Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 21 Oct 2016 (Friday) 12:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Godox AD360II vs AD360

 
magicmikey
Senior Member
Avatar
967 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Feb 2005
     
Oct 21, 2016 12:18 |  #1

I have four of the Flashpoint Streaklight 360 units (same as the Godox AD360.) I'd like to add two more units so I have backups but I'm torn between getting the original manual units which are cheaper or the newer versions with TTL. I'm not sure I would use the TTL function that much. I have been using Canon cameras for years and have owned a 430 EX and now a 600 EX-RT and I find Canon's E-TTL system to be more finicky than I like. I wouldn't photograph an event with the speedlite in manual mode but, for off-camera studio lighting, I'm not sure it would save me much effort when having to fine tune the settings.

Other than the addition of TTL and the integrated 2.4 gHz receiver, what advantages do the newer versions offer over the original manual ones? I'm trying to decide if it's worth the extra money for them. (I do own an X1 transmitter for Canon and have a 2.4 gHz receiver for one of my manual units so the trigger wouldn't be an issue. I can always get three additional 2.4 gHz receivers for my older units.)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,833 posts
Gallery: 246 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 2508
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
Oct 21, 2016 12:29 |  #2

If you don't need TTL then I would stick with the older version and I think the 433Hz is more reliable then the new 2.4Ghz


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magicmikey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
967 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Feb 2005
     
Oct 21, 2016 12:43 |  #3

abbadon31 wrote in post #18163021 (external link)
If you don't need TTL then I would stick with the older version and I think the 433Hz is more reliable then the new 2.4Ghz

Thanks, Shom!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
8,960 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 1013
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Oct 21, 2016 17:57 as a reply to  @ magicmikey's post |  #4

And if you really want to save some money, PM me.
I have 4 of the original version that I'm willing to sell.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
That's my line!
Avatar
8,159 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 1557
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Oct 21, 2016 18:09 |  #5

dmward wrote in post #18163320 (external link)
And if you really want to save some money, PM me.
I have 4 of the original version that I'm willing to sell.

Here I am avoiding the marketplace and you post this here!

Do you take anonymous internet credit?


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ptcanon3ti
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,587 posts
Gallery: 311 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 3153
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Gloucester Co. NJ
     
Oct 21, 2016 18:12 |  #6

dmward wrote in post #18163320 (external link)
And if you really want to save some money, PM me.
I have 4 of the original version that I'm willing to sell.

Hey Dave. What are you going to replace them with?


Paul
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/petshots/ (external link)
Body - Nikon D750
Lenses - Nikon 20 f1.8 / Nikon 16-35 f4 / Sigma 105 OS Macro / Sigma 24-105 f4 Art / Tamron 70-200 2.8 Di VC / Sigma 150-600 "S"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nixland
Senior Member
474 posts
Likes: 155
Joined Apr 2009
     
Oct 21, 2016 18:44 |  #7

magicmikey wrote in post #18163014 (external link)
I have four of the Flashpoint Streaklight 360 units (same as the Godox AD360.) I'd like to add two more units so I have backups but I'm torn between getting the original manual units which are cheaper or the newer versions with TTL. I'm not sure I would use the TTL function that much. I have been using Canon cameras for years and have owned a 430 EX and now a 600 EX-RT and I find Canon's E-TTL system to be more finicky than I like. I wouldn't photograph an event with the speedlite in manual mode but, for off-camera studio lighting, I'm not sure it would save me much effort when having to fine tune the settings.

Other than the addition of TTL and the integrated 2.4 gHz receiver, what advantages do the newer versions offer over the original manual ones? I'm trying to decide if it's worth the extra money for them. (I do own an X1 transmitter for Canon and have a 2.4 gHz receiver for one of my manual units so the trigger wouldn't be an issue. I can always get three additional 2.4 gHz receivers for my older units.)

If you often use HSS, the AD360ii will switch automatically to hss when your ss is above max sync speed. (using X1 trigger)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hbomb69
Senior Member
Avatar
255 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Lancashire, UK
     
Oct 22, 2016 06:47 |  #8

I changed to the MK2 because of the HSS Thermal limit, the MK2 is 30 shots at full power compared to 10 on the MK1, as a Wedding Photographer this speeds up my workflow rather than using ND filters.
Also the new XT32c is brilliant, totally reliable...:)


CANON 5D MKIII x 2 / CANON 50D / CANON 550D
http://www.michaelhard​castle.co.uk (external link)
Facebook.com/michaelha​rdcastlephotography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
8,960 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 1013
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Oct 22, 2016 08:24 |  #9

ptcanon3ti wrote in post #18163330 (external link)
Hey Dave. What are you going to replace them with?

I have 4 600s with H600 heads.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DigitalEd
Member
36 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 14
Joined Dec 2015
     
Sep 25, 2017 22:32 |  #10

I have two manual 360s and just now getting HSS to work I see that the older 360s i have will only go down to 1/8 power in HSS i am told the newer ones will go all the way down in HSS. This might be a reason to go with a newer one.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dpe
Member
209 posts
Likes: 66
Joined Jan 2017
Location: Wareham
     
Sep 26, 2017 04:30 |  #11

magicmikey wrote in post #18163014 (external link)
I have four of the Flashpoint Streaklight 360 units (same as the Godox AD360.) I'd like to add two more units so I have backups but I'm torn between getting the original manual units which are cheaper or the newer versions with TTL. I'm not sure I would use the TTL function that much. I have been using Canon cameras for years and have owned a 430 EX and now a 600 EX-RT and I find Canon's E-TTL system to be more finicky than I like. I wouldn't photograph an event with the speedlite in manual mode but, for off-camera studio lighting, I'm not sure it would save me much effort when having to fine tune the settings.

Other than the addition of TTL and the integrated 2.4 gHz receiver, what advantages do the newer versions offer over the original manual ones? I'm trying to decide if it's worth the extra money for them. (I do own an X1 transmitter for Canon and have a 2.4 gHz receiver for one of my manual units so the trigger wouldn't be an issue. I can always get three additional 2.4 gHz receivers for my older units.)


Definitely worth the extra money, overheat protection cuts in later, part of the X1 series, latest is an improvement working manual as well as TTL, 2.4GHz works perfectly why would you want to buy into older generation equipment?

Mike


UK based photographer specialising in equestrian but also doing things like Prom Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmmfotografie
hanging up-side-down in a cave
2,114 posts
Likes: 491
Joined Jul 2013
Location: Helsinki Airport
     
Sep 26, 2017 05:29 |  #12

DigitalEd wrote in post #18460526 (external link)
I have two manual 360s and just now getting HSS to work I see that the older 360s i have will only go down to 1/8 power in HSS i am told the newer ones will go all the way down in HSS. This might be a reason to go with a newer one.

HSS setting is used to reduce the ambient light in the picture by reducing the exposure to it. Then you need also more flashlight to compensate so only going down to 1/8 defendable.

If you don't totally depend on TTL then then going for newer is not needed.

Also you can easily pre-sync, faster than x-sync, you can get the XTR16 receivers for cheap and use the X series triggers by Godox.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jlafferty
Member
172 posts
Likes: 62
Joined Feb 2017
Location: NYC
     
Sep 26, 2017 13:16 |  #13

We all have our own experiences and needs, and in both instances, I've found the 360 II to be worth every extra penny paid even though I have yet to use the TTL feature. I'm often ND'ing the Manual version to get below 1/8th power. I love the fact that the TTL models jump to HSS intelligently. The extended shooting before thermal protect, the faster recycle times in HSS due to being able to go lower than 1/8th, all welcome.

The only gripe I have with the TTL units? There's no beep confirm on power changes from the X1 transmitter :(

mmmfotografie wrote in post #18460637 (external link)
HSS setting is used to reduce the ambient light in the picture by reducing the exposure to it. Then you need also more flashlight to compensate so only going down to 1/8 defendable.

If you don't totally depend on TTL then then going for newer is not needed.

Also you can easily pre-sync, faster than x-sync, you can get the XTR16 receivers for cheap and use the X series triggers by Godox.


Current Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmmfotografie
hanging up-side-down in a cave
2,114 posts
Likes: 491
Joined Jul 2013
Location: Helsinki Airport
Post edited 7 months ago by mmmfotografie.
     
Sep 26, 2017 14:47 as a reply to  @ jlafferty's post |  #14

My text sandwiches yours.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
magicmikey
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
967 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Feb 2005
     
Sep 26, 2017 22:48 |  #15

I ended up buying a pair of the AD360II (FlashPoint version) in November when Adorama did the super low price on them. (They were only $349.95 when they went on sale so the price difference was minimal.) I have only used the TTL a handful of times but it is convenient to have the receiver built-in. When I'm going for a quick setup, I use the TTL versions. When I'm doing my studio setup, I usually use the manual ones, although I've had a couple of five light setups where I used both together.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

12,555 views & 4 likes for this thread
Godox AD360II vs AD360
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mason.snipes
326 guests, 295 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.