Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 23 Aug 2017 (Wednesday) 15:56
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Is the Canon 50mm 1.4 good...enough...?

 
ejenner
Goldmember
ejenner's Avatar
Joined Nov 2011
Denver, CO
Oct 12, 2017 23:24 as a reply to post 18471523 |  #61

I would love a 50 f2 IS.

I do like primes, but I have also realized I really don't need anything faster than f2. IDK if it is the subjects I shoot vs distance or what but I use f2 on my 50 and f2 on my 135 (I guess I need the 200 f2 as well). But alas, no bueno on the 50 f2 IS from Canon. I'm going to try the Tamron primes and see if I can get one with good AF.


Edward Jenner
5DIII, 7DII, M6, GX1 II,M11-22, Sig15mm FE,16-35 F4,TS-E 17,Sig 18-250 OS Macro,M18-150,24-105,T45 1.8VC,70-200 f4 IS,70-200 2.8 vII,Sig 85 1.4,100L,135L,400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
artsf
Member
Joined Sep 2015
Post has been edited 2 months ago by artsf.
Oct 13, 2017 01:13 |  #62

ejenner wrote in post #18471589 (external link)
I would love a 50 f2 IS.

I do like primes, but I have also realized I really don't need anything faster than f2. IDK if it is the subjects I shoot vs distance or what but I use f2 on my 50 and f2 on my 135 (I guess I need the 200 f2 as well). But alas, no bueno on the 50 f2 IS from Canon. I'm going to try the Tamron primes and see if I can get one with good AF.

Browsing through flickr and 500px, tamron 45mm photos look head and shoulders above ef 50mm 1.4 for almost same price; bokeh is definately much better but overall rendering is still not close to 50L.




LOG IN TO REPLY
George ­ Zip
Goldmember
George Zip's Avatar
Joined Aug 2015
Oct 13, 2017 05:56 |  #63

Just to totally derail this thread, and not compare apples with apples and not answer the original question... which is usual forum behaviour ..Even though I don't mind the 50 1.4... I think the 40mm 2.8 pancake is a better lens for less money... if 2.8 is fast enough of course. Here is a picture of some dudes bulldog when I was out walking. I sometimes take my camera with the 40mm because it is so light.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



LOG IN TO REPLY
George ­ Zip
Goldmember
George Zip's Avatar
Joined Aug 2015
Oct 13, 2017 05:59 |  #64

mdvaden wrote in post #18471063 (external link)
Like that shot you posted earlier, whatever the resolution.

Honestly, if all I had was the 50mm 1.4 I had 6 years ago was the only lens in my bag, I'm certain I could get plenty of good shots. And it's worth adding, that I've gotten some crappy shots from my best lenses too. I'd rather have my better lenses, but I wouldn't be ashamed to shoot with a 50mm 1.4 either.

This is from around 2012 when I started learning, but I still enjoy the photo. Canon 50mm 1. 4 @ f/1.6 - ISO 125 and 1/2000 sec
thumbnailHosted photo: posted by mdvaden in
./showthread.php?p=184​71063&i=i246693068
forum: Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

Pretty girl




LOG IN TO REPLY
mdvaden
Goldmember
mdvaden's Avatar
Joined Mar 2009
Beaverton, Oregon
Oct 13, 2017 16:19 |  #65

George Zip wrote in post #18471713 (external link)
Just to totally derail this thread, and not compare apples with apples and not answer the original question... which is usual forum behaviour ..Even though I don't mind the 50 1.4... I think the 40mm 2.8 pancake is a better lens for less money... if 2.8 is fast enough of course. Here is a picture of some dudes bulldog when I was out walking. I sometimes take my camera with the 40mm because it is so light.
thumbnailHosted photo: posted by George Zip in
./showthread.php?p=184​71713&i=i205669288
forum: Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

Seems very much on topic actually.

Couple days ago reading this thread, that very lens came to mind as closely related to the discussion.


vadenphotography.comexternal link . . . and . . . Coast Redwoods Main Pageexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
ejenner's Avatar
Joined Nov 2011
Denver, CO
Post has been last edited 2 months ago by ejenner. 2 edits done in total.
Oct 13, 2017 21:39 |  #66

I just got the Tamron 45 1.8. Wanted IS. 2/3 stop slower, but I only really need f2. Bokeh on the Canon is very iffy, Tamy is in a different bokeh league. Also $200 instant rebate until tomorrow.

The Tamy is a nice lens IMO, tested the copy and AF is accurate and consistent (albeit not exactly fast).

I had looked at the 40 2.8, but wanted something a stop faster. Had also considered the 50 STM, but it seemed like it was/is going to be soft at f2 where I am going to position my subjects (at the edges of the AF area).

I think just looking at the pics from the Tamy, my copy of the 50 1.4 must be fairly sharp, certainly at f2 where I mostly shot it but the Tamy is better, more consistent in Al-Servo, nice Bokeh in general.


Edward Jenner
5DIII, 7DII, M6, GX1 II,M11-22, Sig15mm FE,16-35 F4,TS-E 17,Sig 18-250 OS Macro,M18-150,24-105,T45 1.8VC,70-200 f4 IS,70-200 2.8 vII,Sig 85 1.4,100L,135L,400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Tom Reichner's Avatar
Joined Dec 2008
Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
Post has been edited 1 month ago by Tom Reichner.
Oct 21, 2017 12:47 |  #67

artsf wrote in post #18471147 (external link)
that bokeh is crazy distracting and draws all the attention away from otherwise beautiful subject

Yes, I agree that the bokeh is very distracting, and actually rather ugly ......... but, wow - what an absolutely stunning subject!

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "peace of mind", NOT "piece of mind".

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

15,945 views & 26 likes for this thread
Is the Canon 50mm 1.4 good...enough...?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00091 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.09s
Latest registered member is GHPub
990 guests, 471 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017