Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment People 
Thread started 17 Jan 2018 (Wednesday) 17:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Family portrait near the Golden Gate Bridge

 
grism13
Member
Avatar
188 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Jan 2013
     
Jan 17, 2018 17:38 |  #1

Sorry about the obnoxious water mark

IMAGE: https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4290/34877536612_4af72b73de_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/V91u​w9  (external link) IMG_8265wm (external link) by Gris M. (external link), on Flickr

6D | 24-70mm f/2.8L II | 100mm Macro f/2.8L | 50mm f/1.8 STM | Tokina 19-35mm f/3.5-4.5 | EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6
Biologist by trade
flickr (external link)
http://www.grismphotog​raphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
01Ryan10
Senior Member
997 posts
Gallery: 31 photos
Likes: 1892
Joined Aug 2012
Location: OC, California
     
Jan 19, 2018 10:16 |  #2

A nice family image. I know you didn't ask, but I'll offer some comments.

I would prefer if your family stood more left of the bridge. The camera would have to pan a little more left, but your family would be on the left third of the image, the bridge would be displayed nicely, and you'd remove some of the distractions on the right side of the current image.

Again, still a nice moment for your family though.


http://RyanLunaPhotogr​aphy.com (external link)
IG: @01ryanluna10 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
40,148 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2012
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
Post edited 4 months ago by Wilt. (4 edits in all)
     
Jan 19, 2018 11:12 |  #3

01Ryan10 wrote in post #18544400 (external link)
A nice family image. I know you didn't ask, but I'll offer some comments.

I would prefer if your family stood more left of the bridge. The camera would have to pan a little more left, but your family would be on the left third of the image, the bridge would be displayed nicely, and you'd remove some of the distractions on the right side of the current image.

Again, still a nice moment for your family though.

^
IOW, do not 'bullseye' your main subject of interest (and the equally interesting background)...instead cause the viewers' eye to move around the frame to view the subjects and then the background. It makes for improved composition. Yes, your subjects might not be centered between the two towers, but the eye tends to lock in at the center because not a lot of stuff to both sides invites curiosity to scan around.
If the people were to the left of the distant tower, the line of the bridge would lead the eye from the structure at the right toward the people at the left (a somewhat different shot concept from the one voiced by Ryan)..


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
Spiderwoman
Avatar
16,542 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 3553
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Jan 19, 2018 11:19 |  #4

I think this image would be more effective as a portrait if both sides were significantly cropped to produce a vertical format.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa, more so (2 wds.), shoo-in | IMAGE EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gungnir
Senior Member
Avatar
678 posts
Gallery: 36 photos
Likes: 231
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Suffolk, England
     
Jan 26, 2018 03:15 as a reply to  @ OhLook's post |  #5

Absolutely. There is nothing of interest in 2/3 of the image.


Steve
'Be the person your dog thinks you are'

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlackBull
Senior Member
Avatar
571 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 341
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Lancashire
     
Jan 26, 2018 17:49 |  #6

One of the most iconic landmarks in the world and you get the family to stand right in front of it so we can't even see the bridge.


Lancashire Wedding Photographer ǀ Rob Georgeson Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
28,995 posts
Likes: 967
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 26, 2018 20:42 |  #7

This is where you might want to experiment with using a longer lens to change the impact of the elements in the photo. You could keep the subjects the same size but make the bridge a more prominent element by backing up and using a longer lens. Simultaneously you narrow the field of view so there is less stuff intruding in the near background to the sides.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

965 views & 3 likes for this thread
Family portrait near the Golden Gate Bridge
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mashy
708 guests, 394 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.