Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk
Thread started 06 Sep 2017 (Wednesday) 18:31
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

which lens would you rather have?

 
James ­ Crockett
Member
James Crockett's Avatar
121 posts
Joined May 2017
Sep 06, 2017 18:31 |  #1

sigma 35mm 1.4 art or canon ef 24-70mm 2.8L ii...??




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Joined Dec 2010
Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
Sep 06, 2017 18:42 |  #2

Assuming it's for a camera with an APS-C sensor, probably the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 Art. If I could only pick from those two it would still be the Sigma. But I really like a decently fast standard lens.

The 24-70 would be great if I had a camera with a 35mm sensor, but it would not be a focal length range that would interest me on APS-C.

I'd quite like a fast, i.e. faster than f/2, 22mm lens for an APS-C sensor too. Although I huess the aforementioned 18-35 pretty much deals with that, along with the 18mm. Certainly covers the old 28/35/50 prime combos that seemed popular on 35mm film back in the late 70's when I got interested in photography.

Alan.


My Flickr (external link)
My new Aviation images blog site (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
DaviSto
... sorry. I got carried away!
DaviSto's Avatar
Joined Nov 2016
Abuja Nigeria
Post has been edited 2 months ago by DaviSto.
Sep 06, 2017 18:43 |  #3

To photograph what?


Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Crockett
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
James Crockett's Avatar
121 posts
Joined May 2017
Sep 06, 2017 18:50 |  #4

full frame canon 5d series. portrait photography use. That 24-70 2.8 ii looks like a beast. The wide angle lens and portrait combined..




LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
FarmerTed1971's Avatar
Joined Sep 2013
Portland, OR
Sep 06, 2017 18:52 |  #5

The 24-70 is more versatile obviously.

What other lenses do you own?


Getting better at this - Fuji Xt-2 - Fuji X-Pro2 - 18-55 - 35 f2 WR - 50-140 - 6D - 135L - 70-200 f4L IS - 600EX-RT x2 - ST-E3-RT - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
DaviSto
... sorry. I got carried away!
DaviSto's Avatar
Joined Nov 2016
Abuja Nigeria
Post has been edited 2 months ago by DaviSto.
Sep 06, 2017 18:56 |  #6

James Crockett wrote in post #18446271 (external link)
full frame canon 5d series. portrait photography use. That
24-70 2.8 ii looks like a beast. The wide angle lens and portrait combined..

Then .. between those two, certainly the 24-70 f/2.8 ... no contest. But why just those particular two?


Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Crockett
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
James Crockett's Avatar
121 posts
Joined May 2017
Sep 06, 2017 19:05 |  #7

FarmerTed1971 wrote in post #18446273 (external link)
The 24-70 is more versatile obviously.

What other lenses do you own?


DaviSto wrote in post #18446276 (external link)
Then .. between those two, certainly the 24-70 f/2.8 ... no contest. But why just those particular two?

I have a 135l f2 100mm macro and the 35mm sigma 1.4 art. I've thought about selling the sigma and get the 24-70 2.8...




LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
FarmerTed1971's Avatar
Joined Sep 2013
Portland, OR
Sep 06, 2017 20:22 |  #8

Definitely the 24-70 then.


Getting better at this - Fuji Xt-2 - Fuji X-Pro2 - 18-55 - 35 f2 WR - 50-140 - 6D - 135L - 70-200 f4L IS - 600EX-RT x2 - ST-E3-RT - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Crockett
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
James Crockett's Avatar
121 posts
Joined May 2017
Sep 06, 2017 20:45 |  #9

only thing bothers me is doesn't have image stabilization but I do like how versatile the lens is. I've considered this one and the 50mm 1.2L..




LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
DreDaze's Avatar
17,719 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Joined Mar 2006
S.F. Bay Area
Sep 06, 2017 21:04 |  #10

James Crockett wrote in post #18446331 (external link)
only thing bothers me is doesn't have image stabilization but I do like how versatile the lens is. I've considered this one and the 50mm 1.2L..

there are options with stabilization...you could look at the tamron and sigma 24-70f2.8's...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)
my 366 for 2016 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
James ­ Crockett
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
James Crockett's Avatar
121 posts
Joined May 2017
Sep 06, 2017 21:07 |  #11

DreDaze wrote in post #18446340 (external link)
there are options with stabilization...you could look at the tamron and sigma 24-70f2.8's...

Thanks! I've looked at the sigma 24-70 but rather stick to Canon L series stuff.




LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
FarmerTed1971's Avatar
Joined Sep 2013
Portland, OR
Sep 06, 2017 21:48 |  #12

You don't NEED IS in modern bodies... just push the ISO a bit. It can handle it. The 24-70 II is a beast.

A inexpensive alternative would be the 35 f2 IS. Killer lens. And very inexpensive.


Getting better at this - Fuji Xt-2 - Fuji X-Pro2 - 18-55 - 35 f2 WR - 50-140 - 6D - 135L - 70-200 f4L IS - 600EX-RT x2 - ST-E3-RT - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Angmo
Senior Member
Angmo's Avatar
Joined Dec 2015
AZ-USA
Post has been last edited 2 months ago by Angmo. 3 edits done in total.
Sep 06, 2017 21:50 |  #13

In Nikon 35mm. 20, 35, 50, 85, 135DC, 200, 300
And all the FL lenses Nikon makes.

Oh, and a teleconverter for grins.

Medium Format: 40, 60, 80, 180, 300 and 1.4 teleconverter.


Nikons, Rolleiflexes, Elinchroms

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bassat
"I am still in my underwear."
Bassat's Avatar
6,589 posts
Joined Oct 2015
Bourbon, Indiana - USA
Sep 06, 2017 22:54 |  #14

Of those two, I'd take the 35. No use for f/2.8 zooms.


Tom

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Alveric's Avatar
Joined Jan 2011
Canada
Sep 06, 2017 23:51 |  #15

Canon's.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

4,365 views & 14 likes for this thread
which lens would you rather have?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00095 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is Desser
937 guests, 457 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016