Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation 
Thread started 06 Dec 2016 (Tuesday) 21:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Is it over for Photomatix?

 
nqjudo
Goldmember
Avatar
2,829 posts
Likes: 797
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Canada
     
Aug 09, 2017 03:42 |  #16

icor1031 wrote in post #18422877 (external link)
Why does it need to support specific cameras?


Photomatix is a 3rd party offering so without proprietary access to the RAW file, conversion/support has to be written into the program after a new RAW release (if they are written in at all). It is the same with Adobe. A new camera typically isn't supported upon release by Camera RAW. It is added post-release.

From the Photomatix site:

'If your camera model is recent, you may have to wait for a future version of Photomatix before it supports RAW files from your new camera.

The best way to check whether RAW files from your camera are supported is to try Photomatix with your RAW files. There is also a list of camera models supported by Photomatix Pro and Essentials, but it isn't exhaustive, which means that the latest Photomatix version may still support RAW files from your camera even if it is not on this list.'


No photographer is as good as the simplest camera. - Edward Steichen.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stiga
Goldmember
Avatar
3,346 posts
Gallery: 716 photos
Likes: 1267
Joined Dec 2015
Location: Nr Perth, Scotland
     
Aug 09, 2017 04:05 |  #17

icor1031 wrote in post #18422877 (external link)
Why does it need to support specific cameras?

It doesn't. But if the manufacturer brings out a new RAW format, Photomatix will have to bring out and upsate.


Martin
I'm not a gear guy but I have a tons of software :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ascenta
Senior Member
Avatar
483 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 187
Joined Sep 2005
Post edited 9 months ago by Ascenta.
     
Aug 09, 2017 09:54 |  #18

Photoshop HDR function doesn't do it for me. I'm thinking about buying this; my 5D4 is supported. Could be worth the $99?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
THREAD ­ STARTER
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,044 posts
Likes: 119
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Aug 10, 2017 07:23 |  #19

Ascenta wrote in post #18423068 (external link)
Photoshop HDR function doesn't do it for me. I'm thinking about buying this; my 5D4 is supported. Could be worth the $99?

In CC, the newer / better panorama is excellent. Miles above the app I used for years (PTGui). However, I believe you are correct about the PS HDR feature. It's really lacking, and IMHO, complete crap. They got a long way to go on that one. So yea, if you do a lot of HDR it's worth the investment. If you're shooting multiple exposures, another alternative is luminosity masking. There are many good apps on the market now that make it easy to do.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
5,503 posts
Likes: 461
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Aug 10, 2017 18:46 |  #20

As mentioned elsewhere in this forum a little while ago, the ability to merge to HDR in PS and then use the Camera Raw filter to tone map has been disabled in the most recent CC versions of PS. I have no idea why. If you want to use PS for HDR, you are probably better off shooting your source images in raw and using the ACR interface to merge the raws to a HDR DNG. Then you can use the ACR interface to tone map and avoid the Merge to HDR Pro interface altogether.

Photomatix 6 has a lot of options, a lot of control and can produce excellent results - however, it can easily produce horrible results. Download the trial and see if it suits your needs.

kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,175 views & 4 likes for this thread
Is it over for Photomatix?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos HDR Creation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ChrisS76a
743 guests, 404 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.