Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk
Thread started 09 Oct 2017 (Monday) 15:00
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Wedding Macro > Lens vs. Small camera w/ Macro?

 
mdvaden
Goldmember
mdvaden's Avatar
Joined Mar 2009
Beaverton, Oregon
Post has been edited 11 days ago by mdvaden.
Oct 09, 2017 15:00 |  #1

While sitting here deciding between Canon's 100mm L macro and Tamron's 90mm macro w/ 6 yr. warranty, a thought came to mind.

Have any others opted to shoot macro needs like rings, using a small camera instead

The thought behind the question isn't money. Just wondering whether others found a benefit from having a 2nd or 3rd camera more so than an extra lens., like a G7x ... G 16 or other?


vadenphotography.comexternal link . . . and . . . Coast Redwoods Main Pageexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tixeon
Goldmember
Tixeon's Avatar
Joined Oct 2004
44657
Oct 09, 2017 19:02 |  #2

I'm long retired from wedding work but I don't see why it couldn't work just fine. I have the Canon 100mm macro lens on a 5D & a Canon G5X. They both do wonderful macro or closeup shots. The G5X will usually have a bit more depth of field than the 100mm macro for a similar shot. So I guess it' whether you want to carry an extra camera versus the 100mm macro lens. The extra camera such as a G7X would probably weigh less.


Tim
______
Any cat owner will tell you -- no one really owns a cat...

LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
ejenner's Avatar
Joined Nov 2011
Denver, CO
Post has been edited 11 days ago by ejenner.
Oct 09, 2017 22:07 |  #3

Not likely to ever do a wedding, but is there a reason folks don't just carry an extension tube? Buying a macro lens for one (or a couple) shot seems overkill.

I guess if your other lenses are zooms, then they might give you too much CA, especially with shiny objects, but they should be OK stopped down a bit.


Edward Jenner
5DIII, 7DII, M6, GX1 II,M11-22, Sig15mm FE,16-35 F4,TS-E 17,Sig 18-250 OS Macro,M18-150,24-105,T45 1.8VC,70-200 f4 IS,70-200 2.8 vII,Sig 85 1.4,100L,135L,400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY

400 views & 3 likes for this thread
Wedding Macro > Lens vs. Small camera w/ Macro?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00083 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is ashleyrose315
831 guests, 394 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016