Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Changing Camera Brands
Thread started 30 Sep 2017 (Saturday) 14:26
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Switching from DSLR to mirrorless

 
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Wilt's Avatar
39,020 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2005
Belmont, CA
Post has been edited 14 days ago by Wilt.
Oct 06, 2017 09:30 |  #16

mystik610 wrote in post #18464562 (external link)
A99II isn't technically mirrorless, though it does has an on sensor PDAF system and EVF and behaves like one.

^
You can see the mirror in this shot... https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com ...ny_alpha_a99_ii_dsl​r.html (external link)

As for the apparent size/weight advantage of mirrorless body over dSLR body, in the case of the A99II...

A99II Physical (from B&H)
Dimensions (W x H x D) 5.6 x 4.1 x 3.0" / 142.6 x 104.2 x 76.1 mm
Weight 1.868 lbs / 849 g with battery and memory card

T6i Physical (from B&H)
Dimensions (W x H x D) 5.2 x 4.0 x 3.1" / 13.2 x 10.1 x 7.8 cm
Weight 19.58 oz (1.22 lbs) / 555.09 g

80D Physical (from B&H)
Dimensions (W x H x D) 5.5 x 4.1 x 3.1" / 139.0 x 105.2 x 78.5 mm
Weight 1.606 lbs / 730 g based on CIPA guidelines


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
Joined May 2007
Oak Park, Illinois
Post has been edited 13 days ago by airfrogusmc.
Oct 07, 2017 08:44 as a reply to Wilt's post |  #17

Leica M 10
23.3 ozs
1.45 pds
0r 660.54 grams

Height 3.1 in
Width 5.5 in
Depth 1.5 in




LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Goldmember
mike_d's Avatar
4,970 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Oct 07, 2017 10:44 |  #18

airfrogusmc wrote in post #18467763 (external link)
Leica M 10
23.3 ozs
1.45 pds
0r 660.54 grams

Height 3.1 in
Width 5.5 in
Depth 1.5 in

$6895




LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
Joined May 2007
Oak Park, Illinois
Oct 07, 2017 10:47 |  #19

mike_d wrote in post #18467837 (external link)
$6895

And? The good stuff is usually pricey. No more than the top Nicanons




LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Goldmember
mike_d's Avatar
4,970 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Oct 07, 2017 10:49 |  #20

airfrogusmc wrote in post #18467839 (external link)
And? The good stuff is usually pricey. No more than the top Nicanons

Every time there's a discussion of cameras that might be in the $1000-$3000, you wave the flag for something costing several times as much.




LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
Joined May 2007
Oak Park, Illinois
Oct 07, 2017 10:52 |  #21

mike_d wrote in post #18467841 (external link)
Every time there's a discussion of cameras that might be in the $1000-$3000, you wave the flag for something costing several times as much.

Just an alternative to the pretty much the same ole same ole. Don't like my words then don't tune in. But what would a forum be without different points of view.




LOG IN TO REPLY
mickeyb105
Goldmember
mickeyb105's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Vero Beach, FL
Oct 07, 2017 23:57 |  #22

Wilt wrote in post #18467186 (external link)
^
You can see the mirror in this shot... https://www.bhphotovid​eo.com ...ny_alpha_a99_ii_dsl​r.html (external link)

As for the apparent size/weight advantage of mirrorless body over dSLR body, in the case of the A99II...

A99II Physical (from B&H)
Dimensions (W x H x D) 5.6 x 4.1 x 3.0" / 142.6 x 104.2 x 76.1 mm
Weight 1.868 lbs / 849 g with battery and memory card

T6i Physical (from B&H)
Dimensions (W x H x D) 5.2 x 4.0 x 3.1" / 13.2 x 10.1 x 7.8 cm
Weight 19.58 oz (1.22 lbs) / 555.09 g

80D Physical (from B&H)
Dimensions (W x H x D) 5.5 x 4.1 x 3.1" / 139.0 x 105.2 x 78.5 mm
Weight 1.606 lbs / 730 g based on CIPA guidelines

A99ii is a FF body with dual card slots and a joystick--why are you comparing it to two crop sensor bodies without semi-pro controls?


Sony A99ii, RX-100ii, Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 ZA, Minolta HS 200 2.8 APO, Zeiss 24/2 ZA, Minolta 2xTC APO, HVL-F43M
Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
mickeyb105
Goldmember
mickeyb105's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Vero Beach, FL
Oct 08, 2017 00:16 |  #23

Drums wrote in post #18467052 (external link)
the A mount has a poor lens selection, and 3rd party manufacturers like Tamron and sigma don't make A mount lenses anymore they concentrate on the Sony E mount.

Aside from tilt-shift lenses, a 400 2.8 and a 200 f2, what lens were you looking for that A-mount does not provide?

The older Minolta glass is inexpensive and impressive. The a99ii gives the screwdrive mount glass plenty of AF points, even if the SSM lenses get many more.

Shooting the Zeiss 135 1.8 on a stabilized 42MP Sony sensor with eye-AF is something you can do on no other DSLR-sized body. Also, no need to buy a grip/battery just to reach 9FPS. 12 FPS is available anytime on the a99ii. Tammy came out with the 150-600ii several months back for a-mount, and it isn't difficult to find whatever Sigma glass one would want browsing through B&H and Adorama--not to mention e-Bay.

E-mount is fantastic, no doubt, but the a99ii is one heck of a body with elite lenses available to it.


Sony A99ii, RX-100ii, Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 ZA, Minolta HS 200 2.8 APO, Zeiss 24/2 ZA, Minolta 2xTC APO, HVL-F43M
Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Wilt's Avatar
39,020 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2005
Belmont, CA
Post has been last edited 11 days ago by Wilt. 5 edits done in total.
Oct 08, 2017 13:39 |  #24

mickeyb105 wrote in post #18468195 (external link)
A99ii is a FF body with dual card slots and a joystick--why are you comparing it to two crop sensor bodies without semi-pro controls?

Simply to disprove generalizations, to show that the A99 - not being 'mirrorless' -- is not 'more compact and lightweight' than dSLRs, as folks tend to think are true of all mirrorless.
After all, the OP started this thread as "wwitching from DSLR to mirrorless" and then mentions considering the A99RII. And while you rightfully point out the apples and oranges comparison resulting from FF vs. APS-C, folks fail to consider sensor size in comparing mirrorless as well...there are Olympus mirrorless which are smaller and lighter but use the 4/3 sensor and FL which are 1/2 as long! And Sony FF mirrorless which are not that much lighter and smaller, when you consider the same FL lenses required for same size sensors.

IOW, to compare in a valid manner one must understand the comparison and what are differences.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

LOG IN TO REPLY
ammo
Member
ammo's Avatar
200 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Cornwall, UK.
Oct 09, 2017 00:44 |  #25

Sounds odd - but have you not looked into the A9? Seems to be the only real mirrorless which seems replaceable to a DSLR


Check me out :)
Wedding Photographer Cornwallexternal linkMy Facebookexternal link
My Flickrexternal link
Cornwall Wedding Photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mickeyb105
Goldmember
mickeyb105's Avatar
Joined Dec 2011
Vero Beach, FL
Oct 10, 2017 07:43 |  #26

Wilt wrote in post #18468496 (external link)
Simply to disprove generalizations, to show that the A99 - not being 'mirrorless' -- is not 'more compact and lightweight' than dSLRs

Only the Canon 6D series is more compact and lightweight than the A99ii if we are talking about FF DSLR-style bodies.


Sony A99ii, RX-100ii, Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 ZA, Minolta HS 200 2.8 APO, Zeiss 24/2 ZA, Minolta 2xTC APO, HVL-F43M
Flickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,101 views & 15 likes for this thread
Switching from DSLR to mirrorless
FORUMS General Gear Talk Changing Camera Brands


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00082 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is Ginn
985 guests, 458 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016