Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Other Digital Cameras Olympus Digital Cameras
Thread started 16 Nov 2017 (Thursday) 18:16
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Just how great is the 12-40mm f2.8 Pro?

 
Scottboarding
Senior Member
Scottboarding's Avatar
Joined May 2016
Nov 16, 2017 18:16 |  #1

So I'm starting to give into getting a zoom lens for my E-M1 after months of telling myself I don't need one. Video is what's really pushing me, and I'd really like to have a weathersealed lens as well. This seems to be my only option in my budget. I don't want the EZ lenses as I like to have full control over my zooming, and superzooms are not my forte. This really leaves me with just this lens, or the 12-100 (which is super far out of my budget). Is this lens as good as I've heard? Or am I wasting my money?

Thanks everyone!


Olympus E-M1 - Mitakon 25mm f0.95 - Olympus 25mm f1.8 - Olympus 17mm f1.8
Nikon FM2n - Nikon Ai-s 28mm f2.8 - Nikon Ai 50mm f1.4 - Voigtlander 40mm f2 SLii
Ricoh GRii

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
raptor3x
Senior Member
raptor3x's Avatar
Joined Aug 2011
Rutland, VT
Nov 16, 2017 21:34 |  #2

Scottboarding wrote in post #18498123 (external link)
So I'm starting to give into getting a zoom lens for my E-M1 after months of telling myself I don't need one. Video is what's really pushing me, and I'd really like to have a weathersealed lens as well. This seems to be my only option in my budget. I don't want the EZ lenses as I like to have full control over my zooming, and superzooms are not my forte. This really leaves me with just this lens, or the 12-100 (which is super far out of my budget). Is this lens as good as I've heard? Or am I wasting my money?

Thanks everyone!


It's very good, the only downside is the bokeh can get a bit nervous at times, but that's true of all Olympus' pro lenses except for the 25 1.2. Another option if you prefer a bit more range is the PanaLeica 12-60 f/2.8-4.


Bodies: X-T1, E-M1, E-M1ii Lenses: µ.Z 7-14 2.8, µ.Z 12-40 2.8, µ.Z 25 1.2, X 18-55 2.8-4, µ.Z 40-150 2.8, µ.Z 45 1.2, µ.Z 60 2.8, µ.Z 75 1.8, Z 150 2.0, µ.Z 300 4.0

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottboarding
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Scottboarding's Avatar
Joined May 2016
Nov 17, 2017 09:13 |  #3

raptor3x wrote in post #18498241 (external link)
It's very good, the only downside is the bokeh can get a bit nervous at times, but that's true of all Olympus' pro lenses except for the 25 1.2. Another option if you prefer a bit more range is the PanaLeica 12-60 f/2.8-4.

I would love that lens, but that's out of my budget. I see the 12-40mm go for $600 which is doable for me. I'm not horribly concerned with bokeh quality, but I'll keep that in mind. Thanks!


Olympus E-M1 - Mitakon 25mm f0.95 - Olympus 25mm f1.8 - Olympus 17mm f1.8
Nikon FM2n - Nikon Ai-s 28mm f2.8 - Nikon Ai 50mm f1.4 - Voigtlander 40mm f2 SLii
Ricoh GRii

LOG IN TO REPLY
raptor3x
Senior Member
raptor3x's Avatar
Joined Aug 2011
Rutland, VT
Nov 17, 2017 09:51 |  #4

Scottboarding wrote in post #18498463 (external link)
I would love that lens, but that's out of my budget. I see the 12-40mm go for $600 which is doable for me. I'm not horribly concerned with bokeh quality, but I'll keep that in mind. Thanks!

Grey market copies of the PL 12-60 show up brand new for a touch over $600 all the time on eBay.


Bodies: X-T1, E-M1, E-M1ii Lenses: µ.Z 7-14 2.8, µ.Z 12-40 2.8, µ.Z 25 1.2, X 18-55 2.8-4, µ.Z 40-150 2.8, µ.Z 45 1.2, µ.Z 60 2.8, µ.Z 75 1.8, Z 150 2.0, µ.Z 300 4.0

LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottboarding
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Scottboarding's Avatar
Joined May 2016
Nov 17, 2017 10:25 |  #5

raptor3x wrote in post #18498476 (external link)
Grey market copies of the PL 12-60 show up brand new for a touch over $600 all the time on eBay.

Aww man, now I really have to make a decision. Part of me wishes you never told me that :lol:


Olympus E-M1 - Mitakon 25mm f0.95 - Olympus 25mm f1.8 - Olympus 17mm f1.8
Nikon FM2n - Nikon Ai-s 28mm f2.8 - Nikon Ai 50mm f1.4 - Voigtlander 40mm f2 SLii
Ricoh GRii

LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon ­ Dog
Senior Member
Canon Dog's Avatar
Joined Oct 2011
Nov 17, 2017 11:06 |  #6

I would take the Olympus f2.8 with a constant aperture. I do not like it when the aperture changes when I zoom. Just my taste yours my be different.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottboarding
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Scottboarding's Avatar
Joined May 2016
Nov 17, 2017 12:14 |  #7

Canon Dog wrote in post #18498528 (external link)
I would take the Olympus f2.8 with a constant aperture. I do not like it when the aperture changes when I zoom. Just my taste yours my be different.

I agree with that. Especially considering I'm going to be zoom while recording and I don't want the flickering. I would absolutely love the 12-100mm, but that's not going to happen.


Olympus E-M1 - Mitakon 25mm f0.95 - Olympus 25mm f1.8 - Olympus 17mm f1.8
Nikon FM2n - Nikon Ai-s 28mm f2.8 - Nikon Ai 50mm f1.4 - Voigtlander 40mm f2 SLii
Ricoh GRii

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronin1
Member
157 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Dec 24, 2017 10:48 |  #8

I haven’t shot the 12-60 but have the Olympus. I love the lens. It is sharp, has good resolution, and is always mounted on my EM1 as it pretty much covers the range I like to shoot in. I paid almost 800 for it about 1.5 years ago so the price is much more reasonable now.


Olympus E-M1 | Canon EOS 60D, EOS M | Olympus M.Zuiko ED 12-40mm f/2.8 | Canon EF-S 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.8, EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, EF-M 22mm f/2 STM | Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II LD Aspherical [IF] |

LOG IN TO REPLY
cueball
Senior Member
cueball's Avatar
479 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Illinois
Jan 04, 2018 03:52 |  #9

I would recommend the 12-40 PRO without hesitation to anyone shooting mu43. I use it as my go-to lens on an E-M1 any time I don’t require the wider aperture/speed of my prime lenses. I have also taken the combo out in harsh weather on numerous occasions and it has always held up very well.


Canon: 5D Mark IV, 16-35 f4L IS, 24-70 f2.8L II, 70-200 f2.8L IS II, 100-400 f4.5-5.6L IS II, 100 f2.8L IS Macro, 2X III, 1.4X III, 580EX II, 430EX | mu43: Olympus OMD EM-1, 17 f1.8, 45 f1.8, 75 f1.8, 12-40 f2.8 PRO, 40-150 f2.8 PRO, MC-14
Feedback: http://photography-on-the.net ...=12723614&postcount​=27889, http://photography-on-the.net ...=13303433&postcount​=30051

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

412 views & 1 like for this thread
Just how great is the 12-40mm f2.8 Pro?
FORUMS Other Digital Cameras Olympus Digital Cameras


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00129 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is piggitou
870 guests, 488 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017