Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Glamour & Nude Talk
Thread started 21 Apr 2017 (Friday) 23:31
Prev/next

I m not able to post in the actual forum yet

 
Blackey ­ Cole
Senior Member
480 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Alamogordo New Mexico
Apr 21, 2017 23:31 |  #1

Ok I was looking thru the posts in the g&n forum and some of the images just about break every rule in photography. I'm been shooting since the 70s then decided to take the nyip photography course last year.

It states for a photo to be good it should follow some if not all of the rules

1) tell a story
2) the subject should be easily ided
3) remove all distractions if possible

I think some have been doing it so long they have forgotten this


Yeah you have other rules like the rule of thirds but the three I listed need to be followed first.


Click Here and Join the POTN flickr Group Today!external link

Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
flowrider
Goldmember
flowrider's Avatar
Joined Dec 2009
604
Apr 21, 2017 23:46 |  #2

Rules are made to be broken if done on purpose. Some like it, some don't.


~Steve~
~ My Website-stevelowephoto.com (external link) ~ Facebook (external link)
Feedback Feedback Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Bassat's Avatar
6,593 posts
Joined Oct 2015
Bourbon, Indiana - USA
Apr 22, 2017 04:07 |  #3

Blackey Cole wrote in post #18334491 (external link)
Ok I was looking thru the posts in the g&n forum and some of the images just about break every rule in photography. I'm been shooting since the 70s then decided to take the nyip photography course last year.

It states for a photo to be good it should follow some if not all of the rules

1) tell a story
2) the subject should be easily ided
3) remove all distractions if possible

I think some have been doing it so long they have forgotten this


Yeah you have other rules like the rule of thirds but the three I listed need to be followed first.

I can't figure out whether you are arrogant, ignorant, joking, or some combination of the three.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
DaviSto
... sorry. I got carried away!
DaviSto's Avatar
Joined Nov 2016
Abuja Nigeria
Apr 22, 2017 04:42 |  #4

Blackey Cole wrote in post #18334491 (external link)
Ok I was looking thru the posts in the g&n forum and some of the images just about break every rule in photography. I'm been shooting since the 70s then decided to take the nyip photography course last year.

It states for a photo to be good it should follow some if not all of the rules

1) tell a story
2) the subject should be easily ided
3) remove all distractions if possible

I think some have been doing it so long they have forgotten this


Yeah you have other rules like the rule of thirds but the three I listed need to be followed first.

Part of what you are saying seems to amount to ... 'When I browse the G&N section of POTN, I occasionally come across posted images that seem to me to have little artistic or technical merit. Some of them seem, strangely, even to have attracted quite a number of 'likes'' ... On that point, I'd just say 'go figure'. It comes with the territory, so to speak.

There is plenty of material in that area that has technical and/or artistic merit, however. Some of it won't be to everybody's personal taste and, if that's the case for you, just don't go there.

On the issue of rules: I think this subject has probably been discussed ad nauseum elsewhere on the forum. I'd just say, almost everywhere I see the rules laid down, I also see a qualification that says that they should really be looked at as guides or suggestions. I think they are helpful enough as a starting point, especially for people learning photography, but you have to use your eyes and your imagination to make really good images.

Lastly, it could maybe be inferred that you are suggesting POTN would benefit from community rules about the quality of what people can post. There are rules already about the nature of what can be posted and where. That's enough. There's a lot that can be learned from looking at bad photographs. I rather enjoy it and it helps me see the weaknesses in some of my own stuff and how it might be improved. And POTN is meant to be open ... and welcoming ... to all standards of photographer and works well and stays alive partly because of that. Finally, finally, who would be the quality police?


Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
Spiderwoman
OhLook's Avatar
15,189 posts
Gallery: 64 photos
Joined Dec 2012
California: SF Bay Area
Apr 22, 2017 10:27 |  #5

Blackey Cole wrote in post #18334491 (external link)
It states for a photo to be good it should follow some if not all of the rules

1) tell a story
2) the subject should be easily ided
3) remove all distractions if possible

Those are someone's rules but not everyone's rules. Rather than strain the server with an essay about all three, I'll just comment on Rule #1. Stories are, almost invariably, narratives that unfold in time. Photos show one moment in time, with a few exceptions such as some long exposures, which are rare or absent in G&N. Occasionally a still photo can imply a story, as a one-panel cartoon with no caption does, but few images in G&N are of this type. If you want to tell a story, don't take a picture. Write a story.

When I view an image, I don't expect to "hear" a story. I hope to see things like good composition and use of color–in other words, the visuals. If the image features a person, there are additional criteria. You don't judge images of landscapes by the presence or absence of storytelling, do you? Then why images of women?


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS FOR YOU: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.) | IMAGE EDITING OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
joedlh's Avatar
Joined Dec 2007
Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
Post has been edited 7 months ago by joedlh.
Apr 22, 2017 11:12 |  #6

OhLook wrote in post #18334739 (external link)
Stories are, almost invariably, narratives that unfold in time. Photos show one moment in time, with a few exceptions such as some long exposures, which are rare or absent in G&N. Occasionally a still photo can imply a story, as a one-panel cartoon with no caption does, but few images in G&N are of this type. If you want to tell a story, don't take a picture. Write a story.

You may be taking too literally "telling a story". I'm a writer as well as a photographer. I understand what you say about a narrative. However, telling a story in a photograph is a figure of speech. It means that it draws in the viewer more deeply than if you simply recorded patterns of color and light or dark. It implies an emotional engagement.

But back to the theme of the thread. I have heard it said in the arts (and also in writing) that one should be aware of "the rules" so that one knows when they can be broken. Slavishly following them is uninteresting. The only true rule is the goal of taking a photograph that engages the viewer's focused attention. In G/N, the subject alone certainly has the potential for that.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​texternal link
Editing ok

LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
Spiderwoman
OhLook's Avatar
15,189 posts
Gallery: 64 photos
Joined Dec 2012
California: SF Bay Area
Apr 22, 2017 11:45 |  #7

joedlh wrote in post #18334785 (external link)
You may be taking too literally "telling a story". I'm a writer as well as a photographer.

Me too. Hi!

I understand what you say about a narrative. However, telling a story in a photograph is a figure of speech. It means that it draws in the viewer more deeply than if you simply recorded patterns of color and light or dark. It implies an emotional engagement.

This definition is too broad to be much help in a rulebook. Viewers' tastes and sensibilities differ, so that a given photo will engage some and not others. Even the engaged viewers may be engaged for diverse reasons. They'll make up their own "stories." An abstraction, mere shapes and colors, will engage people who appreciate abstractions. I'd rather say that a good photo draws people in, recognizing that there are various kinds of "good" and that nothing draws everyone in.

I have heard it said in the arts (and also in writing) that one should be aware of "the rules" so that one knows when they can be broken.

Yes. I think the OP's post raises hackles because it elevates one particular set of three rules, which aren't paramount in all photographers' minds, to the status of "The Rules and Don't You Forget It!"


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS FOR YOU: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.) | IMAGE EDITING OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
AZGeorge
Goldmember
AZGeorge's Avatar
Joined Dec 2010
Southen Arizona
Apr 23, 2017 12:44 |  #8

I think you would get a lot further here if you posted some of your work as examples of photography done right.

You can choose the forum for your posts. Given your long history of shooting and high level of expertise you would certainly quality for early admission to G&N posting but other sorts of shots would make your point,


George
Democracy Dies in Darkness

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Tom Reichner's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
Apr 28, 2017 20:06 |  #9

Blackey Cole wrote in post #18334491 (external link)
2) the subject should be easily ided

I don't understand this rule.

Is the word "ided" your own homemade abbreviation for "identified"? Or does it mean something else? I Googled it, and came up with nothing conclusive, inasmuch as a pertinent definition is concerned.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "peace of mind", NOT "piece of mind".

LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
Spiderwoman
OhLook's Avatar
15,189 posts
Gallery: 64 photos
Joined Dec 2012
California: SF Bay Area
Apr 28, 2017 22:21 |  #10

Tom Reichner wrote in post #18341376 (external link)
Is the word "ided" your own homemade abbreviation for "identified"?

That's how I understand it. IDed or ID'd would have been clearer.

If the subject must be clearly identified for a photo to qualify as good, there are no good abstract photos.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS FOR YOU: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.) | IMAGE EDITING OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pippan
Senior Member
Pippan's Avatar
575 posts
Joined Oct 2015
Darwin, Australia
Apr 28, 2017 23:49 |  #11

Blackey Cole wrote in post #18334491 (external link)
Ok I was looking thru the posts in the g&n forum and some of the images just about break every rule in photography. I'm been shooting since the 70s then decided to take the nyip photography course last year.

It states for a photo to be good it should follow some if not all of the rules

1) tell a story
2) the subject should be easily ided
3) remove all distractions if possible

I think some have been doing it so long they have forgotten this


Yeah you have other rules like the rule of thirds but the three I listed need to be followed first.

I contacted my photo lawyer and she advised me that photo law was recently amended. Photographers can now make whatever photos they want, even if the unidentified subject is a distraction to the story.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Bassat's Avatar
6,593 posts
Joined Oct 2015
Bourbon, Indiana - USA
Apr 29, 2017 01:11 |  #12

Pippan wrote in post #18341517 (external link)
I contacted my photo lawyer and she advised me that photo law was recently amended. Photographers can now make whatever photos they want, even if the unidentified subject is a distraction to the story.

This likely only applies in Australia. OP is from New Mexico, USA. This may or may not be related to the OP's post: peyote grows wild down there.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Tom Reichner's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
Apr 29, 2017 03:11 |  #13

Blackey Cole wrote in post #18334491 (external link)
I'm been shooting since the 70s then decided to take the nyip photography course last year.

It states for a photo to be good it should follow some if not all of the rules

So, let me get this straight:

Despite 40 years of photography experience, you are now relying on a photo course curriculum to tell you what the rules of photography are? . Really?

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "peace of mind", NOT "piece of mind".

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Bassat's Avatar
6,593 posts
Joined Oct 2015
Bourbon, Indiana - USA
Apr 29, 2017 07:10 |  #14

Tom Reichner wrote in post #18341571 (external link)
So, let me get this straight:

Despite 40 years of photography experience, you are now relying on a photo course curriculum to tell you what the rules of photography are? . Really?

.

I saw that, too. Blew me away that this didn't come from a 15-year-old fresh out of a high school photo class.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
Moose408
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2006
San Jose, CA
Apr 30, 2017 12:24 |  #15

I'm not quite sure what the OP's point was, but there is some merit to the observation that many posts in the G&N forum are poor photos. They are bordering on porn, or are something a GWC would take just just because the wanted to hang out with a naked woman. They are more snapshots than anything approaching fine art.

The group threads are the worse examples of this and seem to just be there to objectify some part of the nude body.

I'm all for people who are posting because they critique and to get better and even if they look like snapshots I'm willing to offer suggestions, but many here don't seem to want that critique.


Canon 5DmkII | 24-105mm f/4.0L IS | 24-70mm f/2.8L | 17-40mm f/4L | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS | 50mm f/1.8
Photography Blogexternal link | 500pxexternal link | Model Mayhemexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY

4,286 views & 39 likes for this thread
I m not able to post in the actual forum yet
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Glamour & Nude Talk

Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00137 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.12s
Latest registered member is BradMD96
824 guests, 418 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016