Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News
Thread started 09 Nov 2017 (Thursday) 00:42
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

A 35mm Film Camera

 
Mark0159
I say stupid things all the time
Mark0159's Avatar
12,717 posts
Gallery: 27 photos
Joined Mar 2003
Hamilton, New Zealand
Nov 09, 2017 00:42 |  #1

https://petapixel.com ...r-camera-design-25-years/ (external link)


Mark
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/52782633@N04 (external link)
Canon EOS 6D | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM | Tamron SP 35mm F1.8 Di VC USD | Canon Speedlite 550EX -|- Film | Canon EOS 3 | Olympus OM2 | Zuiko 35mm f2

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mcoren
Senior Member
mcoren's Avatar
Joined Mar 2015
Northern Virginia, USA
Nov 10, 2017 10:21 |  #2

I must be missing something. There are any number of high quality 35mm film cameras in good condition on eBay or Craigslist for less than $100. Why would people pledge £350 (US$450+) for this? Is it a hipster status symbol or am I missing something?


Canon EOS 70D | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM, 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM | Canon Speedlite 430EX II

LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
saea501's Avatar
Joined Jan 2010
Florida
Nov 10, 2017 10:30 as a reply to mcoren's post |  #3

I'm missing it too. But then I can't imagine why anyone would want to go back to shooting film.

And you're right, ebay is full of Nikon and Canon film cameras.


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob

LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
MalVeauX's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
Florida
Nov 10, 2017 10:33 |  #4

Just a company trying to cash in on the popular film retro market right now.

I can't imagine someone into retro film stuff, whatever label you want to give them, caring at all about a new item to do what the point was, which is to use an old item, like an old film camera.

That price is straight silly. But, someone out there will buy it and think its cool.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Chet
For $20, I'll be your friend.
Chet's Avatar
41,621 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Joined Sep 2007
Nov 10, 2017 10:40 |  #5

The picture output samples absolutely suck. At least try and take a decent picture to push your idiot retro mistake.


Curator of the Bob's Pickle Emporium experience. -As always, One location to serve you better!
~Feel good today and donate to this great forum~ LINK
My Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
photosbytw
Goldmember
photosbytw's Avatar
Joined Jan 2015
Blue Ridge Mountains
Nov 10, 2017 10:53 as a reply to saea501's post |  #6

"I can't imagine why anyone would want to go back to shooting film"......because it's still fun!;-)a


Don't even begin to think I'm criticizing your images.
Just a natural curiosity.
tw
www.photosbytw.net (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Moderator
PhotosGuy's Avatar
74,824 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Joined Feb 2004
Middle of Michigan
Nov 10, 2017 11:14 |  #7

photosbytw wrote in post #18493382 (external link)
"I can't imagine why anyone would want to go back to shooting film"......because it's still fun!;-)a

You probably wish you still had to hand crank your car to start it!

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/PhotosGuy/Forum%20Junk/rotfl.01.gif

FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1280 pixels on any side.

LOG IN TO REPLY
jcothron
Goldmember
jcothron's Avatar
Joined Nov 2008
Gainesville, GA
Nov 10, 2017 11:25 |  #8

It IS fun, but I choose to have that particular kind of fun very rarely :)


John
Gear List|My Flickr (external link)|Website (external link)|500px (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sjones
Goldmember
sjones's Avatar
2,193 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Chicago
Nov 10, 2017 12:13 |  #9

saea501 wrote in post #18493368 (external link)
I'm missing it too. But then I can't imagine why anyone would want to go back to shooting film...

Whelp, roughly 7 billion folks on the planet; they can't all be just like you.


Asheville to Chicago 2016-2017 (external link)
Eggleston's photography is superb. Deal with it!
It's the Photographer (external link) | God Loves Photoshop (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
DaviSto
... sorry. I got carried away!
DaviSto's Avatar
Joined Nov 2016
Abuja Nigeria
Nov 10, 2017 12:17 |  #10

Most likely a scam in my opinion ... ... At best an idea whose time will never come.


Comment and (constructive) criticism always welcome.

LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
saea501's Avatar
Joined Jan 2010
Florida
Nov 10, 2017 12:18 |  #11

sjones wrote in post #18493436 (external link)
Whelp, roughly 7 billion folks on the planet; they can't all be just like you.

Nice kick in the balls. What a lovely response.


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob

LOG IN TO REPLY
sjones
Goldmember
sjones's Avatar
2,193 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Chicago
Nov 10, 2017 12:48 |  #12

saea501 wrote in post #18493438 (external link)
Nice kick in the balls. What a lovely response.

You might want to reconsider your barb; the original one: That is, you can’t imagine ANYONE wanting to shoot film. This statement reflects positively on film shooters how?

Anyway, want a more in-depth response, read:

http://27-303.tumblr.com/post/31​017936386/film (external link)

I wrote this five years ago. I’ve been meaning to do a rewrite, but until then, I hope this helps you imagine why someone else might want to shoot film.

In response to the overall thread, as a film shooter, I reckon I’m encouraged to see any film-related item added to the market (even gimmicky), after watching so many things vanish.

The camera is unique in its modular design; will people care about this; I don’t know. But if you all don’t think Nikon, Canon, and the like aren’t doing their own thing to exploitatively lure in naive consumers, then a grasp on reality might be recommended.

Oh, and I hope we all realize the immutable fact that DSLRs are now ‘retro.’ Take it for what you will…

Anyway, I’m out of this thread; said all I need to in the link above; gets tiresome trying to defend choice.


Asheville to Chicago 2016-2017 (external link)
Eggleston's photography is superb. Deal with it!
It's the Photographer (external link) | God Loves Photoshop (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
saea501
... spilled over a little on the panties
saea501's Avatar
Joined Jan 2010
Florida
Nov 10, 2017 14:02 as a reply to sjones's post |  #13

Lighten up, chief.

You're way overthinking this.


Remember what the DorMouse said.....feed your head.
Bob

LOG IN TO REPLY
rantercsr
Goldmember
rantercsr's Avatar
Joined Mar 2014
Nov 10, 2017 14:08 |  #14

Not for me.. but i could see someone who is really into film wanting it..

Ive started messing about with film. It's a different photographic experience than digital..
But if think I'd rather get a contax of some sort over this..


Canon 5DIV*T4i/10-18/24 f2.8/ 35 f1.4Lii /50 f1.4/ 85 f1.8
Pentax k1000* k50 f2*135 f2.
Fuji XT2 // 23 f2/ 50 f2
https://www.instagram.​com/shotbypops/ (external link) MYflickr (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
MalVeauX's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
Florida
Post has been edited 8 days ago by MalVeauX.
Nov 10, 2017 14:22 |  #15

I've thought about going back to film (well, more just add it as a side project, fun). I shot film in the 80's and 90's. Got my first digital Kodak in the mid 90's. Been digital ever since. Too convenient.

I think if I were going to look at film again these days, for the money, I don't think I'd want to mess around with 35mm. I already have that, but digital. Same FOV. Same lots of things. I just can't review photos and I'm limited to how many I can take. And sadly, most people shooting film and sharing their images have to scan them at some point... so, all kinds of mixed feelings about bothering to do all that just to make them digital anyways. I think if I were to get into film, I'd probably look at the inexpensive film medium format stuff. It's cheap. It's different.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

433 views & 4 likes for this thread
A 35mm Film Camera
FORUMS News & Rumors Photography Industry News


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00099 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.05s
Latest registered member is Rtruelove
805 guests, 427 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016