Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Macro
Thread started 14 Jul 2017 (Friday) 23:27
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

How is the lighting on this shot?

 
Archibald
You must be quackers!
Archibald's Avatar
Joined May 2008
Calgary
Jul 14, 2017 23:27 |  #1

I have been striving for soft even lighting. Now I'm wondering if it is too flat. Should there be more pop in this photo? More directionality? Comments appreciated.

Hoverfly washing its hands. Diffused flash.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Hasselblad 500 C/M with 80mm/2.8 Zeiss Planar; Pentax Spotmatic F with 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 135/3.5; Canon digital gear
C&C always welcome.
Picture editing OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
LordV
Macro Photo-Lord of the Year 2006
LordV's Avatar
58,648 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Joined Oct 2005
Worthing UK
Jul 15, 2017 01:14 |  #2

Light looks good to me but it is a matter of personal preference.

Brian V.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lordv/ (external link)
http://www.lordv.smugm​ug.com/ (external link)
Macro Hints and tips
Canon 600D, 40D, 5D mk2, 7D, Tamron 90mm macro, Sigma 105mm OS, Canon MPE-65,18-55 kit lens X2, canon 200mm F2.8 L, Tamron 28-70mm xrdi, Other assorted bits

LOG IN TO REPLY
Temma
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2009
Rocky River, Ohio
Jul 15, 2017 07:43 |  #3

Archibald wrote in post #18402402 (external link)
I have been striving for soft even lighting. Now I'm wondering if it is too flat. Should there be more pop in this photo? More directionality? Comments appreciated.

Hoverfly washing its hands. Diffused flash.

thumbnailHosted photo: posted by Archibald in
./showthread.php?p=184​02402&i=i10261401
forum: Macro

It looks fine to me, plenty of detail, nothing washed out, no harsh shadows.

You're not going to do much better except in a computer graphic.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Lester Wareham's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
Hampshire, UK
Post has been edited 12 days ago by Lester Wareham.
Jul 15, 2017 09:41 |  #4

For me perhaps a bit more contrast but it is not a big deal. You could perhaps add in post with the contrast slider, easier to add than take away.

Specular highlights are well controlled though. I worry less about that than some though, because if you photograph the subject in sunlight you often get significant specular highlights, I see them as naturalistic.


My Photography Home Page (external link) RSS Feed (external link)
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV

LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Archibald's Avatar
Joined May 2008
Calgary
Jul 15, 2017 09:59 |  #5

Thanks for the comments. It is sometimes not easy to judge a photo if it is your own, and lighting is hard to assess if it comes from your own creation. Hence the request for opinions.

Here on POTN we have a reluctance to comment on photos, and I understand the reason. But my opinion is that C&C is valuable and helps the makers to improve.


Hasselblad 500 C/M with 80mm/2.8 Zeiss Planar; Pentax Spotmatic F with 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 135/3.5; Canon digital gear
C&C always welcome.
Picture editing OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Archibald's Avatar
Joined May 2008
Calgary
Jul 15, 2017 14:56 |  #6

Redid the processing a bit. Is it better, the same, or worse?

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Hasselblad 500 C/M with 80mm/2.8 Zeiss Planar; Pentax Spotmatic F with 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 135/3.5; Canon digital gear
C&C always welcome.
Picture editing OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Archibald's Avatar
Joined May 2008
Calgary
Jul 16, 2017 16:20 |  #7

OK, I realize this forum is not for discussing and learning...


Hasselblad 500 C/M with 80mm/2.8 Zeiss Planar; Pentax Spotmatic F with 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 135/3.5; Canon digital gear
C&C always welcome.
Picture editing OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris.R
Senior Member
966 posts
Joined Jul 2016
Jul 16, 2017 18:35 as a reply to Archibald's post |  #8

For me the lighting's fine, in both. A little more unevenness left/right is often more interesting, but then highlights demand a wide dynamic range on the sensor.
It's personal, but I always like to see detail in more of the animal, dof in other words, or stacking ( with a load of retouching, for a washing one of these)
Well done though - they never sit still for me!




LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Talley's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Houston
Jul 16, 2017 19:45 |  #9

Looks fine but I'm not a huge macro person. Bokeh looks good.


5D4 |12mm 2.8 FE | 16-35L F4 IS | Σ 24-70A | Σ 24A | Σ 35A | Σ 50A | Σ 85A | 200 F2 IS | 1.4xIII
X-T20 | 18/2 | 35/1.4 | 56/1.2 | 18-135
My Gear Archive

LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Archibald's Avatar
Joined May 2008
Calgary
Jul 16, 2017 20:20 |  #10

Thanks for the comments, guys.

The first and second images look very similar. Yet the first didn't look right to me. I didn't know what it was exactly, I thought maybe the flat lighting.

But now I think it was the color balance. The first shot started to look quite yellow to me. So I made an adjustment. In the second, I lowered the temp from about 6600 to 5700K. It is not actually very obvious because of the colors in the shot.

I selected 5700K because a quicky test of the flash/diffuser combo used gave about 5700K light.

So I thought I'd ask here to see if I'm just imagining things or not. It's maybe not fair, because the difference is subtle. A change of 1000K is subtle?? Well, it seems that way in this case.

Chris, interesting point about L-R gradation.


Hasselblad 500 C/M with 80mm/2.8 Zeiss Planar; Pentax Spotmatic F with 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 135/3.5; Canon digital gear
C&C always welcome.
Picture editing OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Talley's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Houston
Jul 16, 2017 23:42 |  #11

darker background perhaps


5D4 |12mm 2.8 FE | 16-35L F4 IS | Σ 24-70A | Σ 24A | Σ 35A | Σ 50A | Σ 85A | 200 F2 IS | 1.4xIII
X-T20 | 18/2 | 35/1.4 | 56/1.2 | 18-135
My Gear Archive

LOG IN TO REPLY
rosh4u
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2017
Surat, India
Jul 16, 2017 23:59 |  #12

As detailing the work is done in great quantity, lights in this picture seems good to me. I didn't found the images to be in less exposure of lights.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Archibald
THREAD ­ STARTER
You must be quackers!
Archibald's Avatar
Joined May 2008
Calgary
Jul 17, 2017 01:30 |  #13

Thanks!


Hasselblad 500 C/M with 80mm/2.8 Zeiss Planar; Pentax Spotmatic F with 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 135/3.5; Canon digital gear
C&C always welcome.
Picture editing OK

LOG IN TO REPLY
davholla
Senior Member
Joined Nov 2014
Jul 17, 2017 02:01 |  #14

They both look fine to me.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris.R
Senior Member
966 posts
Joined Jul 2016
Post has been edited 10 days ago by Chris.R.
Jul 17, 2017 04:45 |  #15

It's niggling that this isn't as sharp as it should be. I looked at the 1280 pixel version. With that camera, lens, flash, f/11 - why not? Is anything near to pixel-sharp on the original? I would probably show best in the leaf hairs in front of the fly, I think.

http://photography-on-the.net ...c8eb08276af6d_86538​6.duck




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

531 views & 8 likes for this thread
How is the lighting on this shot?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Macro


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00088 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is MilltownDan
782 guests, 364 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016