Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 30 Jan 2018 (Tuesday) 17:02
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon 100mm macro 2.8 L VS Canon 70-200 2.8 L IS II @100mm

 
James ­ Crockett
Member
James Crockett's Avatar
167 posts
Joined May 2017
Jan 30, 2018 17:02 |  #1

These are incredible lenses and awesome for portrait photography but with both lenses at 100mm only is the compression and image quality the same? I do more portrait work then macro work and thought about selling the macro and getting 70-200 2.8 ii. Also have the benefit of the zoom as well to fit my needs. Thanks for any advice you could give. Hope all is well.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Wilt's Avatar
39,753 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Aug 2005
Belmont, CA
Post has been edited 22 days ago by Wilt.
Jan 30, 2018 17:12 |  #2

At the same camera-to-subject distance, the perspective (subject's relationship to surrounding objects), the facial presentation, the amount of 'compression' will all be 'the same' regardless of which 100mm lens.

per photozone.de test results
the zoom at 135mm (no published tests for 100mm)

  • has 0.5% distortion (vs. 0.07% for the macro)
  • same amount of vignetting (about 1.3-1.5)
  • about same MTF in Center of field (than the macro)
  • about 10% better MTF at the Edge of field (than the macro)


The macro should perform better than the zoom+extension tube at macro distances, since macro lenses are corrected better at very close distances, and also problem has a better 'flat field' than the zoom.

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
48,049 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Jan 30, 2018 17:36 |  #3

IQ wise, it'll be near as makes no difference.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
Goldmember
MatthewK's Avatar
Joined Apr 2009
Maryland
Jan 30, 2018 21:26 |  #4

Tough call, I really like both lenses for portraits, but if you aren’t doing macro and your budget allows, go for the 70-200II. The 100L is sharper, but the zoom is very sharp as well.


flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Moncho
Member
Moncho's Avatar
Joined Dec 2015
Feb 04, 2018 10:27 |  #5

For portraiture the 70-200 will be a better tool. Even though the aperture is the same, the bokeh is smoother on the zoom, and to get more subject isolation you can walk back a little and zoom in, giving you a very different image.
The macro is a great lens and awesome for macro, headshots and waist up portraits (in exteriors, in a studio at f10 you can't tell them apart).
But if portraits are your thing, the 70-200 is a much more versatile tool.
I was going to upgrade from the 100 macro, but I fell in love with the bokeh of the 135L.


Carpe Diem
(Seize the carp!)

LOG IN TO REPLY

666 views & 4 likes for this thread
Canon 100mm macro 2.8 L VS Canon 70-200 2.8 L IS II @100mm
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00095 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is dkiom
1062 guests, 484 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017