Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 19 Aug 2017 (Saturday) 21:20
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon 85mm 1.2L ii vs 85mm 1.8

 
James ­ Crockett
Member
James Crockett's Avatar
143 posts
Joined May 2017
Aug 19, 2017 21:20 |  #1

I would like opinions on both of these. Is it that big of a difference between the two far as image quality?? Thanks.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Bassat's Avatar
6,948 posts
Joined Oct 2015
Bourbon, Indiana - USA
Aug 19, 2017 21:22 |  #2

I have the 85 1.8, and I like it. I can't afford the 85L II, so it doesn't matter a whole bunch how good it is.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
hait0622
Member
35 posts
Joined Aug 2017
Aug 20, 2017 00:34 |  #3

I had the 1.8 it was pretty sharp, bit I am trying to get the sigma 85 1.4 art. Since it is weather sealed and great quality pics.




LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
FarmerTed1971's Avatar
Joined Sep 2013
Portland, OR
Aug 20, 2017 02:57 |  #4

The 1.2 is a slower focus and is physically very large. It is a wonderful portrait lens. If you do studio work you cannot go wrong with it. That being said the 1.8 is no slouch, and it's very inexpensive.

You might wait as the rumored 1.4 IS may be just around the corner.


Getting better at this - Fuji Xt-2 - Fuji X-Pro2 - 18-55 - 35 f2 WR - 50-140 - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
CheshireCat
Goldmember
CheshireCat's Avatar
2,303 posts
Joined Oct 2008
*** vanished ***
Post has been edited 5 months ago by CheshireCat.
Aug 20, 2017 03:11 |  #5

James Crockett wrote in post #18432132 (external link)
I would like opinions on both of these. Is it that big of a difference between the two far as image quality?? Thanks.

Yes.
The 85L has a unique rendering character and much better color rendering.
Add also the extra sharpness and contrast, and better correction of chromatic aberrations.

Is this worth the extra price ? It is for me, esepcially if you buy a used one, but others might differ.


1Dx, 5D2 and some lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
umphotography's Avatar
Joined Oct 2007
Gig Harbor, Washington
Aug 20, 2017 10:11 |  #6

I have used both extensively. Got rid of the L and used the 1.8 for years.

The L was to slow for focus and hit/miss at 1.2 .The focus on the 1.8 is fast and keeps up with the demands of a wedding photographer. I cant tell you how many times i missed shots because I had to have that L. Useless for event work in my opinion.

Then along comes Sigma and the 85 Art.....Problem solved. By far the best 85 on the market. Blows everything away right now. The siggy is the 85 to get


Mike
www.umphotography.comexternal link
GEAR LIST
Facebookexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Eric ­ Hopp
Member
Eric Hopp's Avatar
Joined Apr 2017
Campbell, CA, USA
Aug 20, 2017 10:43 |  #7

I do not know anything about the Canon 85 1.2L, aside from the fact that it is a Canon L series lens. However, I do have the 85mm f1.8. It is a wonderful telephoto lens, that is sharp, fast and compact. The 85mm f1.8 has no macro capability--for that, you will have to get the Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro. The 85mm f1.8 is a great lens for short telephoto and field work. And it is cheap, where you can pick up a new 85mm f1.8 for around $370 on Amazon.

I wanted to get a telephoto prime lens for my collection, and I was debating between the Canon 85mm f1.8, and the Canon 100mm f2.8 Macro. I'm pretty much a photojournalism-style shooter, who also loves to shoot flowers. I was first attracted to the 100mm Macro for its macro capabilities in flower shooting. However, when I first picked up the 85mm lens, I was immediately sold on how light and compact the lens was. The Canon 85mm lens is two inches shorter than the Canon 100mm Macro. Add an inexpensive Canon 24mm and 50mm lens, and you have a nice, inexpensive Canon prime setup that is very light, and compact. I went ahead to purchase the Canon 100mm Macro lens for my flower shooting.

You can't go wrong for a small, compact telephoto prime than the 85mm f1.8.


Canon EOS 40D, EOS 30D, EOS 7D | Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM, EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM, EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM, EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM, EF 70-210mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM | Canon Speedlite 430 EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Crockett
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
James Crockett's Avatar
143 posts
Joined May 2017
Aug 20, 2017 11:13 as a reply to umphotography's post |  #8

How's the bokeh on the Sigma 85 art?




LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Bassat's Avatar
6,948 posts
Joined Oct 2015
Bourbon, Indiana - USA
Aug 20, 2017 11:15 |  #9

I have to add that the 85 1.8 is great for sports/action work. Fast enough aperture to keep your shutter speed up, and snap-quick focus that can keep up with basketball and ice-hockey. I've never touched an 85L or 85LII, but I don't think either can focus as quickly as the 85 1.8.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pigpen101
Member
Joined Mar 2017
Aug 20, 2017 11:23 as a reply to Bassat's post |  #10

I have the 100mmL macro and it "doubles" as a portrait lens. Once I got the 85mm 1.8, I never used the macro for portraits again. I cannot say enough about the 85mm. Love it! The color and contrast are great. I have used it w/ extension tubes with great results.




LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Crockett
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
James Crockett's Avatar
143 posts
Joined May 2017
Aug 20, 2017 11:27 as a reply to Pigpen101's post |  #11

I have the 100mm macro L as well. I'm not sure what you mean by "doubles" but the 85 1.8 looks like a nice lens. Thanks!




LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Bassat's Avatar
6,948 posts
Joined Oct 2015
Bourbon, Indiana - USA
Aug 20, 2017 11:28 |  #12

Pigpen101 wrote in post #18432439 (external link)
I have the 100mmL macro and it "doubles" as a portrait lens. Once I got the 85mm 1.8, I never used the macro for portraits again. I cannot say enough about the 85mm. Love it! The color and contrast are great. I have used it w/ extension tubes with great results.

I have the 100mm macro, too. I haven't used it for anything but macro since I acquired the 85 1.8 and 135L.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pigpen101
Member
Joined Mar 2017
Post has been edited 5 months ago by Pigpen101.
Aug 20, 2017 11:32 |  #13

James Crockett wrote in post #18432445 (external link)
I have the 100mm macro L as well. I'm not sure what you mean by "doubles" but the 85 1.8 looks like a nice lens. Thanks!

When I was reading reviews about the macro, one thing mentioned by most people is that it could also be used for taking portraits.

The 85mm has 1,900 reviews averaging 5 stars, and it always seems to be "on sale" @ B&H.


https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com ...tt=canon%2085mm%20f​%2F1.8 (external link)




LOG IN TO REPLY
Pigpen101
Member
Joined Mar 2017
Post has been edited 5 months ago by Pigpen101.
Aug 20, 2017 11:35 |  #14

Bassat wrote in post #18432448 (external link)
I have the 100mm macro, too. I haven't used it for anything but macro since I acquired the 85 1.8 and 135L.

I have heard the 135L called "the best lens Canon makes." (more than once)




LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Crockett
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
James Crockett's Avatar
143 posts
Joined May 2017
Aug 20, 2017 11:40 |  #15

Pigpen101 wrote in post #18432456 (external link)
I have heard the 135L called "the best lens Canon makes." (more than once)

I have the 135L F2 and the sigma 35 art as well. Thanks everybody for the replies.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

4,553 views & 25 likes for this thread
Canon 85mm 1.2L ii vs 85mm 1.8
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00097 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is TheSandValor
947 guests, 489 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017