Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk
Thread started 30 Apr 2017 (Sunday) 00:13
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Best short sports lens?

 
Tessa
Playing with fire
Tessa's Avatar
Joined Sep 2008
Estonia
Jun 02, 2017 03:17 |  #16

TooManyShots wrote in post #18349984 (external link)
Here is my take. You either go long and longer. Or wide or wider. I personally find the middle range focal length, like 50mm to 100mm on a crop body not "dramatic" enough to create good shots. If the focal length is not long enough, you don't get the necessary background isolation. When you need to show more of the background, the ambient and the crowd, the middle focal length does not have the necessary DOF.

I generally carry my Sigma 17-50 and Nikon AF D 80-200 when I shoot cycling races.

This. I shoot motorsports and my most used combo of lenses on a pair of 7D is 10-22 and 70-200.


Gallery (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
ScooterShooter
Member
Joined Feb 2015
Akron, Ohio
Jun 14, 2017 12:05 |  #17

Patrick_E wrote in post #18342320 (external link)
85, 1.8 - If on FF

85 for net work, and 70-200/2.8 for further reach.


Nikon D5300, D610 | Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G, AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED, AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED, AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED |

LOG IN TO REPLY
D ­ Jacobs
Member
33 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Jun 18, 2017 04:46 as a reply to post 18342450 |  #18

I agree with the 70-200.


5D Mark II / 7D / 70-200mm f/2.8L IS / 24-105mm f/4L / 17-40mm f/4L / 600 EX-RT / Need to stop before more things are listed here...

LOG IN TO REPLY
Zivnuska
Goldmember
Zivnuska's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Wichita, Kansas
Jul 09, 2017 18:05 |  #19

JeffreyG wrote in post #18365142 (external link)
On a FF body, a 70-200 will give you the same range that a hypothetical 44-125 zoom would give on your 1.6X body. You can probably see why a FF body and a 70-200 is so popular for sports from that.


Yes. FF and 70-200 f/2.8L IS II. Great for volleyball, basketball, portraits, and lots of other stuff.


www.zivnuska.zenfolio.​com/blog = My Blog
Gear List
www.zivnuska.zenfolio.​comexternal link

"It's not tight until you see the color of the irides."

LOG IN TO REPLY

4,906 views & 2 likes for this thread
Best short sports lens?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00081 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is quokka
956 guests, 439 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016