Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions
Thread started 04 Oct 2016 (Tuesday) 23:22
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon EF 600mm f/4 DO IS To Arrive in Late 2017?

 
Scrumhalf
Cream of the Crop
Scrumhalf's Avatar
Joined Jul 2012
Portland OR USA
Oct 04, 2016 23:22 |  #1

At least according to CanonRumors.com

http://www.canonrumors​.com ...-arrive-in-late-2017-cr2/ (external link)

I would definitely be up for one if i can get it for a little bit over my 500 II. Although that is probably wishful thinking. Something I am going to be eagerly watching to see if the late 2017 date has any connection to reality or not.


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

flickr (external link)
If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Orogeny
Senior Member
Orogeny's Avatar
Joined Aug 2003
Houston, Texas
Oct 05, 2016 07:48 |  #2

I'm surprised that this isn't getting more attention. I posted about this in the lens rumor section yesterday and no one has commented. I probably still can't afford one, but I love to dream!

Tim


There's someone in my head, and it's not me! - Roger Waters

https://www.flickr.com​/photos/orogeny/ (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2010
Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
Oct 05, 2016 08:41 |  #3

So what advantage does a DO lens of the same maximum aperture provide? Also I noticed that they couldn't even get the image correct. One thing I do know is that the DO lenses are NOT L series, and so don't get a red ring, IIRC they have a green one.

Alan


My Flickr (external link)
My new Aviation images blog site (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
FarmerTed1971's Avatar
Joined Sep 2013
Portland, OR
Oct 05, 2016 08:42 as a reply to BigAl007's post |  #4

Weight and size.


Getting better at this - Fuji Xt-2 - Fuji X-Pro2 - 18-55 - 35 f2 WR - 50-140 - 6D - 135L - 70-200 f4L IS - 600EX-RT x2 - ST-E3-RT - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Scrumhalf's Avatar
Joined Jul 2012
Portland OR USA
Oct 05, 2016 08:45 |  #5

FarmerTed1971 wrote in post #18148899 (external link)
Weight and size.

It's a DO. It's going to be small and light, relatively speaking. If it is the same weight as my 500 II, then I'm looking at it pretty hard. The 500 II is perfectly handholdable for me.


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

flickr (external link)
If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tapeman
Sliced Bread
Tapeman's Avatar
3,694 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Twin Cities
Oct 05, 2016 15:26 |  #6

I wouldn't consider replacing the 500 with one for the weight alone, but if the IQ is better, we'll have to wait & see.


Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
Gitzo 1228, 1275, 1558, Lensbaby 3G. Epson 3880, Bags that match my shoes.:)

LOG IN TO REPLY
buddy4344
Goldmember
Joined Nov 2006
Allentown, PA
Oct 05, 2016 15:49 |  #7

Scrumhalf wrote in post #18148903 (external link)
It's a DO. It's going to be small and light, relatively speaking. If it is the same weight as my 500 II, then I'm looking at it pretty hard. The 500 II is perfectly handholdable for me.

Weight and size are key, but they also actually are compounding in that if it is shorter but even the same weight, it would be easier to handhold. I had the old 400 DO and loved how comfortable that was to handhold and shoot. The only reason I sold it was that the newer 100-400mm verII was just as sharp and, considering we can shoot hight ISO's these days, it was basically a redundant lens to carry along.


Buddy4344

Gear: Canon 1Dx MkII, 7D MkII, Canon Lenses: 100 macro, 100-400 Ver.IIL IS, 24-105L IS, Canon 17-40, Canon 1.4x TCon, Rokinon 14mm. Kenko extension tubes, Kenko 1.4x pro TCon.and Kiboko 30L and 22L+

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Scrumhalf's Avatar
Joined Jul 2012
Portland OR USA
Oct 05, 2016 15:53 |  #8

Agreed with Buddy. The DO will be a better form factor. If it is the same weight as the 500 II (which can be handheld all day), and IQ isn't compromised, I'll take the extra 100mm at F4 any day! Assuming I can pay for the damn thing, of course! :D


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

flickr (external link)
If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tapeman
Sliced Bread
Tapeman's Avatar
3,694 posts
Joined Jan 2004
Twin Cities
Oct 05, 2016 16:45 as a reply to Scrumhalf's post |  #9

Assuming I can pay for the damn thing, of course! :D[/QUOTE]

Probably ten grand.


Canon G1X II, 1D MKIV, 5DSR, 5DIV, 5D MKII, 16-35/2.8L II, 24-70/2.8L II, 70-200/2.8L IS II, IS, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS II, 500/4 L IS II, 24-105/4 IS, 50/2.5 macro, 1.4x MKII, 1.4X MKIII, 2X MKIII,580EX II, 550EXs(2), ST-E2.
Gitzo 1228, 1275, 1558, Lensbaby 3G. Epson 3880, Bags that match my shoes.:)

LOG IN TO REPLY
FuturamaJSP
Goldmember
FuturamaJSP's Avatar
2,225 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Oct 06, 2016 04:32 |  #10

a few years ago there were a rumor about a EF 200 f2.0 DO IS...


They asked me how well I understood theoretical physics. I said I had a theoretical degree in physics. They said welcome aboard! - Fallout New Vegas
blah blah blah
DAexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Scrumhalf's Avatar
Joined Jul 2012
Portland OR USA
Oct 06, 2016 09:30 |  #11

Tapeman wrote in post #18149288 (external link)
Assuming I can pay for the damn thing, of course! :D

Probably ten grand.

We'll have to wait and see. I guess it depends on how much my 500 II will sell for and whether bridging the out-of-pocket difference is something that I want to do.


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

flickr (external link)
If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

LOG IN TO REPLY
John_TX
Goldmember
1,467 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Texas
Oct 06, 2016 22:38 |  #12

A 600 DO IS is badly needed! Canon, please release some information on where this lens is!


5D Mark III | 6D |16-35 f4 IS | 24-105 f4 IS | 70-200 f4 IS | 100-400 II | Sigma 20 f/1.4 ART | Sigma 35 f/1.4 ART | EF 1.4x III | EF 2x II | 480EX II |

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
47,718 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Post has been edited over 1 year ago by CyberDyneSystems.
Oct 06, 2016 22:47 |  #13

If the assumptions and math I did here;
http://photography-on-the.net ...showthread.php?p=18​149017

...are accurate, we are looking at a 7 pound 600mm f/4.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Scrumhalf's Avatar
Joined Jul 2012
Portland OR USA
Oct 06, 2016 22:49 |  #14

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18150446 (external link)
If the assumptions and math I did here;
http://photography-on-the.net ...showthread.php?p=18​149017

...are accurate, we are looking at a 7 pound 600mm f/4.

I'll be down for a 7lb 600/4!


Sam
5D4 | 6D | 7D2 (2 bodies) | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

flickr (external link)
If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Poindexter
Senior Member
Poindexter's Avatar
Joined Feb 2007
Vermont
Oct 30, 2016 07:35 |  #15

CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #18150446 (external link)
If the assumptions and math I did here;
http://photography-on-the.net ...showthread.php?p=18​149017

...are accurate, we are looking at a 7 pound 600mm f/4.

I would totally be down for that! But I'd also be down for just being able to pack other lenses with my 600mm. Shooting with that lens is such a chore in comparison.


flickr (external link) | SmugMug (external link) | Gear (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

2,444 views & 5 likes for this thread
Canon EF 600mm f/4 DO IS To Arrive in Late 2017?
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0012 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.07s
Latest registered member is AsifSalam
984 guests, 451 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016