Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 05 Feb 2018 (Monday) 08:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Sigma focus issues and their customer service

 
shaunmcfd
Senior Member
Avatar
780 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 417
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 05, 2018 08:25 |  #1

I bought a 35 1.4 art and after using it a few times I quickly realized it had some focus issues but I wanted to attribute it to user error. Unfortunately, it wasn’t. I MFA’d to my 6D with no difference. It then sat in my case for a few months as I was out of my return period and I was actually pissed st myself for not sending it back sooner. I bought a 5D4 last November and was hopeful it would focus fine on that camera but it did not. I MFA’d tonthat canera as well and it STILL would hit focus approx 2 out of every 20 shots and that was with a static subject in excellent lighting. If the subject was moving or lighting not great you shouldn’t even mount lens to camera. I took some sample shots for sigma on a tripod at 1/500 and they were still out of focus using center point on my 5d4. I contacted sigma and ended up sending it in under warranty to have them calibrate the lens. I received it back last week and if anything it seems worse on both of my cameras. I honestly feel it is a defective lens but I am getting no response back from the guy I have been dealing with at sigma. I currently have a $900 paperweight in my pelican case. I will not use rheblens on a shoot with fear of missing a shot. Anyone else dealt with this and what did you do? Attached is a Dropbox link with samples with it mounted on a tripod using a remote so I could be absolutely positive there was no camera shake.

https://www.dropbox.co​m …LfI36106QsSoeGz​teQia?dl=0 (external link)


6D | 5D4 | 24-105 f4L | Sigma 50 2.8 Macro | 17-40 f4L| 135 f2L | 70-200 f2.8L ii | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Tamron 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
oingyboingybob
Member
Avatar
141 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 49
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Devon, UK
     
Feb 05, 2018 11:02 |  #2

Agreed those shots do not look too good from a focus point of view.
Before you take it further have you tried live view?


Canon: EOS 1DX, 100-400L Mkii, 70-300 f4-5.6 mkii, 24-105L, 100 f2.8L, 16-35 f4L
Sigma: 150-600C

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaunmcfd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
780 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 417
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 05, 2018 11:27 as a reply to  @ oingyboingybob's post |  #3

I’ve tried everything. I talked to sigma again and they want me to send in my camera and lens this time. My lens was gone for 3 weeks by itself. It’s really not a good time for me to be without my main camera for that long. I have shoots lined up and my backup is supposed to be heading in for a cleaning.


6D | 5D4 | 24-105 f4L | Sigma 50 2.8 Macro | 17-40 f4L| 135 f2L | 70-200 f2.8L ii | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Tamron 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
7,885 posts
Likes: 454
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Feb 05, 2018 12:08 |  #4

shaunmcfd wrote in post #18556852 (external link)
I’ve tried everything.

https://www.service-center-locator.com …/sigma-service-center.htm (external link) lists four Sigma repair locations in Alabama. I don't know how close any are to Dothan AL but maybe consideration taking the body/lens combination to the facility and discuss with a technician. I would call first to discuss the feasibility of this approach. At least here in the Philadelphia area, the repair shops are independent but they do Sigma warranty work and are often easy to work with. The one I used several years ago is a retail facility as well and I happened to buy a tripod that was attractively priced.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
s2kennyc
Senior Member
Avatar
840 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Southern CA
     
Feb 05, 2018 12:11 |  #5

I took a look at the samples you posted to Dropbox. Do you have any examples outside in regular daylight? Try shooting something with more contrast so that we can get an idea of how it looks.


-Ken
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaunmcfd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
780 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 417
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 05, 2018 12:28 as a reply to  @ s2kennyc's post |  #6

I do. I will post later today.


6D | 5D4 | 24-105 f4L | Sigma 50 2.8 Macro | 17-40 f4L| 135 f2L | 70-200 f2.8L ii | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Tamron 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaunmcfd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
780 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 417
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 05, 2018 12:33 as a reply to  @ John from PA's post |  #7

Unfortunately there is no in-house service center in Alabama. They all have to ship them off which is the same thing I can do from my house.


6D | 5D4 | 24-105 f4L | Sigma 50 2.8 Macro | 17-40 f4L| 135 f2L | 70-200 f2.8L ii | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Tamron 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
7,885 posts
Likes: 454
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Feb 05, 2018 12:57 |  #8

You attempted to sell a 35mm Art (with dock) last October. Is this the same lens?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaunmcfd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
780 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 417
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 05, 2018 13:10 as a reply to  @ John from PA's post |  #9

It is. That’s why it was removed. I was hoping it was user error but once I saw it wasn’t I decided not to sell it. I rarely ever used t as I have the 24-70 but thought it would be a nice addition as a prime.


6D | 5D4 | 24-105 f4L | Sigma 50 2.8 Macro | 17-40 f4L| 135 f2L | 70-200 f2.8L ii | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Tamron 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Avatar
11,867 posts
Gallery: 138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2688
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
     
Feb 05, 2018 13:15 |  #10

shaunmcfd wrote in post #18556852 (external link)
I’ve tried everything. I talked to sigma again and they want me to send in my camera and lens this time. My lens was gone for 3 weeks by itself. It’s really not a good time for me to be without my main camera for that long. I have shoots lined up and my backup is supposed to be heading in for a cleaning.

Well this has an easy solution. . Just don't send the backup in at this time. . Problem solved.

I am curious - what kind of cleaning is it that you cannot just do yourself?

A sensor cleaning - and I mean a really thorough wet cleaning - is something that anybody can do themselves in, like, a minute and a half. . No need to send it in for that because it requires no expensive cleaning equipment, no special knowledge, and no skill. . Heck, a monkey could probably do it perfectly with just a week of training!

What other kind of cleaning is really necessary, that you can't just do yourself in a minute or two?


.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaunmcfd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
780 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 417
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 05, 2018 13:20 as a reply to  @ Tom Reichner's post |  #11

I was going to send it in for the 18 point.


6D | 5D4 | 24-105 f4L | Sigma 50 2.8 Macro | 17-40 f4L| 135 f2L | 70-200 f2.8L ii | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Tamron 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"I am a little creepy"
Avatar
11,867 posts
Gallery: 138 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2688
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Omak, in north-central Washington state, USA
     
Feb 05, 2018 13:28 |  #12

shaunmcfd wrote in post #18556953 (external link)
I was going to send it in for the 18 point.

Ok, yes, but ...... are any of those 18 points really necessary?

I mean, sometimes we do things just because it makes us feel better, but there is no actual, real-life benefit to doing it that we can notice. . Do you think that perhaps this is the case with the 18 point cleaning service?

I used to send my stuff in for this "check and clean" kind of servicing, but after a few years I realized that it just never made any actual difference in anything at all. . So I stopped having the cleanings done and neither my gear nor the images I take with it has noticed the difference at all. . So now I don't waste my time or my money with cleanings, and it doesn't make any difference in my gears' performance or longevity.

.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaunmcfd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
780 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 417
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 05, 2018 13:32 as a reply to  @ Tom Reichner's post |  #13

This post isn’t about what I am doing with my back up but to answer your question, yes. I believe they may be necessary. I have owner my 6D for a couple years and have never sent it in. It would make me feel better knowing the service center has done their 18 point inspection on it. I may be having it done later as I believe I might end up sending in canera and lens to be calibrated but I am going to order a new dock and try that first.


6D | 5D4 | 24-105 f4L | Sigma 50 2.8 Macro | 17-40 f4L| 135 f2L | 70-200 f2.8L ii | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Tamron 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
9,964 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1696
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Gig Harbor, Washington
     
Feb 05, 2018 15:13 |  #14

I would call sigma and ask to speak to a manager

I remember a few yrs back someone else had a similar issue. You will have to send your camera and the lens in question to sigma to have them calibrate to your body. If It cant be calibrated, then I would say it is defective and Sigma should replace

you need to get a manager involved at Sigma


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaunmcfd
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
780 posts
Gallery: 51 photos
Likes: 417
Joined Nov 2012
     
Feb 05, 2018 16:32 as a reply to  @ s2kennyc's post |  #15

I’m trying to get back to office but I was thinking about what you said and while it may have better focusing outside, what about all the times I need it inside in less than stellar lighting?


6D | 5D4 | 24-105 f4L | Sigma 50 2.8 Macro | 17-40 f4L| 135 f2L | 70-200 f2.8L ii | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Tamron 24-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

2,716 views & 18 likes for this thread
Sigma focus issues and their customer service
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SpeedRacerPhotos
859 guests, 453 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.