan 19, 2016 09:42 |  #1

Hi, can someone give me some advice on what differences I could expect on these 3 lenses?

I see the 1.2 is very expensive. Is the 1.4 much better than the 1.8? Is the 1.2 that much better again?

I understand the different f values. Is that the only thing that causes the difference in prices?




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
JeffreyG's Avatar
15,255 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Joined Jan 2007
Detroit, MI
Jan 19, 2016 09:52 |  #2

I've owned all three, but not the newest stm lens.

Both the 1.4 and 1.8 are prone to busy bokeh if that kind of thing bothers you. I sold both and wound up with the 1.2 mainly because I found them both to be innaccurate focusing and prone to hunting in the dark.

The 1.2 is good excepting the price. Reasonably sharp, great bokeh, and about the best performance with flare I've experienced. Also fast, accurate AF.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

LOG IN TO REPLY
Brad999
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
420 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Jan 19, 2016 09:56 as a reply to JeffreyG's post |  #3

Ok, thanks. It wasn't what I wanted to hear, but what I expected.

I have the 1.8
I bought the 1.4 with a new camera purchase and it is on its way. I think I will send the lens back and save up for a used 1.2.




LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,962 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Jan 19, 2016 09:59 |  #4

The 50 1.8II is a cheap lens and with it comes the good and the bad. It's reasonably sharp stopped down to f2 or so but its slow focusing, noisy, and has been known to break in two if handled roughly. You might consider the new 50 STM.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Chet
For $20, I'll be your friend.
Chet's Avatar
42,130 posts
Gallery: 94 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Jan 19, 2016 10:02 |  #5

How about the Sigma? From those that have had the Canon trio, they claim the Sigma 50 Art lens is superior.


Curator of the Bob's Pickle Emporium experience. -As always, One location to serve you better!
~Feel good today and donate to this great forum~ LINK
My Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,962 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Jan 19, 2016 10:05 |  #6

Chet wrote in post #17864307 (external link)
How about the Sigma? From those that have had the Canon trio, they claim the Sigma 50 Art lens is superior.

That's a sound suggestion. Canon hasn't solved the 50.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Brad999
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
420 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Jan 19, 2016 10:05 as a reply to gonzogolf's post |  #7

Does only the 1.8 come with STM? I am reading that it is better at focusing???

THis is the 1.4 I was looking at, but it doesn't say STM on it.

http://www.henrys.com ...N-EF-50MM-1-4-AF-USM.aspx (external link)




LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,962 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Jan 19, 2016 10:11 |  #8

Brad999 wrote in post #17864312 (external link)
Does only the 1.8 come with STM? I am reading that it is better at focusing???

THis is the 1.4 I was looking at, but it doesn't say STM on it.

http://www.henrys.com ...N-EF-50MM-1-4-AF-USM.aspx (external link)

Yes,. The only 50 with STM is the 1.8. It's not so much the STM is better at focusing, its better than the old 50, but its a newer better than the old focus motor. What I mean is that the STM system, which is better for video is not necessarily anything magical compared to usm motors used in better canon lenses.




LOG IN TO REPLY
maverick75
Cream of the Crop
Joined May 2012
Riverside,California
Jan 19, 2016 10:15 |  #9

The 1.8 stm is miles better than the 1.4 usm. Night and day difference. Get the STM.


- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
Brad999
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
420 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Jan 19, 2016 10:23 as a reply to maverick75's post |  #10

How so? I see it is less than half the price for the 1.8 STM compared with the 1.4 USM




LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,962 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Jan 19, 2016 10:25 |  #11

Brad999 wrote in post #17864338 (external link)
How so? I see it is less than half the price for the 1.8 STM compared with the 1.4 USM

The STM is a lot newer design. That generally means sharper. The 1.4 isn't particularly well regarded.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Brad999
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
420 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Jan 19, 2016 10:30 as a reply to gonzogolf's post |  #12

I kind of half asked this on another thread last week, but if I want to take pictures of horses in a barn, does the fact that these 50mm lenses do not have IS mean that it is a no go?




LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,962 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Jan 19, 2016 10:32 |  #13

Brad999 wrote in post #17864348 (external link)
I kind of half asked this on another thread last week, but if I want to take pictures of horses in a barn, does the fact that these 50mm lenses do not have IS mean that it is a no go?

IS doesn't help with moving subjects so unless the horses are very still it doesn't matter much. You'll need a shutter speed fast enough to stop motion, or minimize motion blur.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Brad999
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
420 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Jan 19, 2016 10:36 as a reply to gonzogolf's post |  #14

Ok, in my last thread, it was about hockey, so that is why I was told that IS didn't matter because the players needed such a high shutter speed to stop them.

So as long as your camera can get a high enough shutter speed in the available light to stop the action and get a proper exposure, IS doesn't matter?




LOG IN TO REPLY
nqjudo
Goldmember
nqjudo's Avatar
2,719 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Canada
Post has been edited over 2 years ago by nqjudo.
Jan 19, 2016 10:39 |  #15

I've mentioned the lens reviews over at http://www.photozone.d​e (external link) in a few threads recently. Their reviews are candid but very sensible. Take a look. I'm pretty sure they have reviews of all these lenses.


No photographer is as good as the simplest camera. - Edward Steichen.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

8,683 views & 10 likes for this thread
50 1.8 vs 50 1.4 vs 50 1.2 L
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00153 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Balco
955 guests, 489 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017