Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 16 Mar 2006 (Thursday) 21:34
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Bird lens

 
Diminished29
Senior Member
Diminished29's Avatar
620 posts

Joined Jan 2006

Bridgewater, VA
MORE INFO

Ok, through some research and what not I have a question for all you bird shooters out there.

Does this math work out pretty well as far as focal length is concerned on birds:

*For every 10-20ft 100mm of focal length is needed depending on size to fill the frame*

Size for 10ft being small birds such as sparrows and redpolls and 20ft being for larger birds such as blue herons

So here goes:

I'm seeing a redpoll at about 40ft away, so I'm gonna need roughly 400mm to fill the frame with it?

I understand one can "crop" at 100% but, I'm wanting QUALITY so I'm wondering if my math is correct?

Mar 16, 2006 21:34

Chad

Canon 30D
| 50mm f/1.8
| 18-55mm EF-S IS II | Manfrotto Video/Photo Tripod
external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
PacAce's Avatar
26,804 posts

Joined Feb 2003

ABE, PA USA
MORE INFO

I have birds out in my backyard, like house finches, goldfinches, etc, that are just close to or closer than 40ft from my back door where I have my camera and I can't get them to fill my frame with my 100-400 set to 400. Maybe if they were half the distance away they might. AAMOF, that's one of the reasons I moved one of the goldfinch feeders to within 15 to 20 ft. of my back door. :)

Mar 16, 2006 21:42

...Leo

LOG IN TO REPLY
Diminished29
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Diminished29's Avatar
620 posts

Joined Jan 2006

Bridgewater, VA
MORE INFO

So, it sounds like from your estimation that I'd need 100mm for every 5ft to get a small bird to fill the viewfinder. Wow! Sigmonster here I come...guess I'll need some teleconverters too. Ok, just kidding, but wow, I thought 10ft per 100mm for a small bird to fill the frame was pretty bad, but 5ft!

I guess when I think about it though, to get what I'm trying to go for 10ft per 100mm may be alright, since it seems most people compose a branch or tree limb or something in the picture along with the smaller bird to give it character and show it in a more natural setting.

Again, I'm just one who likes to do my homework before spending lots of money. Looking to move on from the A610 in several months, but I'd like to have decent cost effective glass to go with my DSLR when I do start shooting with it.

Mar 16, 2006 23:11 as a reply to PacAce's post 1 hour earlier.

Chad

Canon 30D
| 50mm f/1.8
| 18-55mm EF-S IS II | Manfrotto Video/Photo Tripod
external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Diminished29
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Diminished29's Avatar
620 posts

Joined Jan 2006

Bridgewater, VA
MORE INFO

This picture right here, is nothing special, but I took it the other day when I was testing calculations and whatnot.

Here is a redpoll and a sparrow at about 12ft. Its an 80% crop. With some USM at 75 sharpening and some saturation in Paintshop.

It was shot with my A610 at 29mm. So, what would that be the equal to on say a 300D or 20D?


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://i42.photobucket​.com ...Nature/sparrowredpo​ll.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO
Mar 16, 2006 23:34 as a reply to Diminished29's post 22 minutes earlier.

Chad

Canon 30D
| 50mm f/1.8
| 18-55mm EF-S IS II | Manfrotto Video/Photo Tripod
external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
PacAce's Avatar
26,804 posts

Joined Feb 2003

ABE, PA USA
MORE INFO

Diminished29 wrote:
This picture right here, is nothing special, but I took it the other day when I was testing calculations and whatnot.

Here is a redpoll and a sparrow at about 12ft. Its an 80% crop. With some USM at 75 sharpening and some saturation in Paintshop.

It was shot with my A610 at 29mm. So, what would that be the equal to on say a 300D or 20D?


[http://i42.photobucket​.com ...Nature/sparrowredpo​ll.jpgexternal link[/]

The lens on the A610 on the long end is equivalent to 224mm on the 300D and 20D.

BTW, the bird on the left is a house finch. :)

Mar 17, 2006 09:58 as a reply to Diminished29's post 10 hours earlier.

...Leo

LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
In2Photos's Avatar
19,808 posts

Joined Dec 2005

Near Charlotte, NC.
MORE INFO

Try it out. Take a can of soda, roughly a little bigger than a small bird and set up a 100mm lens. Move the can until it fills the frame and record the length from which you placed the can. Then report back to us with your findings.:D Actually, I might try this at home today and see how it goes, now that I got my new tripod.

Mar 17, 2006 10:11 as a reply to PacAce's post 13 minutes earlier.

Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
gasrocks's Avatar
13,431 posts

Joined Mar 2005

Portage, Wisconsin USA
MORE INFO

I teach a class on Wildbird Photography. Just to show my students I took a pix of a chickadee at 55 feet away w/ 1800mm (equiv.) and the bird fills about 1/3 the frame. Good enough to crop though. Upon further review..... more like 1/4 or 1/5th of the frame.

Mar 17, 2006 12:54

GEAR LIST
_______________

LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
In2Photos's Avatar
19,808 posts

Joined Dec 2005

Near Charlotte, NC.
MORE INFO

In2Photos wrote:
Try it out. Take a can of soda, roughly a little bigger than a small bird and set up a 100mm lens. Move the can until it fills the frame and record the length from which you placed the can. Then report back to us with your findings.:D Actually, I might try this at home today and see how it goes, now that I got my new tripod.

OK, tried it out at lunch today. Here are the results. Only resized. Camera was on a tripod shooting down at an angle so the distance is really just horizontal distance, no vertical distance taken into consideration.

5 feet

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

10 feet
HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
Mar 17, 2006 12:56 as a reply to In2Photos's post 2 hours earlier.

Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
In2Photos's Avatar
19,808 posts

Joined Dec 2005

Near Charlotte, NC.
MORE INFO

15 feet

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

20 feet
HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
Mar 17, 2006 12:57 as a reply to In2Photos's post 58 seconds earlier.

Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
In2Photos's Avatar
19,808 posts

Joined Dec 2005

Near Charlotte, NC.
MORE INFO

Size of bottle.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
Mar 17, 2006 12:58 as a reply to In2Photos's post 50 seconds earlier.

Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
42,226 posts
GALLERY: 47 photos

Joined Apr 2003

Rhode Island USA
MORE INFO

Mike,. just to clarify,. you used a 100mm?
On a 1.6.. so were talking 160mm feild of view?

Mar 17, 2006 13:07

GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
In2Photos's Avatar
19,808 posts

Joined Dec 2005

Near Charlotte, NC.
MORE INFO

CyberDyneSystems wrote:
Mike,. just to clarify,. you used a 100mm?
On a 1.6.. so were talking 160mm feild of view?

Correct, sorry, thought I read somewhere that the OP was looking at a 1.6x camera.:o

Mar 17, 2006 13:12 as a reply to CyberDyneSystems's post 4 minutes earlier.

Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
42,226 posts
GALLERY: 47 photos

Joined Apr 2003

Rhode Island USA
MORE INFO

I think your right!.. I wasn't challenging your findings at all!

I just wanted to be sure we were all on the same page :)

To me the results show 5 feet per 100mm on a 1.6 crop body.
Now.. whos going to check a 300mm or longer to see if the the math holds up?

Mar 17, 2006 13:19

GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
In2Photos
Cream of the Crop
In2Photos's Avatar
19,808 posts

Joined Dec 2005

Near Charlotte, NC.
MORE INFO

CyberDyneSystems wrote:
I think your right!.. I wasn't challenging your findings at all!

I just wanted to be sure we were all on the same page :)

To me the results show 5 feet per 100mm on a 1.6 crop body.
Now.. whos going to check a 300mm or longer to see if the the math holds up?

No, no, you are fine. And I wish I had a 300 mm to test. Then maybe I wouldn't be cropping so much with my bird photography.:( Oh well, one thing at a time.

Mar 17, 2006 13:21 as a reply to CyberDyneSystems's post 2 minutes earlier.

Mike, The Keeper of the Archive

Current Gear and Feedback| My Pbase Galleryexternal link | mdsportsphoto.comexternal linkhttp://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=835433

LOG IN TO REPLY
cfcRebel
Cream of the Crop
cfcRebel's Avatar
10,252 posts

Joined Feb 2005

Austin, TX
MORE INFO

Ah, that reminds me i need to refill my Men's Daily vitamin. About to run out.:D

Mar 17, 2006 13:27

Fee

Canon | SIGMA | TAMRON | Kenko | Amvona

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

10,181 views & 0 likes for this thread
Bird lens
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00142 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is unsu
612 guests, 636 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015