Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 03 Nov 2017 (Friday) 17:28
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Help me get rid of one of 5 lens

 
level5photog
Member
163 posts
Joined Nov 2015
Post has been edited 19 days ago by level5photog.
Nov 03, 2017 17:28 |  #1

I have Sigma 85 Art 1.4, Sigma 135 1.8 Art, Tamron 90 macro IS, Canon 24-70 II 2.8, 70-200 II 2.8 and Tamron 15-30 2.8 IS. I shoot mostly wedding, portrait, and engagement.

I'm thinking of selling the Sigma 85 1.4 Art as the odd one out. I rarely shoot the 85 other than indoor portrait. I do like the 135 much more than 85. Better bokeh and focusing for me.




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
basketballfreak6
Goldmember
Joined Jan 2011
Brisbane, Australia
Nov 03, 2017 20:12 |  #2

Haven't had too much experience with the 85 art but I do agree the 135 art is a very special lens...you def want to keep 24-70 and 70-200 obviously being staple wedding kit and you want UWA for those situations that requires it and macro for detail shots so yea I'd say the 85 as well...I actually lost my lust for the 85 (especially since the new canon 1.4 IS samples haven't been too exciting) because how awesome the 135 is


https://www.instagram.​com/tony.liu.photograp​hy/ (external link)
flickr (external link)
https://500px.com/tony​_liu_photography (external link)
5DIV, 5DIII, modified 760D, 16-35L f/4 IS, 24-70L II f/2.8, 70-200L IS II f/2.8, S150-600 f/5-6.3 SPORT, S14 f/1.8 ART, S50 f/1.4 ART, S135 f/1.8 ART, 100L IS Macro f/2.8

LOG IN TO REPLY
level5photog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
163 posts
Joined Nov 2015
Nov 03, 2017 20:43 |  #3

basketballfreak6 wrote in post #18488004 (external link)
Haven't had too much experience with the 85 art but I do agree the 135 art is a very special lens...you def want to keep 24-70 and 70-200 obviously being staple wedding kit and you want UWA for those situations that requires it and macro for detail shots so yea I'd say the 85 as well...I actually lost my lust for the 85 (especially since the new canon 1.4 IS samples haven't been too exciting) because how awesome the 135 is


Thanks. I was definitely leaning that way. I don't shoot @ 1.4 as much as I thought I would be. Too thin of focus for portraits for me.




LOG IN TO REPLY
davesrose
Goldmember
2,869 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Atlanta, GA
Nov 03, 2017 20:55 |  #4

Well my opinion is that you're the best judge of what focal ranges you use. What might be appropriate for one person may not be appropriate for the next. Seems like you've already made up your mind and are looking for more affirmations: you're leaning towards the 85mm;-)a


Canon 5D mk III , 7D mk II
EF 135mm 2.0L, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS II, EF 24-70 2.8L II, EF 50mm 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8L Macro, EF 16-35mm 4L IS, Sigma 150-600mm C, 580EX, 600EX-RT, MeFoto Globetrotter tripod, grips, Black Rapid RS-7, CAMS plate and strap system, Lowepro Flipside 500 AW, and a few other things...
smugmug (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
13,714 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Nov 03, 2017 22:51 |  #5

Replace macro with extension tubes.

I generally prefer 135 over 85, but plenty of ways the 85 is useful. Your lack of use may be temporary.


Sony A7rii x2 - FE 12-24/4 - FE 24-240 - FE 35/2.8 - CV 35/1.7 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - EF 135/1.8 Art - F 600/5.6 - CZ 35-70, 100-300 - Astro Rok 14/2.8, 24/1.4 - Tamron 28-75 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 VC

LOG IN TO REPLY
level5photog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
163 posts
Joined Nov 2015
Nov 04, 2017 10:10 |  #6

Charlie wrote in post #18488093 (external link)
Replace macro with extension tubes.

I generally prefer 135 over 85, but plenty of ways the 85 is useful. Your lack of use may be temporary.

What extensions tube for what lens work the best?




LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
FarmerTed1971's Avatar
Joined Sep 2013
Portland, OR
Nov 04, 2017 10:12 |  #7

How often do you shoot wider than 24mm? I'd be inclined to drop that Tammy...


Getting better at this - Fuji Xt-2 - Fuji X-Pro2 - 18-55 - 35 f2 WR - 50-140 - 6D - 135L - 70-200 f4L IS - 600EX-RT x2 - ST-E3-RT - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
FarmerTed1971
fondling the 5D4
FarmerTed1971's Avatar
Joined Sep 2013
Portland, OR
Nov 04, 2017 10:13 |  #8

In fact drop BOTH Tammy's.


Getting better at this - Fuji Xt-2 - Fuji X-Pro2 - 18-55 - 35 f2 WR - 50-140 - 6D - 135L - 70-200 f4L IS - 600EX-RT x2 - ST-E3-RT - flickr (external link) - www.scottaticephoto.co​m (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
texkam
"Just let me be a stupid photographer."
texkam's Avatar
1,111 posts
Joined Mar 2012
By The Lake in Big D
Nov 04, 2017 10:36 |  #9

I like the extension tubes for the 90 idea.




LOG IN TO REPLY
level5photog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
163 posts
Joined Nov 2015
Post has been edited 19 days ago by level5photog.
Nov 04, 2017 11:29 as a reply to FarmerTed1971's post |  #10

I do use the Tamron 15-30. I shoot at 15mm alot. I do landscape and environmental portraits with it. It is also very good for astrophotography too




LOG IN TO REPLY
nautox
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Sep 2016
Post has been edited 18 days ago by nautox.
Nov 04, 2017 15:11 |  #11

My .02

If it was me I would sell the 85 1.4 and the Tamron 90, but not because they are not good, they are both excellent lenses.
I would then get a 100mm 2.8L IS
Mainly to have in the bag a good (inner focusing like your Tamron) macro with portrait ability. And having IS with excellent contrast and color rendition as a bonus :-)

Question: Can the bokeh on the 85 1.4 get "unpleasant" as it's rumored to be? There are pictures of both excellent and not so nice bokeh out there as examples.
Or maybe it's an overblown condition like light bleed on a laptop screen that you can only notice for 2 seconds on start up?




LOG IN TO REPLY
level5photog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
163 posts
Joined Nov 2015
Nov 04, 2017 22:08 |  #12

nautox wrote in post #18488613 (external link)
My .02

If it was me I would sell the 85 1.4 and the Tamron 90, but not because they are not good, they are both excellent lenses.
I would then get a 100mm 2.8L IS
Mainly to have in the bag a good (inner focusing like your Tamron) macro with portrait ability. And having IS with excellent contrast and color rendition as a bonus :-)

Question: Can the bokeh on the 85 1.4 get "unpleasant" as it's rumored to be? There are pictures of both excellent and not so nice bokeh out there as examples.
Or maybe it's an overblown condition like light bleed on a laptop screen that you can only notice for 2 seconds on start up?

Thanks I'm leaning towards letting go 85 1.4. I have use the 85 1.2 L and found the bokeh to be very comparable to Sigma. But I don't shoot at 1.4. I really don't like shooting at 1.4 for portrait that much.

I'm exploring macro tube and see if I can replace that.




LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
FEChariot's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
Nov 05, 2017 23:26 |  #13

I picked up a set of fotodiox tubes from B&H for $50. You could pay more for Kenko tubes or worse yet Canon but the results aren’t going to be any better and the fotodiox tubes are plenty sturdy on the build quality side.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ah-keong
Senior Member
Ah-keong's Avatar
Joined Apr 2016
Nov 06, 2017 02:36 |  #14

85mm would be beneficial indoors if space is of a concern....
do reconsider....


Canon 7D Mark II | BG-E16 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm | Sigma DC 18-35mm ART |
Canon Speedlite 430EX III-RT |
Olympus E-PL3 | M.Zuiko ED 7-14mm PRO
Manfrotto BeFree Travel Tripod |
Tenba DNA 15 Messenger | Think Tank Photo Digital Holster 40v2.0 | Speed Changer v2.0

LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
TeamSpeed's Avatar
32,239 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Joined May 2002
Northern Indiana
Nov 06, 2017 04:16 as a reply to Ah-keong's post |  #15

70-200 covers that, and is great for portraits.


Past Equipment | My Gallery (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

3,403 views & 3 likes for this thread
Help me get rid of one of 5 lens
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00096 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is belerim
993 guests, 481 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016