Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Glamour & Nude Talk 
Thread started 07 Jan 2018 (Sunday) 10:01
Search threadPrev/next

My definition of beauty and why I like certain photo/photographers.

 
inwardphoto
Member
120 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 132
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Little Rock, AR
     
Jan 07, 2018 10:01 |  #1

Over the years I've been a camera and camera magazine collector and not a real photographer. As I've been trying to correct that, I started journaling. As I've gone back and looked at my comments about photos and what I've liked and what I didn't I discovered a few things. I won't say it's a new thought, but it enabled me to focus on the subject and clarify my reactions to what I was seeing.

1.My definition of beauty includes the flaws. The photos and the photographers who I've tended to follow don't hide the flaws, the little irregularities in the skin, the wrinkles, the cellulite, etc. I even had one photo here that I had initially not liked but kept going back to it. Then I realized what it was. Her face wasn't photoshopped to death. It showed her in all her glory, flaws and imperfect skin and all.

2. Just because we can correct just about everything in photoshop now doesn't mean we should. There is a time and a place for everything.

3. I went out and bought a copy of the book Atlas of Beauty

4. Now I have a goal and something that I can start to form a personal style

Yup I know it sounds trite and possible a bit touchy-feely but journaling (honest journaling) can be a useful tool. Give it a try. You might find somethings out about yourself and your photography may benifit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
twoshadows
Liquid Nitrogen
Avatar
6,213 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 798
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sinning in paradise
     
Apr 02, 2018 11:45 |  #2

I love to see when photography is accompanied by deep thought. I agree with your definition of beauty. And in my experience, honest reflection of any kind is both beneficial and scary. As I am fond of saying, if you are not afraid of what you are going to produce than you are not digging deep enough.

Kindness,

Julia


Miss Julia Grey
xgender.net (external link)
I'm non-binary - please refer to me as she/her/Miss

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
charlemagne
Senior Member
Avatar
382 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 2633
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Ronse - Belgium
     
Apr 04, 2018 08:13 |  #3

Often models used in photoshoots are already well-served/well preserved by nature, because a lot of us male photographers are especially interested in physically attractive and fit women, ...
This is valid also in my case, so I would find it not to be truthful/respectful to the rest of the female community to even further retouch/adapt/digitall​y sculpt their bodies to attain 'so called' perfection.
The models I work with are already perfect in their being, with their (limited, I agree) physical flaws and their mental doubts, no need to further polish them ...

:)


ludwig
ludwig desmet - beauty and fine art photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Moderator
Avatar
75,180 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2034
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Apr 04, 2018 08:36 |  #4

2. Just because we can correct just about everything in photoshop now doesn't mean we should. There is a time and a place for everything.

I would agree. It depends on who the client is. If you're shooting for yourself, do what you want keeping in mind that you can be sued for anything, anytime.
If you're being paid to shoot someone's mom, then do what makes her happy, or you won't be in business very long.
Myself, I wouldn't remove a mole unless asked to, but would start by knocking it down a little so it wasn't very prominent in the proofs.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY

641 views & 4 likes for this thread
My definition of beauty and why I like certain photo/photographers.
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Glamour & Nude Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Nidge
716 guests, 394 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.