Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner
Thread started 15 Aug 2017 (Tuesday) 21:20
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

What's wrong with this photo?

 
mikeivan
Goldmember
mikeivan's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
houston
Aug 15, 2017 21:20 |  #1

I never post in this thread. I get enough criticism at home. However, I have this photo that I really like, but it doesn't look good in a print. So, what's the problem?

These are Black Skimmers, Oso Bay, in Corpus Christi, with Texas A & M CC campus in the background.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
Any suggestions, ideas are welcome. Maybe it just won't work. Thanks.

MIKEIVAN

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
PhotosGuy
Moderator
PhotosGuy's Avatar
74,625 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Feb 2004
Middle of Michigan
Aug 15, 2017 21:58 |  #2

I like it. What's wrong with the print?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1280 pixels on any side.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Goldmember
Dan Marchant's Avatar
Joined Oct 2011
Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
Aug 15, 2017 23:51 |  #3

As above, without knowing what you don't like about the print it is hard to offer advise.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

LOG IN TO REPLY
peeaanuut
Goldmember
peeaanuut's Avatar
Joined Feb 2011
Aug 16, 2017 00:15 |  #4

Could it be the size you are trying to print? Maybe its too large for the available resolution?


Stuff
http://joetakesphotos.​com/external link : | : https://www.facebook.c​om/JKlingPhotosexternal link : | : https://twitter.com/jk​lingphotosexternal link
airbutchie - Joe was definitely right about adding contrast...
:)

LOG IN TO REPLY
bob_r
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2006
Cordova, TN
Aug 16, 2017 00:17 |  #5

If you look at your histogram, everything is mid-tones. The wings of the birds should be black so there should be at least a small spike near the left side of your histogram, but there is not.
Part of the birds and the buildings are white, so your histogram should show a full range, but it doesn't. I used levels in Photoshop and used the eyedroppers to click on black, white and mid-tones (I used what I assume is a road just above the lake for mid-tones). This was the result. I didn't make any other changes.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
Sigma 150 macro, 1.4X, 2X, Quantaray 2X, Kenko closeup tubes, Yongnuo YN685(3), Yongnuo YN-622C-TX. Lots of studio stuff.
** Image Editing OK **

LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeivan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
mikeivan's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
houston
Aug 16, 2017 08:09 |  #6

Thanks to all. One of my habits, too much shadow boost and hilite mute. That helps. Are the buildings a big distraction?


MIKEIVAN

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Alveric's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Canada
Post has been edited 1 month ago by Alveric.
Aug 16, 2017 14:14 |  #7

mikeivan wrote in post #18429074 (external link)
Thanks to all. One of my habits, too much shadow boost and hilite mute. That helps. Are the buildings a big distraction?

Short answer: no.

Long answer: the point of using shallow depth of field is to render whatever is not the subject a blurry non-distraction, methinks. Besides, even if they were distracting, you can't lose them without losing two of the birds.

Image is fine as it is.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

563 views & 3 likes for this thread
What's wrong with this photo?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00092 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is steve-cor
850 guests, 345 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016